Blake Masters Lands a Major Endorsement in Arizona (Libertarian drops out, endorses Masters)

Townhall ^ | 11.1.2022 | Katie Pavlich

[Signalman]

"At my invitation, Blake Masters and I had an unscripted, open, and recorded discussion and exchange of ideas on a variety of issues -- we discussed the economy, taxation, foreign policy, existential threats, education, the Federal Reserve, energy policy, guns, immigration, abortion, the drug war, separation of church and state, same-sex marriage, and euthanasia," Victor released in a statement Tuesday, "I found Blake to be generally supportive of the Live and Let Live Global Peace Movement. Likewise, we found ourselves in general agreement about how to improve America and advance the cause of freedom and peace. After that discussion, I believe it is in the best interests of freedom and peace to withdraw my candidacy and enthusiastically support Blake Masters for United States Senate. I intend to assist in any way reasonably possible to election Blake."

The race between Masters and Democratic incumbent Mark Kelly remains a dead heat with exactly one week to go until Election Day.

[rxh4n1]

“I would vote for a right leaning Libertarian (Ed Clark/Ron Paul/Tom Woods type) before Mitt Romney ANY day.”

Thanks Obama.

Whaddayamean Wayne? That works every time it’s tried. The RINOs always learn that lesson. /s

[no-s]

> When it is obvious that you will get no more than 1.5% of the vote, you don’t need to be in the mix to begin with.

To be an established party they need a certain pct of voters. To get voters they have to run. In theory Masters is getting a favor but the reality is a lot of registered Libertarians in AZ probably default to Dem anarchist (i.e. Sinema).

If Masters beats Kelly (I’m pretty sure the McCain Republican wing is pro-Kelly, so it’s a tossup), Masters should court the AZ Libertarian to join with the AZ Republican Party and help kick out the McCainists, who are decidedly anti-Republican.