Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York And California Getting Totally Lost With Energy Storage
Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 8 Mar, 2024 | Francis Menton

Posted on 03/09/2024 4:36:07 AM PST by MtnClimber

For a number of years, I’ve been observing demands of activists and promises of politicians that we transition our electrical grid to being supplied mainly by the intermittent renewables, wind and solar, with all large dispatchable sources (fossil fuel and nuclear) banished. Early on, I thought it was obvious that such a transition would inevitably mean that the only way to make the grid function full-time would be energy storage — on a vast scale never before contemplated or attempted.

How much storage, and at what potential cost? This is actually an arithmetic problem, somewhat cumbersome but conceptually very elementary, and easily done with today’s widely-available spreadsheet programs. To help matters along, in December 2022 I produced my energy storage Report (“The Energy Storage Conundrum”), laying out the main options and the calculations involved. My conclusion was that I could not see any way that this could be done at remotely feasible cost. (Anybody who disagrees is welcome to prove me wrong.) Today, if somebody wants to effect an energy transition in a state or country, they can just look to my Report to quickly understand the nature and extent of the energy storage challenge.

What has actually occurred since December 2022 is that our “climate leader” jurisdictions — in the U.S., that would be New York and California — have moved forward with energy storage proposals that any moron can easily see will not work. Both states are in the process of spending huge sums of money on storage capacity that is so small as to be meaningless to address the problem, and at the same time not technically capable of meeting the challenge no matter the cost. Naturally, the federal government is also involved to pick up a big chunk of the wasted cost from its infinite pile of money.

As to New York, a reader sends me a link to this June 2023 federal Department of Energy letter to the New York bureaucrats, approving a loan guarantee for construction of a 300 MW battery storage facility for grid backup. The facility in question is proposed to be placed on some large barges and anchored in the East River in the bay that once was the site of the Brooklyn Navy Yard. In some respects 300 MW is a very large battery storage facility. These are 4-hour duration batteries, so we are talking 1200 MWh of storage. My Report had a picture of a 150 MWh battery storage facility then under development in Queensland, Australia:

This one for New York would be eight times bigger! But would it be a meaningful amount of storage for backing up wind and solar generation? No. My report found, based on calculations from various jurisdictions, that about a month’s worth of storage would be the minimum needed to get through a full year without running out of power. A (30 day) month is 720 hours. New York State’s average electricity demand (from a 2023 NYISO Report linked in my previous post) is about 17,000 MW. So the 1200 MWh battery provides storage to back up the grid for — about 4.2 minutes. To get your 720 hours of backup, you will need about 10,200 of them. Bloomberg NEF gives the average 2024 price of a lithium ion battery as $150 per kWh. So this one 1200 MWh facility will run about $180,000,000 for the batteries alone. (Note that they are putting the batteries on barges and dredging the harbor to make it deep enough to anchor them there. Without doubt the final cost will be well more than double the $180 million.). 10,200 of these at the highly optimistic $180 million each will run close to $2 trillion.

Nobody in New York government is making these simple calculations. Instead, they forge ahead undeterred, without any idea how much storage is needed or how it is going to work or how much it will cost. This August 2023 article from Canary Media says that the Governor has set a goal of 6000 MW of battery storage by 2030:

[Governor Hochul] is pushing to increase the state’s battery storage capacity from about 300 megawatts today to 6,000 megawatts in 2030, to complement an expansive buildout of renewable generation.

As always, they speak of the wrong units, MW instead of MWh. But if these are the usual 4-hour batteries, 6000 MW would be 24,000 MWh. Now we’re up to about an hour and 25 minutes of storage for the State, versus a basic requirement of 720 hours. And that paltry amount will run us (at $150/kWh) at least $3.6 billion.

And California is no more numerate. Here’s a Los Angeles Times piece from October 2023 with figures on California’s plans for battery storage to back up its wind/solar-based grid:

If California is going to meet its ambitious goals to transition from electricity using fossil fuels, the state will need energy storage to shoulder a significant amount of the load. . . . Four years ago, the state counted a mere 250 megawatts of battery storage available to the California Independent System Operator, which manages the grid for 80% of the state and a small part of Nevada. By the end of this year, that number is expected to grow to 8,000 megawatts. And the amount of battery storage integrated fully into the grid is expected to increase to 19,500 megawatts by 2035 and 52,000 megawatts by 2045.

Once again, it’s the usual MW instead of MWh. But assume that that 52,000 MW in 2045 will be 4-hour duration batteries, so 208,000 MWh. At $150/kWh, that will cost California a cool $31.2 billion. And how long will that last if it starts fully charged and the wind is calm at night? This federal Department of Energy webpage gives California’s current annual electricity demand as 259.5 TWh, or 259,500 GWh. Divide by 8760 (hours in a year) and you get average demand of about 30,000 MW. So the 208,000 MWh of storage will last about seven hours. You’ll need about a hundred times that amount — at a cost of $3+ trillion — to get the 720 hours of storage that you will need.

The amounts of storage that they are talking about are so ridiculously inadequate that I won’t even bother getting to the issue of whether these lithium ion batteries can handle the physical task at hand, which in the real world would involve storing energy for a year and more before it is used, without having it drain away. But before closing, I would be remiss not to mention that both the Canary Media and LA Times pieces linked above devote considerable space to the issue of lithium ion battery fires. It seems that in both New York and California, the really tiny amounts of grid-scale battery storage built to date have been plagued by repeated major fires. From New York:

New York state is grappling with how to adjust its ambitious buildout of clean energy storage after fires broke out at three separate battery projects between late May and late July [2023]. . . . First, on May 31, a battery that NextEra Energy Resources had installed at a substation in East Hampton caught fire. . . . Then, on June 26, fire alarms went off at two battery units owned and operated by Convergent Energy and Power in Warwick, Orange County; one of those later caught fire. On July 27, a different Convergent battery at a solar farm in Chaumont caught fire and burned for four days straight.

Funny that these fires don’t seem to be news in the mainstream press. Here from the Canary piece is a picture of the fire at the Chaumont facility:

It’s the same exact story in California — repeated fires at the handful of grid battery storage facilities that have so far gone operational. From the LA Times piece:

[A] persistent problem keeps coming up — fires igniting at battery storage facilities. Most recently, a fire broke out at the Valley Center Energy Storage Facility in San Diego County on Sept. 18 [2023]. Although fire officials said the blaze was put out in about 45 minutes and extinguished by the site’s internal fire prevention system, businesses and the small number of homes within a quarter-mile of the industrial park where the facility is located were evacuated and shelter-in-place orders were in effect within a half-mile of the site. . . . In September 2022, a Tesla Megapack caught fire at a battery storage facility operated by Pacific Gas & Electric in the Northern California town of Moss Landing. No injuries were reported, but California Highway Patrol closed a section of Highway 1 and redirected traffic away from the site for hours.

Just wait until they have 208,000 MWh worth of these things out there.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: battery; energy; fires; greenenergy; greenies; greeniewhackjobs; storage; watermelons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2024 4:36:07 AM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I wonder how long a 208,000 MWh battery storage facility would burn.


2 posted on 03/09/2024 4:36:17 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAntKnee

Manhattan Contrarian ping


3 posted on 03/09/2024 4:40:41 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

They are forging ahead quickly because they don’t know how long they have to run this scam.


4 posted on 03/09/2024 4:58:46 AM PST by Jonty30 (I may not know as much american history and law as I like, but I know more than most liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Energy solution: COAL, GASOLINE, DIESAL, and NATURAL GAS.

DRILL BABY DRILL. MINE BABY MINE.


5 posted on 03/09/2024 5:00:09 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
I, took, chuckle when supposedly enlightened articles about "green" energy storage uses the wrong unites (i.e. MW instead of mWh). In my case for home solar it was always kW vs kWh.

Of course, those were always the ones telling us to to do it to save the world or some such. The few people who write about it to teach people how to make themselves more energy self-reliant (and therefore less controlled by government regulations), tend to be the ones that provide meaningful information.

6 posted on 03/09/2024 5:02:10 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Three words: Follow. The. Money.


7 posted on 03/09/2024 5:03:12 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

We are drilling.

The problem is that Deep State is exporting record amounts of it.


8 posted on 03/09/2024 5:03:51 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
The greatest danger the USA--and the world--face today is the mass delusions of the left.

Contempt for Truth is the evil most fundamental to the Decadence of Western Civilization.

9 posted on 03/09/2024 5:08:55 AM PST by Savage Beast (Pray for the Enlightenment of the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

In all the world there is nothing more toxic then the ideas that come from the minds of the left..


10 posted on 03/09/2024 5:09:57 AM PST by unread (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“it’s actually an arithmetic problem” is where I laughed so hard I spit coffee on my wife sitting next to me. she was not happy. the same people who have this “arithmetic problem” are the same people who claim that an X chromosome and a Y chromosome can be combined to create any number of genders they want. clearly arithmetic is not their strong suit.


11 posted on 03/09/2024 5:11:58 AM PST by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The first application for utility scale power storage should be to balance out peak demand in the morning and evening. That would decrease emissions while significantly improving efficiency.


12 posted on 03/09/2024 5:12:28 AM PST by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind bweek.lows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Energy Storage built and controlled by the Chinese Communist Party with a built in self-destruct switch ?


13 posted on 03/09/2024 5:17:38 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“...” the only way to make the grid function full-time would be energy storage...”

true and when they realize this, then there next solution will be rationing. all in the name of equity of course.


14 posted on 03/09/2024 5:23:11 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MattMusson
This is also how I look at the issue. I question the 720 hour target. Get rid of a peak plant that only runs a few hours at most, replace with battery. Recharge batteries with the base load plant in off peak demand time. Of course you would want extra battery capacity for max peak, plant down for maintenance, etc. So I’m confused on minimum of 720 hours capacity. Any help with what I’m missing?

Base load plants are a totally different situation and if they want to close those plants, suggest, buy candle company stock!

15 posted on 03/09/2024 5:24:55 AM PST by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

I just had a German home battery company recommended to me on a tech forum. They have a significant US presence.

When I took a cursory look at their web site, it was long on marketing to those seeking Green virtue-signaling, and short on technical information on why they have a better product. They are quite pricey.

Needless to say, I was unimpressed, and came to the conclusion that if you bought this firm’s battery system for storing energy produced by your solar array for nighttime use, you’d be overpaying for your batteries.

https://sonnenusa.com/en/


16 posted on 03/09/2024 5:35:20 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Electricity is something too important for the government not to ration it.


17 posted on 03/09/2024 5:39:49 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“As always, they speak of the wrong units, MW instead of MWh.”

Even the people who bought an EV (meaning Leftists) understand the difference between Megawatts and Megawatt-hours (or kwh, in their case), so I have to believe that the conflating of the two is INTENTIONAL, and meant to hide the fact that these battery systems might provide a decent amount of power, but being that they’ll run out in 4 hours (in this case), they cannot even make it to midnight on any given day before going dark.


18 posted on 03/09/2024 5:40:27 AM PST by BobL (Trump gets my vote, even if I have to write him in; Millions of others will do the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The solution is not batteries but rather capacitors.

An infinite number of inexpensive 10,000 mw flux capacitors wired in parallel can provide a lot of storage for non commercial energy users. Unlike batteries, flux capacitors can be stacked vertically. In parallel stacks of great height, little real estate is required. Thus in cities where property is expensive, multistory flux capacitor stacks can be spaced at intervals to supply multifamily residential needs.


19 posted on 03/09/2024 5:47:31 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Hamascide is required in totality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I’m convinced we need a Constitutional amendment to require Congresscritters and all federal employees to refer to money in the federal treasury as “stolen funds” or “money stolen from taxpayers.” Any federal employee using the term “federal funds” or equivalent language is subject to immediate discharge from federal employment.


20 posted on 03/09/2024 6:14:53 AM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson