Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter introduces the catch-phrase that will live in infamy: "JOCK-SNIFFER"
Today
| Paul Klenk
Posted on 02/12/2004 9:34:14 PM PST by paulklenk
Fellow Freepers,
Search for Ann Coulter's latest column, and you'll find she has catapulted herself into a more wonderfully outrageous category of originality and wit.
She's done it with one catch phrase: "Jock sniffer.
Please don't ask me what it means. I can't imagine what it means and I'm not sure I want to try. I'd rather leave this to many more, smarter, Freepers out there in America Land.
Let's focus on this question: What, exactly, in the contect of Ann's most recent column, does this phrase (which I dare not type again) mean? Explain it for us in the most delicate but accurate way possible.
Kindest regards, and still being,
TOPICS: Extended News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; jock; jocksniffer; sniffer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Here's a link to this new column, on Ann's site.
http://www.anncoulter.org/
By the way, the first person to post an image of the Coulterater wins a bun, or a gun (your choice).
1
posted on
02/12/2004 9:34:16 PM PST
by
paulklenk
To: paulklenk
Here's the opening paragraph, to provide a context for this -- this -- phrase Ann has dared to publish:
FORMER Sen. Max Cleland is the Democrats' designated hysteric about George Bush's National Guard service. A triple amputee and Vietnam veteran, Cleland is making the rounds on talk TV, basking in the affection of liberals who have suddenly become jock-sniffers for war veterans, and working himself into a lather about President Bush's military service. Citing such renowned military experts as Molly Ivins, Cleland indignantly demands further investigation into Bush's service with the Texas Air National Guard.
2
posted on
02/12/2004 9:35:34 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: paulklenk
You know, this link p*sses me off. I made the exact same points about Max Clelland some weeks ago and got flamed for "dissing" his service, including a STFU.
I guess if I had a crowd of synchophants I could spout off to a chorus of hazzahs.
3
posted on
02/12/2004 9:38:10 PM PST
by
annyokie
(There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
To: paulklenk
Essentially the same as butt kisser.
To: paulklenk
Think of a dog, its tail wagging with excitement, as it sticks its nose into the seat of your pants in the hopes of identifying a prospective playmate, one of the "pack", or...simply...mate.
Hence, the term....
5
posted on
02/12/2004 9:38:53 PM PST
by
TheWriterInTexas
(With God's Grace, All Things Are Possible)
To: Carolinamom; Howlin; Jewels1091; Cincinatus' Wife; VOA; templar; Republican Wildcat; cyborg; ...
Be honest:
Do you know what this phrase means?
Are you willing to publish your opinion publicly?
Are you taking any prescription medication?
6
posted on
02/12/2004 9:40:12 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: paulklenk
Sorry, but I don't think it will have widespread usage as "Cheese eating surrender monkeys" :-)
7
posted on
02/12/2004 9:41:00 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: TheWriterInTexas
We have a contender!
Check out the big brain on TheWriterInTexas!
8
posted on
02/12/2004 9:41:04 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: paulklenk
Jock sniffers = suck ups, I think.
I like Ann, but I don't think it was one of her most eloquent moments.
9
posted on
02/12/2004 9:41:38 PM PST
by
socal_parrot
(David Guest, butch it up!)
To: annyokie
Naah, you are just not (widely known to be) as good looking as that other Ann.
:)
To: glorgau
What it lacks in dopey-pop likeability, it makes up for in classy but naughty smirkability.
Please don't ask me what that means.
11
posted on
02/12/2004 9:42:19 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: paulklenk
Nothing original here, liberals have been calling conservatives 'crotch sniffers' since the Lewinsky scandal.
12
posted on
02/12/2004 9:42:23 PM PST
by
John Lenin
(Just because there is no draft does not mean there are no draft dodgers)
To: socal_parrot
I, however, do.
13
posted on
02/12/2004 9:42:41 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: paulklenk
Ohhhh, that is SUCH a loaded question. Are we being serious here, or looking for the the wittiest response? I can go either way....:)
14
posted on
02/12/2004 9:42:42 PM PST
by
LisaMalia
(In Memory of James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
To: John Lenin
But for different reasons.
15
posted on
02/12/2004 9:43:01 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: Freemyland
Okay, I can live with that.
16
posted on
02/12/2004 9:43:23 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: LisaMalia
Please, do go both ways. I want everything you are offering.
17
posted on
02/12/2004 9:44:06 PM PST
by
paulklenk
(FOUR MORE WARS!)
To: All
Requisite Ann Pic (although a fake)...
18
posted on
02/12/2004 9:46:03 PM PST
by
socal_parrot
(David Guest, butch it up!)
To: paulklenk
You have to admit, Paul, that some of the media "elite" are slobbering after the Dem candidates like eager puppies looking for pats of affection from their masters.
The analogy fits.
19
posted on
02/12/2004 9:46:53 PM PST
by
TheWriterInTexas
(With God's Grace, All Things Are Possible)
To: paulklenk
You are sir a bard for the new century.
20
posted on
02/12/2004 9:47:25 PM PST
by
socal_parrot
(David Guest, butch it up!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson