1 posted on
01/30/2024 2:50:48 PM PST by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer
Or are they converting investor dollars into science junkets, hotel stays, and free meals?
To: ckilmer
If you can’t sell it, then it’ll go the way of Tesla?
4 posted on
01/30/2024 2:58:16 PM PST by
Karliner
(Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
To: ckilmer
I’m guessing that they are about 25 years away ...
To: ckilmer
A penny per kwh. In the 50s they promised us that nuclear energy would produce electricity “too cheap to meter.” Guess we’ll see.
To: ckilmer
And they only need a few billion in tax dollars to make it happen
18 posted on
01/30/2024 7:34:51 PM PST by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eye)
To: ckilmer
In other news, a cure for cancer is “just around the corner”.
20 posted on
01/30/2024 11:29:37 PM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: ckilmer
21 posted on
01/31/2024 1:12:27 AM PST by
AdmSmith
(GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
To: ckilmer
Sciencenotes.org says: "Most of the deuterium found today formed during the Big Bang. Although it’s possible to make deuterium using a nuclear reactor, it’s not cost-effective. So, most deuterium comes from separating naturally-occurring heavy water from regular water."
So, where does he expect to find a scalable deuterium source?
36 posted on
01/31/2024 10:28:55 AM PST by
MortMan
(Corduroy pillows are making headlines.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson