The public has never seen any scientific data that shows that our use of natural resources increases temperatures or controls the climate

American Thinker ^ | 04/02/2023 | Jack Hellner

[SeekAndFind]

The United States and other supposedly advanced and intelligent countries are working as fast as they can to destroy companies that produce oil, coal, natural gas and all the products derived from them. They are doing it because of the predictions that these products cause temperatures to rise and massive climate damage.

What the media and other pushers of radical green energy policies never show is scientific data that show a direct link between our consumption of these products and warming temperatures. Because there is none.

The U.S and other countries are trying to stop allowing us to buy reasonably priced, efficient, and reliable cars and trucks and force us to buy inefficient, expensive, and impractical vehicles powered by the highly flammable pollutant Lithium.

EU To End Sales Of New Gasoline And Diesel Cars In 2035

In 1850, there were no vehicles powered by gas combustion engines and today there are around 1.5 billion of them.

If you want to know how many cars are there on Earth here you go: There are about 1.446 billion vehicles on Earth in 2022. About 19% of those vehicles are in the United States. (source)

In 1850, countries used almost zero crude oil and today World consumption is around 100 billion barrels per year.

If humans' use of coal, oil, natural gas, CO2, methane and all the derivative products that we are told cause temperatures to rise, we would not have had fluctuating temperatures the last 170 years with a total temperature rise of one to two degrees. This is especially true since an over-400-year little ice age ended around 1850. It is normal for temperatures to rise after an ice age ends. People pretending to be journalists do not have to be scientists to understand that, but they clearly don’t care.

[SeekAndFind]

The globe also would not have had a thirty-five-year cooling period from 1940-1975, so significant that a dire ice age where billions would die from starvation was predicted if all the things we are told cause warming actually did. Again, it does not take any intelligence to understand that.

Government policies should be based on factual data, not predictions especially since the dire predictions from the last 100 years have been completely wrong.

[ifinnegan]

True.

It is bogus.

We can’t even measure the “temperature” of the Earth accurately. No way can they measure the slight change of a few degrees they claim.

Even the temperature in one city varies from spot to spot every day more than they claim the temperature has risen over decades.

[algore]

why should anyone be allowed to evaluate data? The science is settled.

besides someone might interpret the data in an inappropriate way, and spread misinformation.

that alone could cause a warming effect as the global datacenters heated up with extra electron flow

[Paladin2]

Oh, there’s been plenty of cooked “data” run through all sorts of questionable “peer reviewed” methodology funded by the Deep State.

[minnesota_bound]

Something melted the mile of ice that was over much of North America and it was not the running of cars.
I think it was the sun’s heat and our orbit around it and the tilting of the earth over the year but I am not an “expert”....

[Inyo-Mono]

No Global Warming where I live.

[Bob434]

the data doesn’t matter now- the world wants to believe the lie- the left are i n control of the lie, and they have made it their “New Truth”, and the sheep never question them about it because they’d rather believe the lie and feel guilty for ‘polluting the world’- Heck- they even feel like they are viruses that have infected the world- and think that everyone but them should be eliminated one way or another- They are depopulationists who refuse to ‘lead by example’

[griffin]

Shu Up!

We don’t need data. We have Al Gore. And that is good enough for me!

BTW, Brawndo is what plants crave. It’s got electrolytes.

[Eva]

The reason that the top Globalists want to destroy companies who produce fossil fuel has nothing to do with Climate change. Scientists have already proven that there is nothing that humans can do that will lower the Earth’s temperature more than one degree over the long term.

Climate change is just a political organizing tool, designed to destroy the US economy.