Skip to comments.
LIBERAL JUAN WILLIAMS AT FOX
Posted on 09/15/2004 4:56:16 PM PDT by OKIEDOC
BRIT
JUAN LIKE MOST LIBERALS WANTS TO POST A FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT THEN RUN A RED HERRING SAYING THEIR WAS POSSIBLY SOME TRUTH IN WHAT IT HAD TO SAY. I BELIEVE THAT BEN BARNES HAS ALSO BEEN DISCREDITED. HE IS A $500,000 DONAR TO THE DNC.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: mycapslockisstuck; newbie; spellingnotyelling; uselessvanity; vanityofvanities; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
09/15/2004 4:56:16 PM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
To: OKIEDOC
And he was not Govenor when he claims to be either..
To: OKIEDOC
Juan that only makes them Rumors and Innuendos.
To: OKIEDOC
STOP YELLING! I mean, when you type in ALL-CAPS is looks like you're YELLINGGGG!
Tim
4
posted on
09/15/2004 5:01:23 PM PDT
by
TWohlford
To: Always Right
I saw Juan on Brit's show this evening...he's unbelievable! It's a wonder he can call himself a journalist...but then he probably can get away with it when working at NPR.
5
posted on
09/15/2004 5:01:28 PM PDT
by
bygolly
To: OKIEDOC
IMHO Williams is more reasonable than most liberals. I still remember his defense of Clarence Thomas in the Anita Hill affair. I usually disagree with him, but he is not an obnoxious doctrinaire leftist.
6
posted on
09/15/2004 5:03:43 PM PDT
by
djpg
To: bygolly
I saw Juan on Brit's show this evening...he's unbelievable! It's a wonder he can call himself a journalist...but then he probably can get away with it when working at NPR. Juan use to try to maintain some intellectual honesty. But since joining the cesspoll at NPR, Juan is a complete liberal whore.
To: OKIEDOC
Williams is there as a sideshow. It's great to see how the others put him down.
To: OKIEDOC
Watch Juan and O'Reilly now. Battle of the witless.
9
posted on
09/15/2004 5:05:25 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Always Right
Juan continues to spew the DNC talking points that all SBV's accusations have all been proven false. Mara Liasson also has done the same thing on Brit's Special Report show. I have read
Unfit for Command. I can't say that I've watched and listened to all the broadcasts on all the networks but I have not seen anything that debunks the accusations.
They seem to think all they have to do is just say they've all been proven false without actually having to prove they are false. It drives me completely nuts and I find myself screaming at the TV in frustration.
10
posted on
09/15/2004 5:12:24 PM PDT
by
bygolly
To: bygolly
I can't say that I've watched and listened to all the broadcasts on all the networks but I have not seen anything that debunks the accusations. They are debunked simply because they don't match Kerry version. Then again, Kerry has six versions of every story, so how can you match.
To: OKIEDOC
On the other hand, Williams was skeptical of the reports of the former secretary to Killian that the sentiments at the time were those expressed in the memos - ie that Bush was not fulfilling his Guard requirements - even though she felt the memos themselves were fakes. Williams noted that she was now "an old lady" (a little liberal agism) and might just be saying what she thought people wanted to hear now - maybe he's trying to make up a bit for his constant claims that the Swiftvets stories have been proven false.......
To: OKIEDOC
If you're going to be fair and balanced, you've got to have someone like Juan.
To: OKIEDOC
Like other Dem libs, Juan was hoping this National Guard nonsense thing would be vengence against Bush for what the Swift Boat Vets did to Kerry's poll numbers.
Now that it's backfired on the Dems instead, Juan is becoming unglued.
The Dems are just flailing at Bush and their frustration is obvious.
I remember how Juan acted just like this during the 2000 Florida recount and it was becoming clear that Gore wasn't going to win.
14
posted on
09/15/2004 5:22:06 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: OKIEDOC
Is a donar like a donor or like a dinar?
15
posted on
09/15/2004 5:23:14 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Intolerant in NJ
In addition, he did agree that it would be ridiculous to contend that the documents were accurate if they were proven to be fakes.
16
posted on
09/15/2004 6:08:28 PM PDT
by
etcb
To: OKIEDOC
"It's not the forgeries that are in question here. It's what they say."
What am I missing here?
They're FORGERIES!!!
17
posted on
09/15/2004 6:11:50 PM PDT
by
Pete'sWife
(Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
To: Pete'sWife
Juan kind of OUTTED himself tonight... He reminded me very much of Alan Colmes, saying all this really lame stuff, but saying it frantically...
To: OKIEDOC
Juan can't get over the Swiftvet ads. He wants to be blind and makes no sense.
19
posted on
09/15/2004 6:15:24 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: OKIEDOC
Question for Juan.
What is the probability he would accept equally good quality documents as those that cBS supplied, from, oh, say from the Swifties?
Juan is so lost in far left lib land he has no idea where he is.
20
posted on
09/15/2004 6:17:42 PM PDT
by
snooker
(French Fried Flip Flopper still Flouncing, be careful out there.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson