Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gibson's film a mirror for critics' views
Cathy Young ^ | 3.8.04

Posted on 03/07/2004 11:56:11 PM PST by ambrose

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

MEL GIBSON'S "The Passion of the Christ" may well be, to some extent, a Rorschach test onto which different people project their expectations. Where some will see a message of love and redemption, others will see hate and bigotry. Likewise, looking at the brouhaha surrounding the movie, some will see the triumph of courage and faith over the antireligious bias of the cultural elites; others will see a slick and cynical publicity campaign.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: thepassion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/07/2004 11:56:12 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

In Gibson's version, the walls tremble and one of them splits, columns fall, fires erupt, and the evil priests wander dazed amidst the rubble; Caiaphas burns his hand and looks terrified. No such destruction befalls the palace of Pontius Pilate.

Actually, Caiphus looked fairly upset, perhaps questioning if he did the right thing. So, when Caiphus is portrayed with some degree of humanity, this is evidence of Gibson's anti-semitism. When Caiphus is portrayed as indifferent to Jesus' suffering, this is also evidence of Gibson's anti-semitism.

Nice damned if you do/damned if you don't reasoning.

2 posted on 03/07/2004 11:59:28 PM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Someone who doesn't even understand basic christianity
3 posted on 03/08/2004 12:00:09 AM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
LINKS OF INTEREST:


READ THE BIBLE Online (Click Here.)

MOVIE: "The Passion of The Christ" (Click Here.)



WorldNetDaily.com: "CRY FOR 'POLITICALLLY CORRECT CRUCIFICTION'" -Commentary by Hal Lindsey (February 26, 2004)

MENS NEWS DAILY.com: "UNDENIABLY UNCOMFORTABLE, BUT YOU NEED TO GO SEE 'THE PASSION'" -Column by Jeremy Reynalds (February 26, 2004)

GIBSON'S 'PASSION' - RIVETING, VISCERAL AND BIBLICALLY ACCURATE" by Gregory J. Rummo (February 17, 2004)

INA TODAY.com - INTERNATIONAL NEWS ANALYSIS -- TODAY by Toby Westerman: "MEL'S TRIUMPH AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CHRISTIANITY The Real Reason for the Attack on 'The Passion'" (March 3, 2004)

WorldNetDaily.com: "PIG BILLBOARD: 'HE DIED FOR YOUR SINS' PETA Ad To Go Up Before Easter Meant To Generate Compassion For Animals" by Ron Strom (March 1, 2004)

4 posted on 03/08/2004 12:03:49 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I think I've figured out why liberals feel Pilate was portrayed in a sympathetic light... because he's the type of politician they like! Pondering, brooding, worried about his poll ratings, indifferent to right or wrong "what is truth?", and ultimately to be counted on to make the decision that's in his best personal interest, not what is right.

He flips and flops on whether Jesus should die. To liberals, that is a sign of a "deep thinker"...

The more I think about it, the more this Pilate reminds me of your average Rat politician. Kerry especially comes to mind.

Thoughts?
5 posted on 03/08/2004 12:04:18 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cindy; GeronL
(based on the visions of a notoriously anti-Semitic 19th Century German nun, Anne Catherine Emmerich).

Who was this nun? Was she anti-semitic?

6 posted on 03/08/2004 12:08:53 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Pilate is flippers' distant relative?
7 posted on 03/08/2004 12:24:34 AM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Hey, Ambrose, This is a good article... but you might be getting Jim Robinson in trouble. This is copyrighted by the New York Times... and we cannot repost ANYTHING in its entirety. You should tease it with excerpts and link to the article.
8 posted on 03/08/2004 12:24:36 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tagline shut down for renovations and repairs. Re-open June of 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; Admin Moderator
does this need to be excerpted?
9 posted on 03/08/2004 12:34:20 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I couldn't disagree more with Young's assertion that "there was no bias" by the liberal elite against Gibson's film. The New York Times' Frank Rich was livid at the thought of Gibson actually screening his movie without it first being vetted by the ADL. Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen were said to have vowed never to work with Gibson again. I personally have read perhaps two dozen stories claiming that the story that Gibson tells in "The Passion of the Christ" was one which "paved the way to the Holocaust" (or other variations on the theme).

Even so, I don't think the alleged anti-Semitism of "The Passion of the Christ" was the real (or only) reason so many in Hollywood and the media poured out such vituperation over Gibson's film. I think what also made them mad was their totally unforseen loss of power. They had always thought they were the ones who got to decide what kind of films Americans got to see. Then along comes Mel Gibson with $30 million in spare cash and goes right over their heads not only to make a movie that they didn't approve of but then to outfox their attempts to block it by marketing it directly to the unwashed masses.

And that's another point, when accused of bias, Hollwood always says its real bias is making money. All they try to do is make movies that people want to see. If that were really true, how do they explain the enthusiasm for "The Passion of the Christ"? Obviously there must have been huge pent-up demand for religiously-themed films which don't mock or ridicule Christians. Otherwise, the gross for "The Passion of the Christ" wouldn't be headed for $300 million by the end of this week.

10 posted on 03/08/2004 12:34:32 AM PST by ElkCounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Notice how he orders the crucifixion, then immediately washes his hands of it and lays it entirely on Caiphus. Reminds me of Kerry's explanation on voting for the Iraq War. It wasn't his fault. Bush tricked him into doing it.
11 posted on 03/08/2004 12:37:24 AM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Bio of Anne Catherine Emmerich @ The Catholic Encyclopedia

Nothing about her being anti-semitic there.

12 posted on 03/08/2004 12:38:43 AM PST by milemark (Privilege has its membership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
BUMP
13 posted on 03/08/2004 12:38:58 AM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
---He flips and flops on whether Jesus should die. To liberals, that is a sign of a "deep thinker"...

The more I think about it, the more this Pilate reminds me of your average Rat politician. Kerry especially comes to mind.

Thoughts?---

Pilate figures, with just cause that the Jews are out to screw him. Everything he does and everything that is brought before him is charged politically. Judea is in a state of almost constant turmoil with more factions than can be kept track of. Pilate must be constantly on guard against the spark that will light this tenderbox.

Judea was an important posting, but not one that was sought after. It was important to the empire strategically but in itself was a liability. From the Roman perspective the country was poor and filled with irrational fanatics that seemed to have nothing better to do than make the Roman's life miserable.

When the Jews bring Jesus before Pilate he tries to show a kind of calm, judicial interest, while frantically trying to discern just how the Jews are trying to screw him this time. Pilate simply had no frame of reference for a Messiah. The Jews probably appeared to him much as the Shiites do to us.

Remember Pilate was directly accountable to his superiors in Rome and he couldn't have been very popular with them, seeing that they sent him to Judea. I think Pilate would have agreed with Tom Hanks in Saving Private Ryan, when he said, "We're not here to do the right thing."
14 posted on 03/08/2004 12:47:57 AM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
She wrote a book called "The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ"

Amazon.com: Books: The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ

So I guess that makes her anti-semitic just as Mel Gibson's film makes him anti-semitic.

15 posted on 03/08/2004 12:49:09 AM PST by milemark (Privilege has its membership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Cathy argued in favor of the homosexual marriage thing, and I disagree with many of her arguments on social issues. At the same time, I'm strictly monotheistic, Protestant, and won't be seeing the film. Seeing the beginnings of such an ecumenical, charismatic and possibly worldwide religious political movement is interesting, though.
16 posted on 03/08/2004 12:51:27 AM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Someone who doesn't even understand basic christianity

I think that's practically a prerequisite for writing for the Boston Globe.

17 posted on 03/08/2004 12:56:19 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: familyop
There is a Camp Essayons in Korea.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/camp-essayons.htm
18 posted on 03/08/2004 12:59:14 AM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: milemark
If we enter the following keywords (just as they appear, quotes and all) in a google.com search, we see that the propaganda part of the war regarding Emmerich has already begun.

"Anne Catherine Emmerich" anti-semitic

This is going to get interesting, alright. ...think I'll take a comfortable, reinforced, shielded spot under a peak somewhere to watch the Spectacle. ...or prepare to be drafted out of retirement, even? ...and start praying.
19 posted on 03/08/2004 1:01:59 AM PST by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Concerns about reactions abroad, particularly given the recent upswing of anti-Semitism in Europe and the anti-Semitic hysteria cultivated by many governments in the Arab world, are eminently justified.

HUH? Europe has ALWAYS been largely anti-Semitic, and the Arabs, well, let's just say that this movie won't do anything to make them any MORE what they are already.

20 posted on 03/08/2004 1:03:56 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson