Posted on 12/18/2021 3:11:54 PM PST by ransomnote
Someone commented that the article I posted, Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? (freerepublic.com), has no basis in fact and and is sensationalized to create fear. They wanted to see proof.
I exported data from the CDC's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database which indicates that, like reports of deaths to VAERS, the Covid 'vaccines' have far more reports of adverse events (i.e., blindness) than other all other vaccines.
Consider that the target audience for influenza vaccines is around 250 million per year. After years of flu vaccine administration, there are a total of 233 reports of blindness following influenza vaccination.
Note other vaccines commonly given to all school children, every year (e.g., Measles) have relatively few reports of blindness post vaccination (e.g., 51 for Measles) compared with the Covid 'vaccine', which has 1615 reports of blindness post 'vaccine' in one year of administration.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation. Note that many vaccines have zero reports of blindness post vaccination and are not shown in the table below.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
Search Term: "BLINDNESS"
VACCINE TYPE COUNT PERCENTAGE
| Anthrax | 38 | 1.47% |
| COVID-19 | 1,615 | 62.55% |
| Diphtheria | 138 | 5.34% |
| Encephalitis | 2 | 0.08% |
| Haemophilus | 34 | 1.32% |
| Hepatitis A | 61 | 2.36% |
| Hepatitis B | 157 | 6.08% |
| HPV | 217 | 8.4% |
| Influenza | 233 | 9.02% |
| Lyme | 19 | 0.74% |
| Measles | 51 | 1.98% |
| Meningitis | 91 | 3.52% |
| Mumps | 46 | 1.78% |
| Pertussis | 118 | 4.57% |
| Pneumonia | 51 | 1.98% |
| Polio | 59 | 2.29% |
| Rabies | 11 | 0.43% |
| Rotavirus | 6 | 0.23% |
| Rubella | 51 | 1.98% |
| Shingles | 158 | 6.12% |
| Smallpox | 8 | 0.31% |
| Tetanus | 133 | 5.15% |
| Tetanus | 8 | 0.31% |
| Typhoid | 11 | 0.43% |
| Varicella | 25 | 0.97% |
| Yellow Fever | 10 | 0.39% |
Spot the Covid "vaccine" in the chart below, which shows the number of reports of blindness all vaccines published to VAERS since 1990. It's the only tall bar.
The top four lines of the following table breaks down reports of blindness following Covid 'vaccination' by manufacturer. Below it appear to be misclassified data that is not properly categorized in VAERS.
REPORTS OF BLINDNESS FOLLOWING COVID 'VACCINATION'
Every day the evidence piles up, yet some continue to behave as if Covid 'vaccines' have an impressive performance record with few, if any indications we should be concerned. They say posting articles on this topic is merely 'sensationalizing' or creating needless fear and pick apart verbiage to find fault with those pointing to the evidence.
How much evidence that the Covid gene therapy shots are harmful? We've been posting evidence daily - it shouldn't trigger anyone into angry denials at this point.
My choice of wording, and that of others, also creates great angst because some have decided we are stating that 100% of every report of blindness is caused by the Covid 'vaccines'. If I meant 100% of every report indicates a causal relationship, I would state 100% of every report.
Clearly, Covid 'vaccines' are the subject of endless coincidences. The CDC and its loyal advocates on Free Republic say there's nothing to see here, and chastises any who discuss this content, reminding them that the relationship cannot be said to be causal (and note, the CDC did not specify '100%' either).
However, Steve Kirsch and his team presented a report to the FDA Advisory panel (ACIP) in which Kirsch points out that's a myth. The FDA panel was unable to refute the content of the report and ended the meeting by declining to recommend a booster dose.
"For the current COVID vaccines, our team is extremely confident that we can meet all the Bradford-Hill criteria for causality using VAERS analysis alone. Will our statisticians and VAERS experts be permitted to meet with any ACIP members to discuss the data?
For example, it is well established that a clear dose dependency relationship can be used to satisfy one of the Bradford-Hill criteria. Because two of the vaccines are multi-dose vaccines, a Dose 1/Dose 2 ratio analysis shows a very clear signal. Sadly, this type of analysis is currently being completely ignored by the CDC."
ransomnote: VAERS is a safety signal. Seeing disproportionate results or even having more than 50 reports of death would ordinarily result in having the product pulled off the market to examine them for mechanisms of harm/safety. None of the 'usual suspects' who vigorously ridicule negative reports about the vaccine express any desire for the CDC/NIH/Fauci et. al. to investigate these safety signals, much less discuss them with the medical community, or accept Steve Kirsch's million dollar offer to debate the details with his team.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 73% of all reports of 'Visual Impairment' published to VAERS in 30 years.
| 6VAX-F | 5 | 0.06% |
| ADEN_4_7 | 2 | 0.02% |
| ANTH | 34 | 0.4% |
| CHOL | 4 | 0.05% |
| COVID19 | 6,187 | 73.11% |
| DT | 5 | 0.06% |
| DTAP | 19 | 0.22% |
| DTAPHEPBIP | 1 | 0.01% |
| DTAPIPV | 12 | 0.14% |
| DTAPIPVHIB | 6 | 0.07% |
| DTIPV | 8 | 0.09% |
| DTOX | 1 | 0.01% |
| DTP | 9 | 0.11% |
| DTPIPV | 4 | 0.05% |
| FLU(H1N1) | 38 | 0.45% |
| FLU3 | 223 | 2.63% |
| FLU4 | 148 | 1.75% |
| FLUA3 | 15 | 0.18% |
| FLUA4 | 5 | 0.06% |
| FLUC3 | 7 | 0.08% |
| FLUC4 | 33 | 0.39% |
| FLUN(H1N1) | 13 | 0.15% |
| FLUN3 | 14 | 0.17% |
| FLUN4 | 10 | 0.12% |
| FLUR3 | 2 | 0.02% |
| FLUR4 | 5 | 0.06% |
| FLUX | 110 | 1.3% |
| FLUX(H1N1) | 6 | 0.07% |
| HEP | 157 | 1.86% |
| HEPA | 89 | 1.05% |
| HEPAB | 53 | 0.63% |
| HEPATYP | 1 | 0.01% |
| HIBV | 10 | 0.12% |
| HPV2 | 140 | 1.65% |
| HPV4 | 518 | 6.12% |
| HPV9 | 103 | 1.22% |
| HPVX | 39 | 0.46% |
| IPV | 28 | 0.33% |
| JEV1 | 5 | 0.06% |
| JEVX | 1 | 0.01% |
| LYME | 9 | 0.11% |
| MEN | 16 | 0.19% |
| MENB | 47 | 0.56% |
| MMR | 65 | 0.77% |
| MMRV | 7 | 0.08% |
| MNQ | 145 | 1.71% |
| OPV | 1 | 0.01% |
| PER | 1 | 0.01% |
| PNC | 4 | 0.05% |
| PNC13 | 42 | 0.5% |
| PPV | 79 | 0.93% |
| RAB | 38 | 0.45% |
| RUB | 1 | 0.01% |
| RV1 | 2 | 0.02% |
| RV5 | 7 | 0.08% |
| RVX | 2 | 0.02% |
| SMALL | 7 | 0.08% |
| SSEV | 2 | 0.02% |
| TBE | 2 | 0.02% |
| TD | 13 | 0.15% |
| TDAP | 193 | 2.28% |
| TDAPIPV | 3 | 0.04% |
| TTOX | 9 | 0.11% |
| TYP | 48 | 0.57% |
| UNK | 114 | 1.35% |
| VARCEL | 39 | 0.46% |
| VARZOS | 329 | 3.89% |
| YF | 23 | 0.27% |
Here's a visual representation of the data in the chart above.
https://i.imgur.com/2LsBvWv.png
PING
They know what side effects are being caused by this “vaccine”. They need to pull it, not mandate it.
As I have mentioned previously, I have most of the adverse affects listed for the vaxxine. I do have chronic pain and reduced acuity in one eye.
Luckily I am marinating some tuna steaks in a cheap white wine to make a cipino (I’ve made it before, I just can’t spell it (cipino, not “it”).
Horse paste— used in Africa for blindness.
There’s an unlikely ‘o’ located near the front of the word that makes it spelling it easily forgettable, at least for me.
Cioppino
Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
Actually, what I found surprising was the relatively high percentage attributed to HPV shots, given that far few people get that shot, and most who get it are young and healthy.
You’re failing to account for the number of doses each vaccine has been given.
There have been ~7 billion vaccine doses given.
You also need to account for how many people typically go blind each year, and factor that in. Are we at a higher than normal pace?
Thanks
Cioppino, Cioppino, Cioppino :)
Ransom, thanks and God bless you for all the knowledge about the shots you bring here daily. If there is anyone still willfully ignorant or a paid shill let God take of that.
That said, this post is another great bit of knowledge and I appreciate it.
What degree of blindness and where does it originate in the brain?
Clots in the brain? The blood vessels to the eyes are the tiniest ones in the body
“Are we at a higher than normal pace?”
Not fully blind from it, just one eye off the standard perameter. Does that count?
Ransom, thank you for your research!
I don’t know what the jabs and boosters are. It doesn’t appear they are “vaccines”. If they advertised them on TV the list of adverse effects, sensitivities, side effects and other potential deathly outcomes would require a fifteen minute commercial before the lawyers would sign off.
case histories, and honesty of the patient, are so important in interpreting tabulated results. Home remedies may be cheap but they have side effects, too
Ivermectin-induced blindness treated
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23317101/
Successful management of ivermectin-induced blindness in an African lion
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/26612612
~ PING ~
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63%% of all reports of Blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation.
Well, I haven’t gone blind from the vaccine, and I didn’t go blind from the first thing I was warned about all those decades ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.