Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/07/2020 9:00:32 AM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: NoLibZone

The right to travel freely is a white racist concept.

Welcome to your Communist homeland.


2 posted on 07/07/2020 9:02:25 AM PDT by cgbg (Masters don't want slaves talking about masters and slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

“What is the term and law that prohibits the stopping of cars on the streets as the rioters do?”

Does it matter? They are allowed to go as wild in the streets as they wish.


3 posted on 07/07/2020 9:03:48 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

You should do your own spell-checking instead of trusting any software spell-checker.


4 posted on 07/07/2020 9:04:09 AM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

https://twitter.com/SomeBitchIKnow/status/1280402269314351104?s=20


5 posted on 07/07/2020 9:04:53 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

I think it’s called kidnapping.


6 posted on 07/07/2020 9:05:12 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Texting and deriving.


7 posted on 07/07/2020 9:05:37 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

We are not allowed to protest their protests that are protesting us.


8 posted on 07/07/2020 9:05:50 AM PDT by SkyDancer (~ Pilots: Looking Down On People Since 1903 ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Trap us while we derive???

I can think of nothing worse then be trapped while deriving say the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus!


9 posted on 07/07/2020 9:06:17 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

They just ask if you are a Democrat. If you say yes, it’s move along. If no, prepare to get trashed.


10 posted on 07/07/2020 9:06:50 AM PDT by antidemoncrat (uff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Could be kidnapping. Also assume there is a law against hostage taking.


11 posted on 07/07/2020 9:07:09 AM PDT by beekay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Best not try that in Idaho.


12 posted on 07/07/2020 9:07:15 AM PDT by Noumenon (The fight's on. Let's not lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Let’s start with obstruction of traffic, move on to impersonating a police officer, roll to attempted assault and intimidation, throw in extortion and false imprisonment on top of all that.

That’s the way a Federal prosecutor would work it if say, he thought you were a Trump operative and he needed to bury you. But of course they only did that to a guy who said something they didn’t like and sent 29 FBI guys in SWAT gear to arrest.


14 posted on 07/07/2020 9:08:18 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Come on guys, this is a serious question.

What if the Original Poster wants to press charges?

I would like to know the answer too.
A response from anyone that knows will be appreciated.

Is it a misdemeanor? if so I could arrest the person under citizens arrest. Certainly I could take a cell phone picture of the guy, send it to the police and reference the appropriate criminal code.

Would you do it?


17 posted on 07/07/2020 9:11:13 AM PDT by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
"Authority is vested in those to whom it applies."

I have no intention of giving them that authority.

18 posted on 07/07/2020 9:11:18 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
Seldom stopped and entrapped when I derive.


19 posted on 07/07/2020 9:11:42 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
Essentially, it is false arrest or false imprisonment, or both.
The Legal Definition of False Arrest

False arrest is the unlawful restraint of a person’s freedom of movement. It can occur any time one person:

holds another individual against his or her will or takes another individual into custody without consent or without legal justification to do so.

It's important to note that any person can be liable for false arrest -- not just police officers.

What you have to prove can vary depending on the applicable law. Typically, however, the person bringing the lawsuit (the plaintiff) must show that:

the person they're suing for false arrest (the defendant) intended to confine the plaintiff the plaintiff was conscious of the confinement the plaintiff did not consent to the confinement, and the confinement was not otherwise privileged.

Let’s examine what each of these elements mean.

Intent. False arrest is an intentional tort. That means the person who committed it has to have done so purposefully.

There are other charges, such as blocking a roadway:

Civil lawsuits can be filed as well.

22 posted on 07/07/2020 9:12:15 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
I have a deram that we can one day derive safely, again.
24 posted on 07/07/2020 9:12:41 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

There are many wise and educated people on FR. Several times I have wondered about a science topic and received excellent replies.

Please, could someone give their expertly grounded opinions and knowledge of the topics I heard discussed on a Savage Nation show about 2 years ago? Savage’s personal attorney answered specific questions after the Portland drivers were surrounded and attacked.

From memory: Rioters trying to pull open the door means a direct threat to get you outside the car and kill you, so you may kill them. Another: Hitting the car with rocks, concrete pieces and hammers, plus kicking and yelling-—are not a legal reason to shoot them. Not an imminent danger to your life. This is all by my memory.

Note: We could go to prison for years if we choose wrong!

Big problem: Each City, village, county and state, plus the US have specific laws. Thus, stand your ground, never shoot, always ok to defend yourself.....are all in varied contexts.

We have a few seconds or up to five minutes to decide, in our car, feeling increasingly afraid and possibly with loved ones inside-——what we should do.


26 posted on 07/07/2020 9:14:05 AM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

What is this “law” thing you are talking about?


28 posted on 07/07/2020 9:14:15 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

On a side note, do have eye and hearing protection readily available for wear by all occupants whilst driving.
Just sayin’


29 posted on 07/07/2020 9:15:13 AM PDT by SakoL61R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson