Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fukushima nuclear disaster: Japan to release treated water for next 30 years
Vanguard ^ | August 22, 2023

Posted on 08/22/2023 5:00:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Japan will start releasing treated radioactive water from the tsunami-hit Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean on Thursday, despite opposition from its neighbours.

The decision comes weeks after the UN’s nuclear watchdog approved the plan.

Some 1.34 million tonnes of water – enough to fill 500 Olympic-size pools – have accumulated since the 2011 tsunami destroyed the plant.

The water will be released over 30 years after being filtered and diluted.

Authorities will request for the plant’s operator to “promptly prepare” for the disposal to start on 24 August if weather and sea conditions are appropriate, Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said on Tuesday after a Cabinet meeting.

Mr Kishida had visited the plant on Sunday, prompting speculation the release was imminent.

The government has said that releasing the water is a necessary step in the lengthy and costly process of decommissioning the plant, which sits on the country’s east coast, about 220km (137 miles) north-east of the capital Tokyo.

Japan has been collecting and storing the contaminated water in tanks for more than a decade, but space is running out.

Fukushima nuclear disaster In 2011, a tsunami triggered by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake flooded three reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.

The event is regarded as the world’s worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl.

Shortly after, authorities set up an exclusion zone which continued to be expanded as radiation leaked from the plant, forcing more than 150,000 people to evacuate from the area.

The plan to release water from the plant has caused alarm across Asia and the Pacific since it was approved by the Japanese government two years ago.

It was signed off by the UN’s nuclear watchdog in July, with authorities concluding the impact on people and the environment would be negligible.

But many people, including fishermen in the region, fear that discharging the treated water will affect their livelihoods.

A crowd of protesters in Tokyo on Tuesday also staged a rally outside the prime minister’s official residence, urging the government to stop the release.

Plant operators Tepco have been filtering the water to remove more than 60 radioactive substances but the water will not be entirely radiation-free as it will still contain tritium and carbon-14- radioactive isotopes of hydrogen and carbon that cannot be easily removed from water.

Experts speak

But experts have said they are not a danger unless consumed in large quantities, because they emit very low levels of radiation.

“As long as the discharge is carried out as planned, radiation doses to people will be vanishingly small – more than a thousand times less than doses we all get from natural radiation every year,” says Prof Jim Smith, who teaches environmental science at the University of Portsmouth.

Experts also note that the contaminated water is being released into a massive body of water, the Pacific Ocean.

“Anything released from the site will therefore be massively diluted,” says Prof Gerry Thomas, who teaches molecular pathology at the Imperial College London.

Tokyo has previously said the water that will be released into the Pacific Ocean, which has been mixed with seawater, has tritium and carbon 14 levels that meet safety standards.

Nuclear plants around the world regularly release waste water with tritium levels above that of the treated water from Fukushima.

But the plan has caused uproar in neighbouring countries, with China the most vocal opponent. It accused Japan of treating the ocean like its “private sewer.”

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin reiterated Beijing’s objection on Tuesday, adding it would take “necessary measures to safeguard the marine environment, food safety and public health”.

Japan is “putting its own self-interest over the long-term well-being of all humankind” with the release of waste water, Mr Wang said.

Hong Kong said it would “immediately activate” import curbs on some Japanese food products.

Both South Korea and China have already banned fish imports from around Fukushima.

South Korea’s government, however, has endorsed the plan, and has accused protesters of scaremongering. BBC


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News; Science
KEYWORDS: fukushima; radiation; radioactive; radioactivewater; treatedwater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2023 5:00:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I could be wrong, but I think Fukishima could release all the water at once and it’s effect on the ocean would be negligible.


2 posted on 08/22/2023 5:02:20 PM PDT by Jonty30 (If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s hilarious. Chicoms are complaining but the level of radiation being released is less and lower than what the chicoms release in standard operating procedure in their nuclear reactors.


3 posted on 08/22/2023 5:03:21 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Dilution is the solution for this pollution...

The ocean is vast...Fukushima not so much.


4 posted on 08/22/2023 5:06:38 PM PDT by rottndog (What comes after America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Not in the immediate area it wouldn’t be. I think their plan sounds very reasonable.


5 posted on 08/22/2023 5:09:01 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

I don’t disagree with their plan at all. I just think the danger or radiation is often over stated. The anti-nuclear people hyperbolize by claiming that a drop of radiation will end life on the entire planet.


6 posted on 08/22/2023 5:11:54 PM PDT by Jonty30 (If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I got 72 grays of radiation for cancer.
10 yrs later I’m still going.


7 posted on 08/22/2023 5:14:55 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This is dark humor, of course. The core of a reactor burst open underground and hundreds of tons of water have been flushing the radoactive waste into the ocean since the reactor exploded, and will continue to do so.
At the same time, the Japanese made a show of storing water above ground, in containers that were supposed to be temporary and instead were coming apart at the seams.


8 posted on 08/22/2023 5:16:52 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Consider it an investment in our future…


9 posted on 08/22/2023 5:26:14 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

We are about to find out Godzills is a documentary,,,


10 posted on 08/22/2023 5:46:14 PM PDT by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
But the plan has caused uproar in neighbouring countries, with China the most vocal opponent. It accused Japan of treating the ocean like its “private sewer.”

Yes, that's funny coming from the chi-coms, that treat the entire planet as their private sewer.
11 posted on 08/22/2023 5:59:34 PM PDT by In_Iowa_not_from
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

A million tons of water in the Pacific Ocean is a rounding error.


12 posted on 08/22/2023 6:29:42 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The reactor didn’t burst anymore than the one at TMI which also remained intact.

The radiation came from the spent fuel pool at Fukushima.

Reactors are made from 4” thick steel.


13 posted on 08/22/2023 6:57:30 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

The Fukushima reactor exploded live on television and blew nuclear fuel into the air water and land. I guess you missed it.


14 posted on 08/22/2023 7:04:45 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

“On 11 March 2011, an earthquake cut power to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, and a tsunami wiped out emergency generators. Three reactor cores exploded, releasing the highest amount of radioactivity in the environment since the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.”

https://www.science.org/content/article/ten-years-later-here-s-what-fukushima-s-damaged-reactors-look-today#:~:text=On%2011%20March%202011%2C%20an,since%20the%20Chernobyl%20nuclear%20disaster.


15 posted on 08/22/2023 7:20:25 PM PDT by chuck allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The solution is simple.

Pump the contaminated water into an oil tanker. Pull up to a drilling ship used for oil exploration. Transfer the water to the drill ship and have it released on the abyssal plain of the Pacific which is about 17000 feet. The incredible slow turn over of deep waters to the surface will insure that all the radioactive elements will be harmless when they reach the surface 1000s of years later.


16 posted on 08/22/2023 9:41:34 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter-deckhand-roughneck-geologist- instructor pilot-almost chemist-pharmacist-retired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I like your plan.


17 posted on 08/22/2023 10:05:55 PM PDT by Jonty30 (If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The joys of nuclear power. Connect a pipe to the city water system and let hem drink it.


18 posted on 08/23/2023 12:28:32 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If the plan as stated is correct, that seems like the best way to proceed. Of course, there will always be protesters. The protesters are only viable if they actually have a better plan.


19 posted on 08/23/2023 5:01:25 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The death rates will tell if true.


20 posted on 08/23/2023 8:13:38 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson