Skip to comments.
Clarke Contradictions Leave Many Questions
Foxnews.com ^
| 3-24-04
| Jim Angle, Wendell Goler, Sharon Kehnemui
Posted on 03/24/2004 2:48:59 PM PST by veronica
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911commission; jimangle; richardclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
1
posted on
03/24/2004 2:49:00 PM PST
by
veronica
To: veronica
Clarke Contradictions Leave Many Questions Yeah! Like what's the next Flip Flop!
2
posted on
03/24/2004 2:51:30 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
To: veronica
Memo to John Thune...get footage of Daschele attacking the president for campaign commercials...
3
posted on
03/24/2004 2:51:59 PM PST
by
Keith
(IT'S ABOUT THE JUDGES)
To: veronica
This whole 9/11 commission and hearings was a waste of both taxpayers money and time.WHAT'S THE POINT? Whats done is done and this is like beating a dead horse.The reason the democratzis wanted it in the first place was to cast lies and other false aspersions on the Bush administration.What's needed is a commission to investigate John Kerry.
To: veronica
Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the Bush administration needed to answer Clarke's criticisms rather than make personal attacks on him.
Interpretation. Quit pointing out the contradictions between Clarke's former testimony and his current flip flop and start apologizing for not being able to see into the future.
5
posted on
03/24/2004 3:00:11 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: INSENSITIVE GUY
This whole 9/11 commission and hearings was a waste of both taxpayers money and time. WHAT'S THE POINT?To try and get John Kerry elected, of course. ;)
6
posted on
03/24/2004 3:01:08 PM PST
by
veronica
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
To: veronica
Maybe I have just missed some reporting here; but seems Fox News are the only ones who see any relevance in the contradictions.
7
posted on
03/24/2004 3:04:01 PM PST
by
cricket
To: veronica
FNC..."Special Report" with Brit Hume is doing a good segment on this now.
To: veronica
Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said on the Senate floor Wednesday that the Bush administration needed to answer Clarke's criticisms rather than make personal attacks on him. Daschle stays on message:Any use of a Democrats (or Democrat sycophants)own prior words against them is and "attack".
9
posted on
03/24/2004 3:05:05 PM PST
by
PogySailor
(Proud member of the RAM)
To: cricket
Drudge is even ignoring it. Amazing
10
posted on
03/24/2004 3:05:52 PM PST
by
Republican Red
("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it,")
To: Republican Red
Drudge is even ignoring it. Amazing...Drudge is more concerned today with the middle finger of the guy from American Idol...
11
posted on
03/24/2004 3:08:15 PM PST
by
veronica
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
To: veronica
So, he said he lied for Bush in 2002. I say he's lying for Kerry in 2004.
12
posted on
03/24/2004 3:10:16 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: veronica
You got to wonder though why Clarke's resignation letter warranted the siren treatment but direct contradictions in testimony under oath is ignored!
Drudge must have a grudge against Fox.
13
posted on
03/24/2004 3:11:04 PM PST
by
Republican Red
("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it,")
To: My2Cents
So, he said he lied for Bush in 2002. False in one thing, false in all, as they say in court. :))
14
posted on
03/24/2004 3:11:35 PM PST
by
veronica
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
To: veronica
President Bush and senior administration officials should do all they can to clear up these troubling questions," Daschle said. NEWS FLASH: Tom Daschle still "deeply troubled," not to mentioned "saddened."
15
posted on
03/24/2004 3:12:55 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: veronica
btt
To: INSENSITIVE GUY
As some suggested earlier, where is the "Commission on the 1993 WTC Bombing," the "Commission on the Kobahr Towers Bombing," the "Commission on the Bombing of the US Embassy in Kenya," the "Commission on the Bombing of the USS Cole," etc, etc, etc.?
17
posted on
03/24/2004 3:15:16 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: veronica
Who were the strongest Dems that called for this independent look see??? Hmmm
18
posted on
03/24/2004 3:15:30 PM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Republican Red
Let's face it: Drudge was scooped by Fox. He's in a snit.
19
posted on
03/24/2004 3:17:12 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: veronica
Correct, and a good attorney would have nailed this guy to the wall for his contradictory statements (2002 vs. today), and the jury would have been left with the conviction that he is an unreliable witness.
20
posted on
03/24/2004 3:18:52 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson