Posted on 10/20/2004 2:34:03 PM PDT by RWR8189
Rasmussen Premium Data in his 7 day rolling averages of 5 key battleground state is:
Florida, Tie 47% (This is unchanged from yesterday)
Michigan, Kerry 50%-46% (This is a 1 point Kerry gain from yesterday)
Minnesota, Tie 47% (This is a 1 point Bush gain from yesterday)
Ohio, Bush 48%-47% (This is a 1 point Bush gain from yesterday)
Pennsylvania, Kerry 50%-46% (This is a 1 point Bush gain from yesterday)
Rasmussen Battleground Polls for 10/16
Rasmussen Battleground Polls for 10/14
Rasmussen Battleground Polls Update (10/13)
Rasmussen Battleground Polls for 10/12
Rasmussen Battleground polls - updated 10/9
Rasmussen Battleground Polls for 10/8
ping
Is he polling Wisconson and Iowa?
the DUmmies reported some positive movement in NH as well...
Guess they gave up on the Unions' State. Poopy.
positive for us or for them in NH?
Ras has moved NH from leans Kerry to toss-up.
Us.
shameless selfbump for later reading
"We still have a shot at NH. Some have given up on it, but not me. I refused to believe that Bush will lose Ohio, NH, or FL. They are underestimating Republican turnout again (like they did in 2002)."
i pray that you are correct
Yes! That's over the 50% threshhold!
And remember Bob Smith's re-election when the dinos called it for the other guy.
I cant believe the people of NH, who supposedly are anti tax, will go with a candidate who vows to raise taxes.
I worry about NH though since Sununu won by a larger than expected margin in 2002 when Mr Bush's approval rating there (and all over the country) was far higher than it is now. I think that made a difference 2 years ago.
NH has a Republican registration advantage of over 50,000 so why are we behind? are they all McCain people who won't give up their vote? does McCain need to live in NH and get that state to vote it's registration?
We'll keep going up in the polls as long as Teresa keeps opening her mouth...
I like it,,,three states with one point Bush gains...!
In my opinion, Gallup is the gold standard. Watch that one, because it consistently has been the best predictor of the outcome.
I agree with you 100%
But tracking polls are interesting when looking at trends.
More so than any other state, pollsters have a history of underestimating NH Republican turnout. Bush was supposed to lose in 2000, Sununu was supposed to lose in 2002.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.