Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panel proposes overhaul of NASA
Houston Chronicle ^ | May 5, 2004 | MARK CARREAU

Posted on 05/05/2004 4:29:29 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

NASA faces a major transformation if the 45-year-old agency is to achieve President Bush's goals of returning explorers to the moon and sending manned missions to Mars, members of a White House advisory panel said Tuesday.

The proposed changes that will be spelled out in a report from the President's Commission on Moon, Mars and Beyond in early June would likely mean a higher level of federal oversight as well as closer links to private industry, the military and other government agencies.

Without the transformation, the space agency will not get the public, political and financial support that will be required to achieve the ambitious exploration goals outlined by Bush on Jan. 14, commission members said.

"The NASA organization must be more integrated, focused and aligned with the new mission," said Edward "Pete" Aldridge, the former Air Force secretary who chairs the nine-member commission. "Our ability to do this will be declining over time as the skill and industrial base are declining over time."

The panel met in New York City on Monday and Tuesday, the final stop on a five-city, fact-finding trip in which it listened to experts from aerospace, the military, labor, the investment community, foreign space agencies, education and entertainment with ideas on how to sustain the unprecedented undertaking.

In many cases, the experts found the modern space agency too wedded to the agency founded at the height of the Cold War to overtake the former Soviet Union's technical prowess.

Commissioner Robert Walker, a former Pennsylvania Republican congressman and House Science Committee chair, was especially critical of the course taken by the space agency after the moon landings, difficulties with the U.S.-led international space station and last year's Columbia accident.

"It's really a case where the culture and the infrastructure that worked so well during the Apollo years has become a hindrance of future development," said Walker. "Apollo was very coherent and singularly focused. It was so successful that NASA began to view itself and many people began to view it as the only way that Americans went into space."

The changes envisioned by the panel would transform NASA into an agency working alongside an industrial partner, academia and parts of other Cabinet-level agencies to expand the nation's economy into space as a means of creating new wealth and strengthening national security as well as advancing science.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: education; engineering; exploration; moon; moontomars; nasa; nationalsecurity; science; space
Space.com NASA Chief Says Agency Must Revamp Organization to Reach Moon, Mars

Orlando Sentinel Space panel gives nod to NASA's proposals

Florida Today Track record hinders moon plan

1 posted on 05/05/2004 4:29:31 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Crosslinked:

-2004- the Year of Returning to Space--

2 posted on 05/05/2004 4:34:09 AM PDT by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I doubt the biggest problem will ever be addressed: The overall stagnation of the space business, especially the launcher industry. Forty years on, they are still doing things the same way with the same mentality.

They are mired in a static, bureaucratic mindset that simply can't imagine anything outside of their own little fiefdom.

If NASA is to be saved, solutions will have to come from outside of NASA and the government contractor community.

3 posted on 05/05/2004 4:41:04 AM PDT by hopespringseternal (People should be banned for sophistry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
The Presidential Space Commission's report comes out June 2

Moon, Mars and Beyond

4 posted on 05/05/2004 4:47:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I spent two summers in college working as a research assistant at NASA/ Kennedy Space Center. I came out of that experience determined to leave my former field of study for medicine.

The amount of intellectual stagnation at NASA, at least among the civil servant employees (I didn't spend too much time with civilian contractors), is incredible. There's really no motivation to get anything done. All people care about is making up acronyms and other terms that look good on paper in order to hide the fact that nothing is being accomplished.

I very highly doubt that NASA will ever reach the moon again, much less Mars.
5 posted on 05/05/2004 5:20:45 AM PDT by AQGeiger (Militant Islam is the gangrene among humankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The changes envisioned by the panel would transform NASA into an agency working alongside an industrial partner, academia and parts of other Cabinet-level agencies to expand the nation's economy into space as a means of creating new wealth and strengthening national security as well as advancing science.

Music to my ears.

6 posted on 05/05/2004 6:08:30 AM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
Don't place any bets on that just yet. I think this report is going to shake out a lot of problems.
7 posted on 05/05/2004 7:20:42 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
Bump!
8 posted on 05/05/2004 7:21:05 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
hopespringeternal: "The overall stagnation of the space business, especially the launcher industry"

I agree. I was thinking about the next space plan, and its going to take a lot more total power than one Saturn V per mission.

We've either got to revolutionize the way we make rockets, or we need something completely new. I'm thinking the general public won't let us launch rockets until theres a crater at cape canaveral, so it may take a space elevator to get things really going.
9 posted on 05/05/2004 6:27:17 PM PDT by unibrowshift9b20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson