Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30
He was on the left.

European Christian Democrat/National Socialism is not Marxist Communist Leftism, sorry.

Somebody who says that Hitler was right-wing is telling you that they are to the left of Hitler.

I never said he was "right-wing." I said he espoused National Socialism, which really was the first to find a balance between free-market principles backed by an emphasis on the family and community, to prevent corporatism.

Hitler wanted whites to be his soldiers

So? He still made deals with Muslims and Japan which is Asian. He had great respect and admiration for Japan.

by ginning up the idea that Kalergi wanted white people gone, which he did, and their willingness to be part of his military was about protecting their survival by eliminating others.

Kalergi DID. He wanted Whites eliminated. Same with Barbara Spectre. It's not an "idea."

Yes, Hitler had plans for America once he solidified his control of Europe. He had international ambitions and any idea of rebuilding the German empire was about having Germany as the New Rome.

Get real. Germany didn't have the manpower to conquer the U.S. Hitler only wanted the central bankers that was controlling his country gone, and the bankers got the UK and U.S. involved to destroy Germany.

47 posted on 02/17/2024 6:43:12 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Free Republic's most controversial and outspoken FReeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You are applying the European definition of right-left to politics. In Europe, there is no individualist politics of any note. There are no parties that support a European equivalent of American politics. It’s all big government and socialism won. Nobody argues against socialism. The debate between right and left in Europe is between keeping the monarchy or going full out Republic.

In European politics, rightwing is fascism and left wing is communism and being a centrist is still being a socialist, but a kind socialist where you can have freedom after giving your time and assets to the liberal, until the liberal is full. Once the liberal has been fed and is satiated, then you can exercise your right to freedom with you have left.

Hitler was on the left. He wasn’t a national socialist, in terms of only being concerned about Germany. Him and Stalin had plans to divide Europe in the middle. Hitler had plans to expand his empire once he solidified control of Europe.

His nationalist ambitions was to make Germany the New Rome. In that sense, the difference between him and the globalist liberal is that he wanted a Rome, while the globalist liberal didn’t want a national country to lead the world. But, economically, there was little difference between the two.

I’m just pointing out what Hitler wanted, in regards to whites. That’s all.

For Hitler, going after North America was an eventuality. Whether he could do it at the time or thirty years down the road or a hundred does not change what he wanted.


52 posted on 02/17/2024 6:56:36 PM PST by Jonty30 (What company makes rubber airplanes? Boeing, Boeing, Boeing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson