Posted on 02/24/2020 11:43:09 AM PST by Zenyatta
The Ninth Circuit has been known as a bastion of liberal activism for years.
It was perhaps the best example of everything that President Donald Trump was elected to try to correct, with a return to what the Court is actually supposed to be doing, adhering to the Constitution and not to political activism.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
Strangely, this is false. Trump has NOT flipped the 9th circuit yet. Republican appointees are still a 13-16 minority. Adding semi-retired “senior” judges makes it no better, plus some of your “conservative” judges are Nixon & GHWB appointees who had to be approved by the likes of Feinstein, Boxer, and Cranston.
“So its not the 9th Circus anymore?”
Zed’s dead baby, Zed’s dead.
“Democrats are just drooling to Stack the Courts by changing the number of judges allowed as soon as they gain control if ever-”
Got that right Bob344-
Couldn’t agree more.
You need to try that again. The court composition is 16D appointed 13 R appointed. As per your reference which is correct.
No, I don’t, and other posts are in agreement as well.
Lest we forget, a “Republican” appointed Chief “Justice” Roberts, too.
I’m sorry, perhaps you mis-typed & didn’t notice.
Your post says 19 to 10, and the true number is 16:13 which is what the other posts say as well.
I saw the other posts after I answered. The poster was more tactful than I, just posting the correct number. I will have to learn from their example next time.
We all make typos, no slur intended.
Bush Appointed 9th Circuit:
1.Callahan’s other noteworthy opinions include:
In Ileto v. Glock, 370 F.3d 860 (9th Cir. 2004), a mentally disturbed man, prohibited by law from owning a gun, opened fire on a Los Angeles-area Jewish Community Center wounding several children and killing postal worker Joseph Ileto. Callahan penned a dissent sharply criticizing the majority decision that allowed a suit filed by victims against the gun manufacturer to go forward. She wrote, “(t)he potential impact of the panel’s decision is staggering ... the practical costs of forcing manufacturers to defend to juries all non-meritorious claims, as well as arguably meritorious claims, for all injuries that occurred in California cannot help but have a substantial impact on California’s economy.”
Am still being respectful: You misunderstand me:
“More judges on the 9th have been appointed by Trump than any other President, but we are still in the great minority, 19 to 10, with BJ Clinton, the father of the Coward Bush brothers and the Fraud against us.”
As others have said here, I do not count D to R, as I consider the father of the Coward Brothers Bush to be one of ourt enemies, and his appointees compromised at best.
I think Trump as it at 16-13 now, 3 from the break even point.
Meh. Roberts has ruled “with” America at times.
Let’s not make this anything more than me stating my opinion that the article failed to prove that Trump flipped anything, and that I don’t consider GHWB’s appointees to be trustworthy.
Thanks.
Please see Posts 29 and 31.
Bush Appointed
2.Hon. Sandra Segal Ikuta U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contributor at tht Federalist Society
On July 12, 2019, in City of Los Angeles V. Barr, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned a nationwide injunction issued in 2018, thus upholding preferential treatment in awarding community policing grants to cities that cooperate with immigration authorities. In the opinion, Judge Ikuta wrote, “Cooperation relating to enforcement of federal immigration law is in pursuit of the general welfare, and meets the low bar of being germane to the federal interest in providing the funding to “address crime and disorder problems, and otherwise... enhance public safety... one of the main purposes for which the grant is intended.
* In other federal judicial news, the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that courts cannot routinely shackle defendants during proceedings; Judge Alex Kozinski wrote the majority opinion, and former Kozinski clerk Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote the dissent.
Bush Appointed 9th Circuit
3.Milan Smith Contributor Federalist Society
In July 2007, in Lands Council v. McNair, Smith wrote a concurrence described as “unusually blunt and wide-ranging”, in which he criticized the court for “taking the law too far and causing much of ‘the decimation of the logging industry in the Pacific Northwest’ and the loss of legions of timber jobs.”[6] Smith’s view prevailed when the case was reviewed en banc. He wrote the opinion for the unanimous eleven-judge panel in July 2008.
United States Forest Service, 681 F. 3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2012), Smith dissented from an en banc decision of the court holding that a federal agency’s decision to refrain from acting triggered the Endangered Species Act’s interagency consultation process.
Medi-Cal case: California’s attempt to cut doctors’ fees illegal (2009)
See also: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al., v. David Maxwell-Jolly, Director of the Dept. of Health Care Services, State of California, 2:08-cv-03315-CAS-MAS)
Judge Smith wrote the majority opinion in a lawsuit involving the withholding of retroactive reimbursement payments to providers of Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal is California’s Medicaid program.[4] Judge Smith, along with judges Stephen Reinhardt and William Fletcher, ruled unanimously to uphold an injunction against cuts in the reimbursement payments to providers. The panel ruled that California’s budget crisis did not justify the 10% reduction in payments to providers.[4]
Thank you for the explanation.
I do believe the 3 Bush judges have been adjudicating as Constitutionalists.
I did some research on their decisions. They do not appear to have slid left as is so often the case.
I am glad the Judicial system is being nudged back into place. Even if some of those we have high hopes for will disappoint in future we stand at a much better place and can continue to drive the ball down the course.
Another reason to motivate everyone we know to vote in November. The Left must be denied the power to change the court system & destroy the legitimacy of our Government.
Absolutely. I understand your point and share in your disgust with Roberts. I had researched & posted about all 3 before reading your last post.
Thanks, your research is much appreciated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.