Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry was a member of the Naval Reserves until 1978!
Self ^ | 7 March 2004 | Self

Posted on 03/07/2004 3:17:34 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

According to the Boston Globe, John Kerry was discharged from the Naval Reserves on 16 February 1978!!

Although not on active duty, he retained his commission as an officer.

Can anyone get this out to the talk-shows??


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1978; 2004; hanoijohn; kerry; kerryrecord; militaryrecord; paris; peacetreaty; reserves; vietcong; vvaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 03/07/2004 3:17:35 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
opps, bad link-up

the Link on "self" above takes you to the Boston Globe page which shows the discharge date . . .

here is the link again http://www.boston.com/globe/nation/packages/kerry/timeline.htm
2 posted on 03/07/2004 3:20:19 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
As a reservist, he certainly had some sort of reporting/drill requirements like a National Guard person would...did he fulfill his obligations? Where are the records? Will the media go after J.F'ing.K. Like they did Bush? They might on the 5th Tuesday of the next month where the name of the month does not contain the letter "R".
3 posted on 03/07/2004 3:23:30 AM PST by Keith in Iowa (<a href="http://moveon.org" target="blank">Communist front group</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
Can anyone get this out to the talk-shows??

Don't kid yourself, neighbor, they know. But remember, there are sins of omission as well as commission.

4 posted on 03/07/2004 3:26:57 AM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
"Will the media go after J.F'ing.K. Like they did Bush?"

Damn right they will! After Fox News, Rush, Dennis Miller, Matt Drudge, etc. work this Story for at least a week!!!

5 posted on 03/07/2004 3:29:25 AM PST by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Not necessarily . . . upon discharge from active duty, you can be placed in the so-called "inactive" reserves. There are no reporting requirements, no pay, etc....

However, it is significant that, as an officer - he retained his commission (if he had resigned it, he probably wouldn't have been in the reserves).

Some who may be more familiar with these matters may correct me here, but, since he accepted a promotion to full Lieutenant on January 1 1970 and was discharged from active duty 3 months later, he still had an "unfulfilled" commitment and COULD have been recalled to active duty.
6 posted on 03/07/2004 3:30:45 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Do they???

I stumbled across this by accident - I have always heard that Kerry was out in 1970 - not that he was still a commissioned officer during the protests and other treasonous activities . . .
7 posted on 03/07/2004 3:32:11 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dacus943
Not only that, an unsanctioned meeting, as an officer, with an enemy foriegn government should have been given at least a raised eye brow or two!
8 posted on 03/07/2004 3:32:20 AM PST by mdmathis6 (The Democrats must be defeated in 2004...." MDMATHIS6, The Anti-Democrat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
"he still had an "unfulfilled" commitment and COULD have been recalled to active duty"

Would you want this back stabbing SOB in your Outfit???

9 posted on 03/07/2004 3:33:15 AM PST by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dacus943
No Way!!

But that is beside the point - he went to paris and negotiated peace terms with the enemy while we where at war, while still a commissioned officer of the United States!
10 posted on 03/07/2004 3:35:25 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
He was negotiating nothing. The DPRV knew he had no standing. He was just getting publicity photo ops to increase his stature with US leftists while DPRV sent pictures worldwide to show "real Progressive Americans" wanted war to end on their terms!.

This was not "negotiating," this was "aid and comfort for the enemy!"
11 posted on 03/07/2004 3:49:51 AM PST by MindBender26 (News first,,,, fast,,,,, five minutes sooner.... on your local FReeper Network station)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Which is exactly my point!!!

And this very fact makes him ineligable to be preseident. In fact, he should never have been allowed to hold any public office!!
12 posted on 03/07/2004 4:01:24 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
It's been a long time since I was an Army Reserve officer, so I won't rely on memory. According to this: Ready Reserve
"... the following individuals may be assigned to the Ready Reserve: 1. Military personnel released from active duty (other than active duty for training) who have incurred a total military obligation of up to eight years. ..."
As many of us know, the Ready Reserve is where you have those frequent meetings and the annual two-week active duty requirement. We don't have enough info on Kerry's situation yet, but this is definietly worth looking into.
13 posted on 03/07/2004 4:04:32 AM PST by PatrickHenry (A compassionate evolutionist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
He was probably in the inactive reserves and did not have to attend meetings. For example, my contract with the USMC was for six years. In 1970, when I was released from active duty after 4.5 years, I had to serve the remaining 1.5 years of my contract in the inactive reserves.
14 posted on 03/07/2004 4:06:28 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
John Kerry had a heck of a deal!

He joined in February 1968. He made Lieutenant in 1970. He was discharged in February 1970. I calculate 1 year 11 months and a few odd days of active duty service.

He was discharged from the USNR in 1978- date not given. That means he held a valid US Navy commission until 1978, and could be called to active duty at any time while in that status. As a matter of fact, inactive reserve members were called up for the Gulf Wars when they thought they were done with the service.

In less than 2 years, he joined, went through his basic officer training , served on a destroyer, went to swift boats, got all those cute medals, and made Lt(O-3).

I dont know what his original enlistment/commissioning contract was, but I know my original enlistment period was 6 years, with 4 to be served on active duty and the rest in the reserves.

15 posted on 03/07/2004 4:10:25 AM PST by judicial meanz (Socialism is a mental disorder, and John Kerry is its national poster child)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; JoeGar
Yes, this is what I recall as well - it would be interesting to know if it was just the "unfulfilled commitment" stuff, or something else - BUT the real point is he was STILL a commisioned officer!

PH - Since you were an officer, maybe you know the answer to this . . . does a commission "expire"?
16 posted on 03/07/2004 4:12:47 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
Under the UCMJ, it's enough to get him hanged. See my vanity post on this very subject and the need for a new Nuremberg-style tribunal.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1092498/posts
17 posted on 03/07/2004 4:14:51 AM PST by atomic conspiracy (Know the enemy, the Hollywood/Madison Avenue Cultural Axis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz
Not exactly correct . . .

February 18, 1966 – Kerry formally enlists in the U.S. Navy
January 1, 1970 – Kerry promoted to (full) Lieutenant
January 3, 1970 – Kerry requests discharge
March 1, 1970 – Kerry’s date of separation from Active Duty
February 16, 1978 - Discharged from the US Navy Reserves
18 posted on 03/07/2004 4:16:03 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz
He joined in February 1968. He made Lieutenant in 1970. He was discharged in February 1970. I calculate 1 year 11 months and a few odd days of active duty service.

Did the "powers that be" in the Navy want to get Kerry out of the Navy more than Kerry wanted to get out of the Navy? It appears that the Navy was EXTREMELY anxious and willing to get rid of Kerry!

19 posted on 03/07/2004 4:18:29 AM PST by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate
1. Commissions don't expire...you have to resign your commission at the end of your reserve service.
2. This is a non-story, and a non-issue. I stand second to no one in loathing and opposing Kerry, but there are better arguments against him,
20 posted on 03/07/2004 4:19:15 AM PST by Viet Vet in Augusta GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson