Skip to comments.
American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Letter to American Medical Association (AMA) Re: Ivermectin and COVID
American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) ^
| 09/04/2021
Posted on 09/05/2021 9:05:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Gerald E. Harmon, M.D.
President, American Medical Association
AMA Plaza
330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 39300
Chicago, IL 60611-5885
Dear Dr. Harmon:
The AMA has taken the startling and unprecedented position that American physicians should immediately stop prescribing, and pharmacists should stop honoring their prescriptions for ivermectin for COVID-19 patients. The AMA is thus contradicting the professional judgment of a very large number of physicians, who are writing about 88,000 prescriptions per week. It also contradicts the Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Haruo Ozaki, who recommended that all doctors in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID.
AMA claims that ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective despite the safe prescription of billions of doses since 1981, and the mostly favorable results of 63 controlled studies in COVID-19.
AMA does not specify any recommended early treatments, but simply urges face masks, distancing, and vaccination.
Our members would appreciate clarification of the AMA’s stand on the following questions:
- What are the criteria for advocating that pharmacists override the judgment of fully qualified physicians who are responsible for individual patients?
- What are the criteria for forbidding off-label use of long-approved drugs, which constitute at least 20 percent of all prescriptions?
- On what basis does AMA demand use only within a clinical trial for ivermectin, but call for virtually universal vaccination outside of controlled trials, despite FDA warnings of potential cardiac damage in healthy young patients, and no information about long-term effects?
We believe that these questions get to the heart of issues of physician and patient autonomy, as well as scientific principles such as the need for a control group in experiments.
We look forward to your response.
Sincerely yours,
Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: aaps; ama; covid; ivermectin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: Mrs. Don-o; tellw; Huskrrrr; Jane Long; Freedom'sWorthIt; Freedom56v2; BDParrish; Phx_RC; cba123; ..
To: SeekAndFind
remember: the AMA backed Obamatard when he rolled Obamacare and they were the background at the WH strutting these idiot “doctors” like Mengele at Auschwitz.
3
posted on
09/05/2021 9:07:34 PM PDT
by
max americana
(FIRED LEFTARD employees at our office every election since 2008 and enjoyed seeing them cry.)
To: SeekAndFind
Doctors are fighting back.
4
posted on
09/05/2021 9:08:36 PM PDT
by
TheWriterTX
(Trust not in earthly princes....)
To: SeekAndFind
How many people have died from taking Ivermectin for Covid?
Anyone.
Anyone at all.
5
posted on
09/05/2021 9:10:21 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(In 2 yrs only living will be conservative Christians Liberal vaxed sheep will be dead.Trust G's plan)
To: SeekAndFind
Evidently, the purpose of the US feral government is to grant monopolies to the highest bidder.
6
posted on
09/05/2021 9:12:10 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
To: SeekAndFind
What are the criteria?
Apparently, the simple likelihood of population reduction and the
rapid progress towards a medical surveillance state.
7
posted on
09/05/2021 9:12:42 PM PDT
by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG.)
To: SeekAndFind
“What are the criteria for forbidding off-label use of long-approved drugs, which constitute at least 20 percent of all prescriptions?“
8
posted on
09/05/2021 9:13:21 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(In 2 yrs only living will be conservative Christians Liberal vaxed sheep will be dead.Trust G's plan)
To: SeekAndFind; ransomnote; Cathi; SecAmndmt; metmom; Pollard; HypatiaTaught; bagster; ...
AMA does not specify any recommended early treatments, but simply urges face masks, distancing, and vaccination. What an obviously BIASED and proven UNSAFE position. These hacks should be locked up.
9
posted on
09/05/2021 9:13:44 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation.)
To: SeekAndFind
Why is the government demanding it be given to Afghan refugees but not Americans?
Lying murderers.
10
posted on
09/05/2021 9:15:27 PM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: NoLibZone
How many people have died from taking Ivermectin for Covid?How many people have died from taking Ivermectin for any purpose?
Anyone.
Anyone at all.
11
posted on
09/05/2021 9:18:32 PM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
To: Jane Long
What an obviously BIASED and proven UNSAFE position. These hacks should be locked up. Yes, it is criminal. Crimes against humanity.
12
posted on
09/05/2021 9:19:23 PM PDT
by
zzeeman
("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality." )
To: SeekAndFind
Forget the AMA. Most physicians in private practice won’t and don’t belong. The majority of member physicians are government, academic and corporate employees who’s dues are paid by their employers. The Left found it very easy to take control of the organization. The AMA does not represent the best interests of practicing physicians or their patients.
To: SeekAndFind
Right to the point!
On what basis does AMA demand use only within a clinical trial for ivermectin, but call for virtually universal vaccination outside of controlled trials, despite FDA warnings of potential cardiac damage in healthy young patients, and no information about long-term effects?
14
posted on
09/05/2021 9:22:39 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“Criminal democrats kill babies. Do you think anything else is a problem for them?”)
To: Navy Patriot
Yeah, but gunshot victims can’t get treated because the hospitals are all full of Ivermectin overdoses! [yes, /s]
15
posted on
09/05/2021 9:24:25 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“Criminal democrats kill babies. Do you think anything else is a problem for them?”)
To: max americana
The issue is not ivermectin. The issue is the revolution.
16
posted on
09/05/2021 9:26:24 PM PDT
by
Thommas
(The snout of the camel is in the tent.)
To: SeekAndFind
Big pharma owns the AMA. They’re terrified doctors will follow the science and ivermectin will be approved for treatment of the Wuhan virus.
17
posted on
09/05/2021 9:28:41 PM PDT
by
Spok
(Those who can compel you to believe absurdities can compel you to commit atrocities.)
The AMA is a prime example of why...
The medical community is a cult
18
posted on
09/05/2021 9:29:14 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: SeekAndFind
These people are not doctors they are political stooges and they should not be allowed to practice medicine or give medical opinions.
To: NoLibZone
[[How many people have died from taking Ivermectin for Covid?]]
5,000,000, but they were all given HCQ afterwards and are doing fine now
20
posted on
09/05/2021 9:30:07 PM PDT
by
Bob434
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson