Posted on 02/17/2024 4:57:10 PM PST by Jonty30
“ I don’t know, probably because the true history of the events that led up to WWII has been covered up or not taught?”
Sickening comment.
You are playing footsie with Hitler.
Shame on you, disgusting .
He was immensely evil with ZERO redeeming qualities .
You’re not disagreeing with me.
They are often secularist and agnostic. They believe they are intellectually beyond belief in God.
You know what's sickening? Hyperinflation, transgenderism, rampant homosexuality, and pedophilia. All of that was happening in Germany during the Weimar Republic post-WWI
You are playing footsie with Hitler.
I have done no such thing. I'm just pointing out the circumstances that led to Hitler's rise. He didn't have to happen, and even then he reached out to the UK at least a dozen times for peace. Even went to the League of Nations to stop the Germans being slaughtered in Poland, but to no avail. The U.S. should have never entered WWI, then there wouldn't have been a Hitler.
Shame on you, disgusting
Dude, we've all been lied to. Look what's happening to Europe NOW. They're getting inundated by Sub-Saharan Africans and Middle-Eastern Muslims. Thousands are pouring in weekly. And the EU wants 75 million more to be redistributed among member countries and those who refuse will get punished. It's happening all over again, exactly 100 years later.
He was immensely evil with ZERO redeeming qualities
There are hundreds of photographs and video clips of Hitler feeding animals and taking pictures with the people that say otherwise. I'm not praising him or anything, I'm just saying there's a reason why he came to power and it's never been taught in schools.
He was on the left. There are two kinds of right and left. You have objective right and left, which is a description of an individual’s relationship with the government. Somebody on the right will want strong individualism and weak government. Somebody on the objective left believes in weak individualism and strong government.
Then you have subjective left and right, which is relative to you. Right and left are political continuums with everybody in between but everybody being relatively more right or left to each other within the continuum.
Somebody who says that Hitler was right-wing is telling you that they are to the left of Hitler. The only leftist political philsophy to the left of Hitler is communism. So the American liberal is either communist or near-communist.
Hitler wanted whites to be his soldiers, by ginning up the idea that Kalergi wanted white people gone, which he did, and their willingness to be part of his military was about protecting their survival by eliminating others.
Yes, Hitler had plans for America once he solidified his control of Europe. He had international ambitions and any idea of rebuilding the German empire was about having Germany as the New Rome.
The Treaty of Versailles is what gave rise to Hitler. Had the League of Nations not be determined to break the German people for their crime of WWI, the German people would probably have not been embittered to do WWII.
European Christian Democrat/National Socialism is not Marxist Communist Leftism, sorry.
Somebody who says that Hitler was right-wing is telling you that they are to the left of Hitler.
I never said he was "right-wing." I said he espoused National Socialism, which really was the first to find a balance between free-market principles backed by an emphasis on the family and community, to prevent corporatism.
Hitler wanted whites to be his soldiers
So? He still made deals with Muslims and Japan which is Asian. He had great respect and admiration for Japan.
by ginning up the idea that Kalergi wanted white people gone, which he did, and their willingness to be part of his military was about protecting their survival by eliminating others.
Kalergi DID. He wanted Whites eliminated. Same with Barbara Spectre. It's not an "idea."
Yes, Hitler had plans for America once he solidified his control of Europe. He had international ambitions and any idea of rebuilding the German empire was about having Germany as the New Rome.
Get real. Germany didn't have the manpower to conquer the U.S. Hitler only wanted the central bankers that was controlling his country gone, and the bankers got the UK and U.S. involved to destroy Germany.
It was even before that. Even in WWI, Germany was reluctant to fight. They had a strong economy and the bloodthirsty central bankers (You know who) wanted a piece of it.
They were clearly winning until the you-know-whos got the U.S. involved.
WWI was nothing more than a pissing contest among dying empires. If the U.S. hadn't got involved, it would have ended in a stalemate (Similiar to the War of 1812) and Europe would have been stronger and the 20th century would have been much different.
“ There are hundreds of photographs and video clips of Hitler feeding animals and taking pictures with the people that say otherwise. ”
So you like cuddly Nazi propaganda .
Wow!
In the name of every man who died in a B17 over Germany I say SHAME ON YOU for your foolish comments.
For every American who died on Omaha beach shame on you.
For every American who liberated the Nazi death camps and saw first hand the evils of Hitler shame on you.
Gen Patton would slap your face if he would have been around to hear your words .
BTW, Joseph was not a Jew and could never be; Judah, the father of the Jews, was his elder half-brother.
//////
well, ok.
but it looks like you’re playing with definitions.
Joseph was the brother of Benjamin. They were sons of Jacob by his favorite wife Rachel. Was Jacob not in the line of promise?
Joseph’s two sons were Ephraim and Manasseh. They inherited portions of land in the land of Canaan, which was promised to the Israelites by God.
