Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
NY Times ^ | December 22, 2004 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 12/24/2004 6:07:04 PM PST by neverdem

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

Studying these new galaxies could give cosmologists new insights into the processes by which galaxies and stars first formed out of clouds of primordial gas and dust at the beginning of time.

"It's like looking out your window and seeing a dinosaur walk by," said Dr. Tim Heckman of Johns Hopkins University, who led a team using a NASA satellite, the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, or Galex, to pinpoint the newborns. Dr. Heckman spoke in Pasadena, Calif., at a news conference at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which manages the satellite. A paper describing the results has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal.

The babies were a pleasant surprise.

Like the parents of a woman of a certain age who long ago gave up hope of grandchildren, astronomers had given up hope that the universe was still producing galaxies that could grow up to be the size of the Milky Way. The heyday of making stars, the active ingredients of galaxies, was five billion to eight billion years ago. Perhaps only dwarf galaxies were being born today.

"We didn't know if there were any newborns still around or if this phase of cosmic creation is over," Dr. Heckman explained.

The baby galaxies appear as bluish blobs of light about 10,000 light-years across in images sent back by the Galex satellite, which was launched in 2003 on a 29-month mission to survey the sky for ultraviolet emissions.

Ultraviolet light, which has a shorter wavelength than visible light, is produced by the hottest, most massive stars, like those of the Pleiades cluster, which shines in the sky above Orion these frigid crystalline nights. Because such stars do not last very long, they are also among the youngest stars in the sky.

As a result, young galaxies stand out in ultraviolet light, said Dr. Chris Martin of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the principal investigator for the Galex project. "Ultraviolet traces star formation," Dr. Martin said.

The hitch for astronomers hoping to study the recent evolution of stars and galaxies is that the atmosphere blocks ultraviolet rays from reaching Earth. So ultraviolet astronomy can be pursued only in space, with instruments like the Hubble Space Telescope and Galex.

Galex is designed to spot the ultraviolet glows of young stars and galaxies and thus help fill in the history of star formation and cosmic evolution over the last 10 billion years. It has a specially designed 20-inch-diameter telescope with a field of view four times as big as a full moon.

The new babies are only the first results of the project, and the astronomers said they expected to find more, although not many.

While they are not nearly the size of mature galaxies like the Milky Way, which is about 100,000 light-years across and has about 200 billion stars, the newborn galaxies outshine them in ultraviolet by a factor of 100 or so, which means they are producing stars "at a prodigious rate," in the words of Dr. Martin.

Dr. Alice Shapley, a theorist at the University of California, described them as "stragglers" of the great wave of galaxy formation that peaked when the universe was half its present age.

It is important, Dr. Shapley said, to try to find out what is finally causing these galaxies to form now. Are they accreting fresh star material from outside, for example? Indeed, she said, astronomers still do not know for sure whether these are really new galaxies, or whether perhaps they are old galaxies, hiding old stars inside them, that are undergoing a new burst of star formation.

These would be ideal objects to study with the Hubble Space Telescope, she added.

What will happen to these newborns is another mystery, Dr. Heckman said.

The infant Milky Way coalesced out of the murk 10 billion years ago, when the universe was more crowded and baby galaxies could bang into one another, merge and grow. "It's less clear what will happen in the future," Dr Heckman said.

The universe is now a more diffuse place, and the baby galaxies may have been born into loneliness. If so, they will never grow up.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: galex; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Jet Populsion Laboratory-Caltech/NASA
The nearby galaxy Messier 81 as it appears in visible light, top, and in ultraviolet light, which the NASA satellite Galaxy Evolution Explorer is using to map formation of galaxies across billions of years of cosmic time.

1 posted on 12/24/2004 6:07:06 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space

King County, WA, election officials immediately added their votes to Gregoire's total.

2 posted on 12/24/2004 6:11:05 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still life in the old cosmos.

All I needed to read.

3 posted on 12/24/2004 6:12:49 PM PST by vpintheak (Liberal = The antithesis of Freedom and Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

"A galaxy is hundreds of millions of stars and planets. How can it be 'here'?"


4 posted on 12/24/2004 6:13:20 PM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Beautiful photo.

Hard to believe how huge is any galaxy. Our own is simply to large to be explored by us. The fuels are inadequate, the distances are too great and our lifespans are too short.

From what Karl Saga said (BILLions and BILLions of stars) our galaxies are getting farther and farther apart from each other, thus increasing the distances.

So what's at the edge of the farthest/oldest galaxy? Spam? Lol. Is there the edge of the page out there?

Nice to think of these things at Christmas...the birth of the Son of God. That would be the same God who made the galaxy in said photo. Or if you would preferr, the God who set the big bang in motion.

5 posted on 12/24/2004 6:14:27 PM PST by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
"A galaxy is hundreds of millions of stars and planets. How can it be 'here'?"

It's not somewhere else.

6 posted on 12/24/2004 6:16:03 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

The best guess is that there is no edge; i.e., if you traced an arc in any direction for long enough it would end back where it started. (I'm simplifying, obviously.)

Think of the galaxies as dots on the surface of an inflating balloon - no edge, as the balloon gets larger, all the dots get farther from each other.


7 posted on 12/24/2004 6:20:14 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
King County, WA, election officials immediately added their votes to Gregoire's total.

ROFLMAO!

8 posted on 12/24/2004 6:21:57 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%; AdmSmith; AFellowInPhoenix; Alamo-Girl; Aeronaut; ancient_geezer; AndrewC; ...

bttt and a Merry Christmas to you all.

My very best wishes,

RA


9 posted on 12/24/2004 6:23:10 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Merry Christmas RA! {{{{hugs}}}}


10 posted on 12/24/2004 6:26:55 PM PST by Jen (Merry CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Thanks for the ping. That is an interesting article.

Merry Christmas to you and yours.


11 posted on 12/24/2004 6:28:29 PM PST by JustAmy (Remember our President and our troops in your prayers. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Slings and Arrows
King County, WA, election officials immediately added their votes to Gregoire's total.

LMAO!

13 posted on 12/24/2004 6:34:01 PM PST by BROKKANIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
which means they are producing stars "at a prodigious rate," in the words of Dr. Martin.

If anyone here gets to be put in charge of developing a new planet someday, could you ping me? I would love to help out. I don't get any pings on this planet.

14 posted on 12/24/2004 6:34:23 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space"

Wow! We're been finding so many galaxies lately.

Can I have just one of them for myself? I want to be my own boss and a somebody. I want to be king of the Galaxy.

Merry Christmas


15 posted on 12/24/2004 6:36:02 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Do astronomers ever sit back and simply be amazed at what they're looking at? Most of the time, I imagine, you're too busy with the nuts and bolts to really take in the effect these images have on layman like me.

Anyway, I'm hoping to get into a little backyard astronomy in a few years. My daughter is five but is already interested in looking through a telescope at the moon, etc.

Merry Christmas.


16 posted on 12/24/2004 6:36:03 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Do astronomers ever sit back and simply be amazed at what they're looking at?

Yes, all the time. It's just hard to publish a scientific paper consisting entirely of "Wow!"

17 posted on 12/24/2004 6:39:03 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

coolie.

I still don't buyt the BBT - I prefer the plasma explanation - but these long-delayed visual data on young galaxies are welcome additions to the database.


18 posted on 12/24/2004 6:40:37 PM PST by King Prout (When your dog licks you he is kissing you. When your cat licks you he is tasting you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Does anyone also think it is our destiny to populate the stars?


19 posted on 12/24/2004 6:40:57 PM PST by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

Merry Christmas!


20 posted on 12/24/2004 6:41:02 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson