Posted on 04/07/2024 11:43:00 AM PDT by george76
The largest study to date investigating a single invitation to a PSA blood test to screen for prostate cancer has found it had a small impact on reducing deaths, but also led to overdiagnosis and missed early detection of some aggressive cancers.
The CAP trial, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and carried out by researchers from the universities of Bristol, Oxford and Cambridge, involved over 400,000 men aged 50-69. Just under half received a single invitation for a PSA test as part of the trial.
After following up for 15 years, there was a small difference in the number of men who died from prostate cancer between the two groups—nearly 7 men out of every 1,000 in the group invited for screening had died from prostate cancer, compared to nearly 8 men out of every 1,000 in the group who hadn't been invited for screening.
The results of the trial show that an estimated 1 in 6 cancers found by the single PSA screening were overdiagnosed.
Cancer Research UK warns that overdiagnosis of prostate cancer is the main worry with PSA testing for early detection. This can result in the unnecessary treatment of cancers that would not have caused any harm in someone's lifetime.
Overdiagnosis can have a negative psychological impact, and treatment of prostate cancer may cause physical side effects including the possibility of infection following a biopsy, erectile dysfunction, and bladder and bowel problems.
Cancer Research UK also raises awareness of the importance of listening to your body and getting to know what's normal for you. If you notice a change that doesn't go away or is new, then speak to your doctor.
If a man has urinary symptoms—most of which are caused by a non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate—he can contact his GP for advice, and this may include a PSA test.
Professor Richard Martin, lead author and Cancer Research UK scientist at the University of Bristol, said, "Our studies have been measuring the effectiveness of the PSA test with hundreds of thousands of men for 15 years. The key takeaway is that the small reduction in prostate cancer deaths by using the test to screen healthy men does not outweigh the potential harms.
"This results in some men going on to have invasive treatment that they don't need, many years earlier than without screening, and the test is also failing to spot some cancers that do need to be treated. We need to find better ways to spot aggressive prostate cancers, so we can treat them early."
Prostate cancer is the 2nd biggest cancer killer of men in the UK, causing 12,000 deaths a year. There is currently no national screening program for the disease. The UK National Screening Committee (NSC), which reviews the evidence for screening programs, doesn't currently recommend screening for prostate cancer because it is unclear that the benefits outweigh the harms.
Despite being widely used to decide when to send men with urinary symptoms for further checks, when used to screen for prostate cancer, research has shown that the PSA test is inaccurate—it increases detection of low-risk prostate cancers and misses some high-risk ones.
There have been improvements in diagnosing and treating the disease in the years since this trial began, including the introduction of MRI before biopsy. These changes may help to prevent some harms associated with PSA testing, but more research is needed into ways to find aggressive cancers that need to be treated.
Naser Turabi, director of evidence and implementation at Cancer Research UK, said, "Prostate cancer remains the second most common cause of cancer death in men in the UK. Despite breakthroughs in treating the disease, there's more we can do.
"The evidence shows that using a single invitation for a PSA test for a prostate cancer screening program is likely to do more harm than good for men.
"We are funding research to help us find ways of diagnosing the disease early to reduce mortality, and we have trials taking place to find the best treatment for men with prostate cancer. Our search is not over—we're determined to find ways to accurately detect aggressive prostate cancer early and identify those at highest risk."
Early prostate cancer usually has no symptoms so early detection is challenging. To try and save more lives from the disease, Cancer Research UK is funding more trials and research into prostate cancer. This includes speeding up diagnosis for men with aggressive disease with new blood, urine or genetic tests so they can start treatment sooner.
Other research, such as the STAMPEDE trial, is aiming to find the best treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer to further improve survival and quality of life. The charity has spent £21 million on prostate cancer research over the last two years to improve outcomes for patients.
Dr. Neil Smith, GP for Cancer Research UK and GP Lead for Lancashire and South Cumbria Cancer Alliance, said, "With prostate cancer causing 12,000 deaths in the UK every year, we completely understand why men want to know if they have the disease, even when they don't have symptoms.
"However, this research highlights that a PSA test for early detection can do more harm than good—it's simply not accurate enough and can lead to some men having tests and treatment that they don't need. You know your body best—so if you do notice any unusual changes, contact your GP.
“My doctor has never ordered a PSA test nor has he ever stuck his finger up my bum to see if my prostate is enlarged.”
I would find another doctor.
PSA is just an initial warning, a call to follow up with biopsy, MRI, and any other method of actually detecting cancer.
This sounds a little like misinformation by just saying that a PSA screening is the only way. The wise consumer works with a good urologist.
I get a DRE every year from a rather hot PA-c!😎
Also, here from 2014
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/when-is-it-time-to-stop-being-checked-for-prostate-cancer
anecdotally, I have a friend that was concerned about his rate of growth of PSA results even though the test was well within “acceptable” limits. Turns out he had prostate cancer and caught it in time. That was about 20 years ago.
I'm guessing most men, if they live long enough, will have some sort of prostate trouble.
“It’s almost as if all the money going to other stuff.”
Yeah, foreign countries, green garbage, illegals, consultants, beltway bandits, welfare, subsidies to big filthy city budgets, and every other boondoggle corrupt politicians can dream up.
My prostate cancer was found too late.
The premise and the article are BS put forth by insurance companies and government looking to cut costs.
Last fall at my annual physical, my doctor noticed that my PSA was around 6.3. He sent me to a urologist, who did an MRI and then a biopsy. Sure enough, the biopsy showed that I do have prostate cancer. If I were not for the PSA task, it is not likely that the diagnosis could’ve been made. They may not be perfect, but in the absence of anything else, they appear to be useful
I am currently in the process of figuring out which type of treatment to get. I am leaning toward a photon therapy offered by Fred Hutchinson in Seattle. I know two people who have been treated successfully with that therapy. The good thing about it is that the protons used to attack the tumor stop at the tumor and do not exit the other side. Therefore, the healthy cells are not affected.
Prayer would be appreciated!
Pretty much my story also. I will probably opt for proton therapy.
Glad to hear you are now cancer free for a good period of time!
I think they are trying to assert there are people who do not actually have cancer of any significant level who end up with injury or disfunction from the invasive Twelve punch needle biopsy. I’ve had it done twice — not fun.
When I had to make that decision several years back this book was informative: Dr. Patrick Walsh’s Guide to Surviving Prostate Cancer.
Also the Johns Hopkins Brady Urological Institute had some helpful information and I decided to get a second opinion from them before deciding my treatment. Proton therapy was not available when I was diagnosed.
Having been there I will be praying for you.
Thanks for the valuable information...and your prayers, especially.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.