Skip to comments.
Masonic Lodge Is Suspended After Shooting
NY Times ^
| March 15, 2004
| PATRICK HEALY
Posted on 03/14/2004 10:01:12 PM PST by Russian Sage
Masonic Lodge Is Suspended After Shooting
By PATRICK HEALY
![](http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif)
A week after a man was shot dead inside a Masonic lodge on Long Island, leaders of the state's Masonic organization made the rare move yesterday of suspending the lodge while a panel of lawyers investigates the culture and ritual that led to the shooting.
...
William James, a new arrival to the lodge, South Side 493 Masons of Patchogue, was killed Monday as he was being initiated into a social club connected to the Masons but not officially part of the organization. A 76-year-old member of the social club, the Fellow Craft Club, was supposed to fire a gun loaded with blanks, but reached into the wrong pocket, drew a licensed, loaded gun and shot Mr. James, 47, in the face.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; dooh; freemasons; guns; longisland; masons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Get there frisk free via
Google
To: Russian Sage; uglybiker
Tragic isn't it? I'm proud that the Masons are handling it honorably.
Here's the thread where we've been discussing it for a few days:
2
posted on
03/14/2004 10:04:33 PM PST
by
Trinity_Tx
(Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
To: Trinity_Tx
Let me guess. Lots of talk about Secret Societies and world government?
3
posted on
03/14/2004 10:10:48 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: Russian Sage
Double Secret Probation!!!!
4
posted on
03/14/2004 10:16:43 PM PST
by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right, never in doubt!)
To: GeronL
On the other thread?
LOL Well... It was in the main forum a few days, then moved to religion forum for a few days, and as of yesterday, even innocent lil ol' me has been banished to the *gasp* Smokey Back Room!
LOL Yeah - lotsa "ooooh but y'all keep secrets" stuff in addition to the religious quarrels.
Whatever happened to "Live and Let Live"?
5
posted on
03/14/2004 10:32:39 PM PST
by
Trinity_Tx
(Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
To: Trinity_Tx
I still don't get the allure of the Masonic Lodge. Geez, find a church already and form a club inside it if you need a secret handshake =o)
6
posted on
03/14/2004 10:36:42 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: GeronL
Let me guess. Lots of talk about Secret Societies and world government?To the nay sayers credit, they've kept the traditional Art Bell style tinfoilhattery to a minimum.
7
posted on
03/14/2004 11:28:00 PM PST
by
uglybiker
(I believe in God as much as any man. It's some of his ground crew that scares the hell out of me.)
To: uglybiker
aw darn.
8
posted on
03/14/2004 11:31:23 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: GeronL
The allure is, largely, that it isn't a church.
Many of my brothers are Christian, but many of us are not.
While a large part of the ritual is based on the bible, there is no 'believer' status required to be a Mason.
You do have to be a believer in a divine force or being - in fact, 'stupid atheists and libertines' are specifically excluded from membership - but how you see that divine force-or-being is up to you.
And that makes it attractive .. it's a fraternity that is (despite what opponents claim) based on a bedrock of morality - but which does not exclude people the way a church, by definition, must.
As for the secret handshakes, and the aprons, and the rest of the trappings .. it's no more sinister (or silly) than the requirement to start every club speech with "Mr Toastmaster", or the requirement to attend a 'make-up' meeting for Rotarians, or the prohibition on introducing new material as third-speaker-for-the-negative in a formal debate.
Each is a rule (or ritual) that is designed to maintain civility, or fairness, or teach a lesson in responsibility.
So, too, is the apron, and the square-and-compass, and the secret handshake.
Regards
Sadim
9
posted on
03/14/2004 11:34:30 PM PST
by
sadimgnik
To: Russian Sage
Something very similar happened at a KKK initiation a few weeks ago.
The Masons angle is more interesting however, so I expect an episode of "Law & Order" based on this matter within a week or so.
To: My Dog Likes Me
Something very similar happened at a KKK initiation a few weeks ago. I'm sorry that would-be Mason guy was killed in that stupid stunt, I really am. On the other hand, I am all in favor of fatal accidents being part of the KKK initiation.
By the way, even if a gun really has only blanks, it is still not safe! If one were to shoot a blank at someone's head at close range, the force from the hot gasses from the blank may be enough to punch a hole through a skull and kill the person. A few years ago I read a news story about an actor who was killed when a prop gun loaded with blanks was fired at close range to his head. I do not follow the Brady line that every gun is an accident waiting to happen, but most or maybe all gun accidents would not have happened had people used common sense.
11
posted on
03/15/2004 1:25:32 AM PST
by
Wilhelm Tell
(Lurking since 1997!)
To: GeronL
I still don't get the allure of the Masonic Lodge. Geez, find a church already and form a club inside it if you need a secret handshake =o)
When you don't get or understand something, it's usually a good to avoid making recommendations about it. With just a little research, you can readily learn that it is a fraternity based on morality, values and a belief in a higher power (i.e. God). Your recommendation seems to ignore or make light of the fact that they do good things, such as
Hospitals For Children.
BTW, is it possible that these
Notable Masons could have had some reasons for joining other than secret handshakes?
12
posted on
03/15/2004 1:51:26 AM PST
by
pt17
To: Wilhelm Tell
I agree totally.
I think this "informal lodge" must have gone outside the rules of the Masonic Order for initiations. A sad story, as the Masons do a tremendous amount of good works.
To: Russian Sage
Masons?!? Jeez, doesn't anyone join the Elks anymore?
Or maybe the Moose? (or is it Meese -- or is it Mooses? - just kidding)
14
posted on
03/15/2004 4:38:57 AM PST
by
Condor51
("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
To: Trinity_Tx
Why was the thread pulled - do you know?
15
posted on
03/15/2004 4:48:13 AM PST
by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
To: uglybiker
Why was the other thread pulled? any ideas?
and NO I am not giong there again on this thread or ever again, I have been punished enough ;^)
16
posted on
03/15/2004 6:17:35 AM PST
by
Rightly Biased
(<>< The Passion of The Christ is You.)
To: Rightly Biased; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
Why was the other thread pulled? any ideas? I noticed that, too. Is there any chance the thread could be put back up and locked? I'd like to keep it for future reference.
Thanks.
17
posted on
03/15/2004 7:50:41 AM PST
by
uglybiker
(I believe in God as much as any man. It's some of his ground crew that scares the hell out of me.)
To: Rightly Biased
NO I am not giong there again on this thread or ever again, I have been punished enough ;^) Ah, but ya gotta admit what a fine slingin' o' the mud it was! :-P
18
posted on
03/15/2004 7:53:14 AM PST
by
uglybiker
(I believe in God as much as any man. It's some of his ground crew that scares the hell out of me.)
To: Condor51
Membership in fraternal organizations has been in decline since the 60's. Although it's too early to tell, there are some signs that might be changing.
19
posted on
03/15/2004 7:55:46 AM PST
by
uglybiker
(I believe in God as much as any man. It's some of his ground crew that scares the hell out of me.)
To: gobucks
The thread had over 1300 posts on it, which was rare for such a topic. It stayed up that long because the Masons, rather than whining to have it pulled, wanted the chance to advocate for themselves and air it out like reasonable adults.
And they did. The majority of posters on both sides were able to maintain their composure (and have friendly exchanges of jokes and compliments) even while strongly disagreeing on the issue.
A couple could not, however. Admin fairly targeted and deleted a string of childish tit-for-tats a few days ago, but apparently, when another string occurred in the wee hours last night, we were all punished for their childish behavior.
Ironically, or predictably, the person from our side who provoked it had wanted the thread pulled from the beginning. I guess if you can't get even your own side to agree to have it pulled, you can trash the thread yourself to get your way.
It's just wrong. Like UglyBiker, I felt there was a lot of valuable information and debate on that thread. Now it's gone unless Jim can do something.
20
posted on
03/15/2004 12:01:01 PM PST
by
Trinity_Tx
(Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson