To: My2Cents
So, he said he lied for Bush in 2002. False in one thing, false in all, as they say in court. :))
14 posted on
03/24/2004 3:11:35 PM PST by
veronica
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
To: veronica
btt
To: veronica
Correct, and a good attorney would have nailed this guy to the wall for his contradictory statements (2002 vs. today), and the jury would have been left with the conviction that he is an unreliable witness.
20 posted on
03/24/2004 3:18:52 PM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: veronica
He sure changed his tune and that's obvious, but why? Just book selling? I suspect something serious from the Dirty Dems. He is trying to bring down the Commander-in-Chief during a time of war, a war against terrorists. This is serious business and I just can't believe it is all about selling books. He knows from personal experience the terrible Clinton, and all liberals' weakness in war and fighting this danger which so consumed him and what it would mean if Kerry and his unknown gang would displace Bush, Rice, Powell, Cheney and Rumsfeld during this critical time; it has to be something huge to have him do this.
To: veronica
Beware The Media and DNC are using the Plausible Lie Tactic: The Art of "The Plausible Lie"
. ...."The basic assumption that the truth lies between the testimony of the two sides always shifts the advantage to the lying side"
Our world seems to have been invaded by individuals whose approach to life and love is so drastically different from what has been the established norm for a very long time that we are ill- prepared to deal with their tactics of what can be called the "plausible lie."
We can even see that this philosophy of the "plausible lie" has overtaken the legal and administrative domains of our world, turning them into machines in which human beings with real emotions are destroyed.
Take, for example, the "legal argument." The legal argument seems to be at the foundation of our society. This amounts to little more than con-artistry: the one who is the slickest at using the structure for convincing a group of people of something, is the one who is believed.
Because this "legal argument" system has been slowly installed as part of our culture, when it invades our personal lives, we normally do not recognize it immediately.
38 posted on
03/24/2004 4:53:45 PM PST by
Helms
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson