Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FederalReview Composite Poll and E.V. Prediction, April 27, 2004, Bush 50.39 | Kerry 48.03.
Federal Review ^ | April 27, 2004

Posted on 04/27/2004 5:15:03 AM PDT by Darth Reagan

IT’S APRIL, SO IT’S ACADEMIC  Bush 50.39 | Kerry 48.03
April 27, 2004

If I had to predict this election today, I’d see this race as I usually see Duke/UNC basketball games.  One of three things will happen.  Duke will win in a blow-out.  Duke will win a close one.  Or UNC will win a close one.  But no way will UNC win a blow-out.  I hope things are different next year, though.

 

In this election, Bush is Duke and UNC is Kerry.  I see no way that Kerry can win a significant electoral victory in November.  If history is a guide, Kerry won’t get more electoral votes than Clinton did in 1996, when he won 379-159.  And Clinton won states where Kerry appears to have little chance – Tennessee, Arizona, Nevada and Louisiana.

But even though it’s early, Kerry shows significant weakness because he has failed to gain any ground during a recent avalanche of bad news for Bush.  Some say that Bush has held up his numbers because of the rally-round-the-president factor, but I don’t think this is so.  Recent polls show Bush has increased his job approval numbers, while Kerry’s negatives have risen.  And Kerry’s negatives aren’t up because of Bush’s ad campaigns, as pollsters have found less disapproval increases in battleground states.  Bush can attribute much of his success to Kerry’s return to making speeches in public – he really does make Dole look like he has passion and Gore look like he has pizzazz.

But it’s more than Kerry’s inability to connect with voters and be liked.  In weeks when Bush trailed in the polls, he was rated low on domestic issues.  If it’s the economy, stupid, then Bush will win because he leads on foreign policy.  Why?  The economy has rebounded and the voters are refusing to let it be talked down.  In the recent ABC News poll, Bush outperforms Kerry on Terrorism, Iraq, Same-Sex Marriage, Taxes and Education and is tied or trails Kerry within the margin of error on the Economy, Job creation, Deficit, Prescription Drugs, Social Security and Health Insurance - The bread and butter of recent Democrat campaigns.

And after Dick Morris wrote that incumbents only get 15% of the undecided vote, Democrats probably were encouraged.  But, as I’ll write in more detail later, Morris’ analysis is wrong (unless he’s comparing April undecideds to November results – because those undecided in November polls do not, as a rule, break for the challenger).

So, it does seem that the state of the economy will be very important, as movement in Bush’s favor in the economic indicators, and, more importantly, in people’s perception of the economy, has favored Bush in head-to-head matchup.

But, the polls reveal a weakness for Bush.  His disapproval ratings remain in the mid-40s.  That’s high.  That’s a lot of people who either won’t vote for him or (if Kerry doesn’t close the deal) will stay home.   Also, Bush doesn’t reach 50 percent in any polls.  That’s not good for a President that is well known by the electorate.  At least Kerry can argue that he is un- or poorly defined.  This week’s composite result pushes Bush over 50%, but only barely, and only because I allocate the undecided based on job approval and favorability and unfavorability ratings for each candidate.  Without the allocation, the composite is Bush 44.8, Kerry 41.5, Undecided 12.1.  That’s a big undecided number.  If Morris is right and April undecided voters break 85/15 for the challenger, then Kerry wins 51.8-44.8.  A huge victory that makes him President:  Kerry 324 | Bush 214.

(Excerpt) Read more at federalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; composite; electionpresident; electoralcollege; electoralvote; kerry; poll; predictino; projection

1 posted on 04/27/2004 5:15:04 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Not that this matters, or has anything to do with the story, but a staunch democratic co-worker came to me yesterday & asked what he should do.....he doesn't like Kerry at all (he voted Edwards in the primary) but can't see himself voting for GW Bush.

I said...vote Nader LOL. Anyway, if THIS guy doesn't like Kerry I am sure many, many other democrats don't as well. Kind of a nice feeling from the right, no?

2 posted on 04/27/2004 5:39:02 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
I guess he's in that undecided number. The big question, will a stronger dislike for Bush but not actual support for Kerry get these people to the polls?
3 posted on 04/27/2004 5:41:39 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall; marblehead17; Phantom Lord; Behind Liberal Lines; Constitution Day; jamz; warmouth; ...
ping
4 posted on 04/27/2004 6:11:23 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Thanks.

I'm getting broken picture links on all of your images on your website, FWIW.
5 posted on 04/27/2004 6:18:39 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dales
On all pages, or just on the Composite Poll page? Funny, it works for me at home and work.

I knew I shouldn't have used Word to edit last night!
6 posted on 04/27/2004 6:34:28 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Do you use Netscape? I made some changes, let me know if it works for you. Thanks.
7 posted on 04/27/2004 6:38:20 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
At this URL.

If I try to open the images in a separate window, I get a 404.

Interestingly, the image works on this thread, but the URL is completely different than you have up on your site.

8 posted on 04/27/2004 6:39:40 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Your changes did the trick, after I forced a refresh. Thanks!
9 posted on 04/27/2004 6:41:54 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Woo hoo. I guess I really need to clean up my code!
10 posted on 04/27/2004 6:45:10 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
Regarding Morris, I understood him to say that undecideds in November break for the challenger, so if the undecideds stayed undecided, that would be bad for Bush. I didn't understand him to say anything about April undecideds.

I thought the issues break down on the ABC poll was very good news for Bush. It's hard to see how Kerry has any chance if viewers see Bush as better than Kerry on an issue like Education.

Rasmussen has shown Bush as even or better on the economy since early March. There's still 30% of the population that think we're in a recession, so the economic support has room to grow. Someone said that Democrats need to have a 7% edge in this question to be competative.
11 posted on 04/27/2004 9:31:16 AM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall
Now, admittedly, I'm not looking at Gallup and Harris polls for November (the one's I see don't report undecideds), so I don't know what numbers Morris is looking at. Other pollsters however show clearly that his conclusion is incorrect.
12 posted on 04/27/2004 10:46:30 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomEwall
Now, admittedly, I'm not looking at Gallup and Harris polls for November (the one's I see don't report undecideds), so I don't know what numbers Morris is looking at. Other pollsters however show clearly that his conclusion is incorrect.
13 posted on 04/27/2004 10:46:38 AM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
"Other pollsters however show clearly that his conclusion is incorrect." This means that other pollsters state that undecideds do not break for the challenger?

You're aware of tradesports.com? Their site is similar to the Iowa Electronic Market (except they also include states). They've had Bush at around 60 for a long time.

When you say you use the Iowa Electronic Market as if it were a constituent poll, does that mean that 52 means the same thing as a poll that says 52% would favor Bush? I don't know how you can equate these things as they seem to be very different. One is a measure of the probability that a group of people thinks a candidate will win, and the other is a sample of what people will do. The tradesports.com site, for example, has Bush as a 3 to 2 favorite, but noone thinks he'll win by 60 to 40.

Finally, why did you decide to add Rasmussen state polls? :-(
14 posted on 04/27/2004 10:56:53 AM PDT by TomEwall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
bttt
15 posted on 04/27/2004 11:02:14 AM PDT by marblehead17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

16 posted on 05/03/2004 8:32:08 PM PDT by miltonim (Fight those who do not believe in Allah. - Koran, Surah IX: 29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miltonim
Wow, you are quick.
17 posted on 05/03/2004 8:40:14 PM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson