Princeton professor Peter Singer sparks backlash after urging followers to 'read and ponder' 'thought-provoking' article promoting bestiality (doing the dirty with your dog? No problem, No problem)

Daily Mail UK ^ | 11/11/2023 | Laura Parnaby

[vespa300]

A Princeton professor has sparked a backlash from disgusted Twitter users after he urged his followers to 'read and ponder' a 'thought-provoking' article promoting bestiality.

[vespa300]

Princeton Perv

[Responsibility2nd]

Read and ponder this - you sick bastard....

Leviticus 20:15-16 ESV

If a man lies with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. If a woman approaches any animal and lies with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

[blackdog]

Must be a college professor thing? The Penn State guy too.

[NorthMountain]

So let it be written, so let it be done.

[Tom Tetroxide]

He is the same guy who promotes the idea of post-birth abortion up to a year or two after birth.

[logi_cal869]

muslim?

[Steely Tom]

Just what you’d expect of Today’s Ivy League.

[BipolarBob]

“The poodle was dressing provocatively. She was just asking for it”. Said a Muslim somewhere.

[Gene Eric]

I figured you were referring to Al Gore.

[NorthMountain]

How could the poor muzzie resist?

[Bounced2X]

Well,,,, Hello there handsome....

[pax_et_bonum]

[pax_et_bonum]

Really?

Didn’t know.

Thanks.

[Retain Mike]

I am going to assume this is the same Princeton bioethics professor Peter Singer who presented in the New York Times Congressional intent for ObamaCare. He said, “Rationing health care means getting value for the billions spent by setting limits on which treatments should be paid for from the public purse….There’s no doubt that it’s tough – politically, emotionally, and ethically - to make a decision that means that someone will die sooner than they would have if the decision had gone the other way….The task of health care bureaucrats is then to get the best value for resources they have been allocated….If a teenager can be expected to live another 70 years, saving that life gains 70 years, whereas a person of 85 can be expected to live another 5 years, then saving the 85-year-old will gain only 5 life-years. That suggests saving one teenager is equivalent to saving 14 85-year-olds”.

Why We Must Ration Health Care

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/magazine/19healthcare-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

By the way, wouldn’t PETA have something to say about his article?

[Reverend Wright]

“muslim?”

---

Is this satire, or a serious post ?

Even the most casual pattern recognition would have expected this:

“Biography:

Singer’s parents were Austrian Jews who immigrated to Australia from Vienna after Austria’s annexation by Nazi Germany in 1938.”

[No name given]

Indeed.

[Williams]

So the weird thing is that bestiality is illegal not because it’s immoral, but because it’s abusive to the animals.

[joshua c]

for all you dogs out there

pete’s a bottom

and he likes it rough

have at him

[Bounced2X]

;O)

I'll bet the perv counts sheep for his nighty night ritual.

[Reno89519]

Don’t these schools have a morals clause or some basic decency in what the ask and allow teachers to do on their behalf?