Were they not partakers of God’s blessing? Were they not inheritors of God’s promise to Moses?
And then God’s blessing passed from them. But only in later generations.
A thousand years later the 10 northern tribes were carried off. (but before that were they not Jews)Their remains are today’s samaritans. Their numbers are few. Even in Jesus day they were despised by Jews for being of mixed blood. So you can say — because Ephraim and Manasseh were part of those 10 northern tribes — they are not considered to be jews in today’s understanding of who is a jew.
But it appears that Israel is less discriminating about who is —strictly speaking—a Jew. For example, they’re happy to take in Ethiopian Jews —because they are by the definition of the state of Israel ...Jews.
Now I’m sure there are plenty of Jews in Israel belonging to many sects and plus plenty of secular Jews who do not think of the Ethiopian Jews as Jews.
So I don’t really care about this point. Have it any way you want.
No it is not communistic. Not even God would permit Pharaoh something so aberrant. And under Joseph’s administration, it could and would not have been.
Remember that atheism cannot be separated from communism, too.
The Egyptians were pagans to be sure (the name of their chief god Ra is a homonym and homophone of the Hebrew word for evil), but the Pharaoh of Joseph’s day knew not to curse the God of Joseph and his father Israel or else he’d be undone.
You are applying the European definition of right-left to politics. In Europe, there is no individualist politics of any note. There are no parties that support a European equivalent of American politics. It’s all big government and socialism won. Nobody argues against socialism. The debate between right and left in Europe is between keeping the monarchy or going full out Republic.
In European politics, rightwing is fascism and left wing is communism and being a centrist is still being a socialist, but a kind socialist where you can have freedom after giving your time and assets to the liberal, until the liberal is full. Once the liberal has been fed and is satiated, then you can exercise your right to freedom with you have left.
Hitler was on the left. He wasn’t a national socialist, in terms of only being concerned about Germany. Him and Stalin had plans to divide Europe in the middle. Hitler had plans to expand his empire once he solidified control of Europe.
His nationalist ambitions was to make Germany the New Rome. In that sense, the difference between him and the globalist liberal is that he wanted a Rome, while the globalist liberal didn’t want a national country to lead the world. But, economically, there was little difference between the two.
I’m just pointing out what Hitler wanted, in regards to whites. That’s all.
For Hitler, going after North America was an eventuality. Whether he could do it at the time or thirty years down the road or a hundred does not change what he wanted.
(those who are religiously minded, but are in rebellion towards God)
yep (which is why it’s hard to find people listening to Scripture)
I call balls and strikes. Those photos and videos showed how much the German people loved him. I don't think it was done for propaganda purposes.
In the name of every man who died in a B17 over Germany I say SHAME ON YOU for your foolish comments.
For every American who died on Omaha beach shame on you.
For every American who liberated the Nazi death camps and saw first hand the evils of Hitler shame on you.
Discussion of the events that led to Hitler's rise has no impunity or malice toward the Americans who bravely served.
Gen Patton would slap your face if he would have been around to hear your words
Yeah? You know what Gen. Patton also said? He said we defeated the wrong enemy. And he died a mysterious death shortly thereafter.
There is some speculation that Israelites spread themselves worldwide when the Assyrians took away their kingdom. Many cultures around the world have practices that cannot be explained in absence of Judaism. Like Dan being so prominent throughout Northern Europe or why some native tribes have tales that are similar to the tales in Judaism.
The majority of the founders of the modern nation of Israel were Socialists. The rest were Communists.
Israel even was Soviet-aligned until Golda Meir, then envoy to the USSR, broached the subject with Stalin about allowing any Soviet Jew who wanted to to “make Aliyah,” to leave Russia and emigrate to Israel.
Stalin’s blunt refusal to even consider her request got Mme. Meir’s dander up, and her pique was the start of the shift of the Israeli government from Soviet alignment to seeking alliance with American.
Interesting bit of history.
Of course I am. Germany is in Europe, duh.
It’s all big government and socialism won.
Even if this is true, who cares? It's Hitler's country. The thieving central bankers and globalists at the time had no right to impose hyperinflation and child sodomy on it.
In European politics, rightwing is fascism and left wing is communism and being a centrist is still being a socialist, but a kind socialist where you can have freedom after giving your time and assets to the liberal, until the liberal is full.
Hitler's National Socialism emphasized the family unit and community, but still gave people individual rights and freedoms. It has absolutely nothing to do with the type of socialism you're referring to, it wasn't Communism, and it wasn't the crony capitalism that's destroying America and Western nations today.
Hitler was on the left. He wasn’t a national socialist
He wasn't on the Left as we know it, damnit take the L on this, OK? Why did Germany rebound so quickly once the Nazis assumed power? I remember reading stories of German people who grew up in the 1930s and remembered how it was the greatest period of time for them. All under this "monster" Hitler.
Netenyahu went a long way twoards de- socializing Israel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.