Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mylroie: Big Error by O'Neill Author on 60 Minutes
Iraq News News Letter - sam11@erols.com | 1-11-04 | Laurie Mylroie

Posted on 01/11/2004 6:24:22 PM PST by Matchett-PI

In his appearance this evening on "60 Minutes," Ron Suskind, author of The Price of Loyalty, based to a large extent on information from former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill, made an astonishing, very serious misstatement.

Suskind claimed he has documents showing that preparations for the Iraq war were well underway before 9-11. He cited--and even showed--what he said was a Pentagon document, entitled, "Foreign Suitors for Iraq Oilfield contracts." He claimed the document was about planning for post-war Iraqi oil (CBS's promotional story also contains that claim): http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/printable592330.shtml

But that is not a Pentagon document. It's from the Vice-President's Office. It was part of the Energy Project that was the focus of Dick Cheney's attention before the 9/11 strikes.

And the document has nothing to do with post-war Iraq. It was part of a study of global oil supplies. Judicial Watch obtained it in a law suit and posted it, along with related documents, on its website at: http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml

Indeed, when this story first broke yesterday, the Drudge Report had the Judicial Watch document linked (no one at CBS News saw that, so they could correct the error, when the show aired?)

And what are we to make of O'Neill's bigger claims, including that the Iraq war was planned from the first days of the Bush administration (cited by Wesley Clark today to buttress his assertion that there was no need for the war, it was all political)?

In late 2000 and early 2001, the Iraqi regime was trying increasingly hard to shoot down US planes enforcing the no-fly zones. That may well have opened up discussion about overthrowing Saddam in January and February 2001, as Suskind claims, but "Iraq News," which followed the issue very closely at the time, doubts very much that any decision was made to do so then. Perhaps tellingly, Suskind doesn't claim that those discussions continued beyond February.

Finally, O'Neill's statement to Time magazine, "I never saw anything that I would characterize as evidence of weapons of mass destruction," is bizarre. From 1995 on, UNSCOM reported that Iraq retained major elements of its proscribed weapons programs. That was the consensual view within the US intelligence community on the eve of the war, as well as every other country engaged in the issue.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: booktour; bush; iraq; lauriemylroie; mylroie; oneill; pauloneill; priceofloyalty; suskind; waronterror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-283 next last
To: SupplySider
O'Neill was recommended by Cheney. And Alan Greenspan. If anyone insisted on hiring O'Neill, it was those two.
141 posted on 01/11/2004 8:56:21 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Why is it a scandal that Bush was planning an invasion before 9/11? -lasereye

Because it feeds the "it-was-all-about-oil Bush's Unjust War", and "GW's Revenge" mentalities. -prairiebreeze

We see all the time how NYTABCCBSNBC are complicit in feeding just enough of that Dean anger. That said, I have just recalled that President Bush asserted there was no plan on his desk for an invasion of Iraq. This was during the buildup to the Congressional declaration.

142 posted on 01/11/2004 8:57:39 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Welcome back, prairie.

Thanks for pinging me to #92. This story is going to be in the forefront for a while.

Anyone know how to get Laurie Mylroi's comments out there?
143 posted on 01/11/2004 9:01:30 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
BTTT
144 posted on 01/11/2004 9:02:52 PM PST by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Good work.

FNC has had Laurie Mylroi on; hope they have her again to discuss this matter.

And some administration officials to explain how geopolitics works within the White House.

Evidentally, can't ketchup Kerry doesn't understand.
145 posted on 01/11/2004 9:05:03 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Bookmark ping to related post: "Confessions of a White House Insider"
Thanks! ;-)
146 posted on 01/11/2004 9:10:15 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Patriot conspirator: Relax, you won't feel a thing..

LoL...

147 posted on 01/11/2004 9:11:04 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
O'Neill was recommended by Cheney. And Alan Greenspan. If anyone insisted on hiring O'Neill, it was those two.

After the disasterous Nicholas Brady, you'd think they would have learned something. Now we have Snow, marginally better, but of the same ilk.

148 posted on 01/11/2004 9:11:15 PM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Heuristic Hiker
Laurie Mylroie ping
149 posted on 01/11/2004 9:19:10 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat
The book has been out of print for several years but it's well worth hunting down a copy if one is interested in the era, subject matter, or speculative fiction in general.

Already done :-). found it for next to nothing in good condition on some internet site the name of which escapes me. Might have been bookfinder.com or something like that.

The worst part of the book is the arbitrary way the war starts; the Germans just randomly attack. They would have at least tried to engineer a crisis, or fake a casus belli.

The torpedo attack in NY Harbor, and the Apaches brought into the NYC suburbs running around terrorizing German troops by killing and mutilating them, was quite cool though.

150 posted on 01/11/2004 9:25:10 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: cibco
I heard Fund, but he didn't talk about Dr. Mylroie's info.
151 posted on 01/11/2004 9:25:55 PM PST by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
I'd like to say I'm shocked...but that would be a lie.
152 posted on 01/11/2004 9:27:05 PM PST by Valin (We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Finally, O'Neill's statement to Time magazine, "I never saw anything that I would characterize as evidence of weapons of mass destruction," is bizarre.

I didn't realize such things were the business of the Treasury Secretary.

This guy is a joke and a fraud.

153 posted on 01/11/2004 9:28:07 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Just sent to Dr. Bill Watterburg at KGO in San Francisco.
154 posted on 01/11/2004 9:35:40 PM PST by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
ROTFLMAO!

155 posted on 01/11/2004 9:42:59 PM PST by Cosmo (Liberalism is for Girls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
Bush was cleaning house when he got there... it takes time to root out the rats... and have substantiation for doing so. O'Neil is toast... and won't make any money off of his book... Loser!
156 posted on 01/11/2004 9:49:09 PM PST by Terridan (God help us send these Islamic Extremist savages back into Hell where they belong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; Black Agnes; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

157 posted on 01/11/2004 10:01:09 PM PST by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
ping
158 posted on 01/11/2004 10:01:51 PM PST by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
This is typical. With Bush riding high and the DemonRat front-runner crashing and burning, we'll be seeing more of these bogus stories about Bush starting the Iraq war to get rich and/or he started the war to win over the bloodthirsty swing voters who wanted revenge after Sept. 11th.

When visiting my parents this Christmas, I saw an issue of Newsweek sitting on the coffee table. The cover story was about how Dick Cheney bought into bad intelligence and engaged in cherry-picking intelligence because he was psycho about going to war in Iraq. This "inside story" of how the White House used selective perception to decide to go to war didn't name a single credible source. The whole story quoted anonymous sources "on the inside" and cited second- and third-hand conversations. I'd bet the proverbial house and lot that the entire article was dreamed up and typed by some correspondent looking to find yet another way to take a hit on Bush. The mainstream media has never been above straight-up lying.

The media doesn't need any solid reasoning to run these stories. They lie on a regular basis and are almost never held the slightest bit accountable. If really caught in a bad lie, somebody that they were wanting to get rid of anyway will get fired and the network will issue the standard apology/retraction that means less than nothing.

159 posted on 01/11/2004 10:05:11 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Bad spellers of the world untie!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sultan88
Thanks Sultan.
BTTT
160 posted on 01/11/2004 10:10:36 PM PST by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for 'Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson