New Zealand government data shows that the COVID vaccines make you MORE likely to die from COVID (not less)

substack.com ^ | 2/22/2023 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

Wow. Finally crystal clear government data shows the more you vax, the more likely you are to die from COVID. This is the OPPOSITE of what the US health authorities and medical community told us.

Steve Kirsch

 

Feb 21

 

**** WARNING ****

The data in this article comes from the results of a New Zealand FOIA request combined with published numbers on the official website (see the entire thread here).

The FOIA request does NOT ask for COVID-related deaths and the results provided were not age-stratified.

Therefore, I am currently unable to replicate these results, even though the results are consistent with other data I have from other sources, namely, the vaccines don’t reduce risk of COVID death and they make you more likely to die.

Clearly, the all-cause mortalities are up in New Zealand in 2022 vs. 2021 by 4,500 deaths. Yet there is a high vaccination rate (82% of the entire population of 5.123M people) which they claimed is why they only had 2,331 COVID deaths. So why so many all-cause deaths? Clearly there is something that is killing these people.

Stay tuned while I investigate how the age-stratified per capita numbers were derived. The sources were listed here in the lower left.

I’m writing this at 4am PST on 2/21/23. I have reached out to the author of the post and I’m waiting for a response.

In the meantime, from this data and other data, the vaccine is, at best, a “do nothing” as far as COVID death rate goes and the UK numbers show it increases all-cause mortality for all age groups, so the conclusion that it is a bad intervention remains true no matter what.

Executive summary

The government data from New Zealand shows that for each age group, the more you vax, the more likely you are to die from COVID.

The data shows that world governments are responsible for millions of excess deaths.

Now you know the truth.

I wasn’t lying. The New Zealand government stats aren’t lying.

The CDC and the health authorities and medical community were all lying to you about the safety of the vaccine. The vaccines are doing exactly the opposite of what they said.

 

The key chart is on the RIGHT. For each age group, the more you vax, the higher your risk of dying from COVID. The truth is exactly the OPPOSITE of what they told people.

That’s what happens when you give advice based upon belief instead of reality. Had they embraced full data transparency since the start of the pandemic, we could have avoided all of this. Instead, they hid the records that we needed and urged everyone, including pregnant women and kids, to get vaccinated.

Here’s a key graph in a larger size below. This is exactly the type of graph every country should be producing. But they aren’t for some reason. I wonder why?

 

This is the key chart. It shows that the risks are increased for every age group. The more you vax, the greater your risk of dying from COVID. It’s the opposite of what they were telling people. The “Boosted” columns are “supposed” to be the shortest in height.

Let’s dive into the data sources cited in the figure above

Here are the three links cited in the figure:

1. Demographics

2. Vaccine data

3. Infoshare stats

On the Infoshare stats page, the graphic didn’t specify the stats. The interesting stats appear to be:

• Population > Deaths - VSD > Deaths by age and sex (Annual-Dec)

• Population > Death Rates - DMM > Age-specific death rates by sex, December years (total population) (Annual-Dec)

Key New Zealand data

Click each image for the data source.

FOIA request response: Total ACM deaths per month by vax status

 

Population

 5.123M

Vaccine uptake by age

This is the distribution for the 4.3M people who are vaccinated in New Zealand.

Note that the 75-79 cohort is nearly 100% vaccinated and 90+ are 95% vaccinated.

 

Vaccination numbers

Note that 4.25M people are vaccinated by Feb 21, right before people started dying from COVID on Feb 22, 2022. The line below peaks at 4.3M. So in effect, everyone was vaccinated (who intended to be vaccinated) before the COVID deaths started.

 

Vaccine stage rollout

Note that the COVID cases started in New Zealand right after the boosters rolled out.

MUCH MORE AT THE LINK: New Zealand government data shows that the COVID vaccines make you MORE likely to die from COVID (not less)

 

[ransomnote]

PING

[blackdog]

Yes, and Moderna is aggressively pursuing putting that mRNA gene editing technology into our crops, food, and water supplies. They plan on putting it into all medical therapies. The CEO was on Yahoo News today celebrating this.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

In before Baffled FRoctors!

[OftheOhio]

I had a hunch this week. Guess what else may be in the coof jabs. What prompted this was my recent research into the newest sitck-in-the-nose covid test. One type has a porcine hydrogel coating over nanofibers. I wondered why were the nanofibers even needed if it had a hydrogel exterior. I had a reaction to the test and that’s why I thought to investigate.

For our fellow jewish Freepers, something to think about.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vaccines-and-porcine-gelatine/vaccines-and-porcine-gelatine

[ransomnote]

https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status/1627980449040728065

[MtnClimber]

[CheshireTheCat]

Questions from Australian Senators

Dr. John Campbell
2.69M subscribers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jDS4vayXK0

7K comments to this one

19 minutes

[TigersEye]

Any wonder why Jacinda Adern slithered back under a rock?

[simpson96]

Still seeing the “get your covid shot” tv commercials all the time....

[Qwapisking]

So when so the lawsuits begin? Got a BIG stock of popcorn and ready to POP!

[Glinda Whatsit]

Bookmark

[bitt]

p

[Pelham]

mRNA is “gene editing”? Is that supposed to be like CRISPR or like parroting nonsense that you saw on the internet?

[jonrick46]

A good read from “MIT Technology Review”: “This tech millionaire went from covid trial funder to misinformation superspreader”

After boosting unproven covid drugs and campaigning against vaccines, Steve Kirsch was abandoned by his team of scientific advisers—and left out of a job.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/05/1036408/silicon-valley-millionaire-steve-kirsch-covid-vaccine-misinformation/

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled New Zealand government data shows that the COVID vaccines make you MORE likely to die from COVID (not less), jonrick46 wrote:

A good read from “MIT Technology Review”: “This tech millionaire went from covid trial funder to misinformation superspreader”

After boosting unproven covid drugs and campaigning against vaccines, Steve Kirsch was abandoned by his team of scientific advisers—and left out of a job.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/05/1036408/silicon-valley-millionaire-steve-kirsch-covid-vaccine-misinformation/

Still working like the CIA in destroying reputations? Do you get a promotion for that or it's just a quote you fill?

I don't put much stock in the MIT Technology Review once I saw the Deep State medical machine force the Lancet to publish propaganda, which they later retracted. I've seen others publish in previously prestigious publications absolute lies to support the 'vaccine'. Now they're running and hiding.

Steve's scientific advisors are vulnerable to having their credentials stripped, funds removed, lab privileges removed etc. That's why there was Steve to begin with - he stood up and took the arrows. He saved lives - his team and the ACIP review put him on the right side of history. He's been daring the officials at the CDC and NIH to debate his team for 1 million dollars. No takers. But there are always more scientific advisors who haven't been attacked yet to help him.

Steve and others KNOW there are treatments for Covid so he funded one that is already a licensed drug, but the censorship is intense and the FAUCI machine, which you support, would not allow him to publish for peer review. If Steve's drug was approved, there could be no EUA because a treatment would formally be acknowledged. So, no approval.

So the Deep STate is working to corrode everything Steve does to help the public, and they start with the experts they can defund/delab/de-certify etc. And you're there waving pom poms proudly, clawing at those who save lives and praising/protecting those who destroy lives.

Steve is on the right side of history, saving lives, and you're not.

[Pelham]

“I don’t put much stock in the MIT Technology Review”

I guess not since you once peddled the idea that the Covid virus doesn’t exist at all.

And that all of the “Covid disease” has been caused by poison “vaccines” that were secretly administered before the “pandemic”.

Remember when you posted that lunatic theory from the Daily Expose? Do you still believe it? Or has it become too radioactive even for the vax paranoids?

[ransomnote]

You can’t refute the continuous bad news about the ‘vaccines’ so you keep trying to change the subject. And more bad news comes out...

[Pelham]

Lol. The one who tries to change the subject is you.

My subject is your promotion of one of the most crackpot conspiracy theories ever.

For understandable reasons you’re embarrassed by it.

If your fan club had been bothering to actually read the stupid claims of the Daily Expose when you post them they would have recognized those loons for what they are. You’re glad that they don’t.