Posted on 03/02/2020 7:20:34 AM PST by fishtank
Dinosaur DNA Found!
February 28, 2020 | David F. Coppedge
Deep-timers had a big enough problem with collagen and melanosomes. But DNA should be long gone. 75 million years? No way!
Could this be the last straw? For two decades now, especially since 2005, creationists have been challenging deep-timers (those who believe life is hundreds of millions of years old, and earth is 4.5 billion years old) with dinosaur soft tissue. Secular reports have been coming in regularly about soft tissue in fossils: feathers, melanosomes, collagen, various proteins, and materials in dinosaur bones that look like stretchy blood vessels and red blood cells. Evolutionists have been scrambling to find chemical mechanisms that might stabilize the molecules over deep time (see 18 Feb 2020 for latest attempt). They trot out their theories as proof that soft tissues can survive tens of millions of years, never taking seriously the creationist critiques, which include the fact that evolutionists themselves had already predicted that soft tissues could not survive anywhere near that long.
But DNA? Thats impossible. Sorry, Jurassic Park fans; DNA degrades way too fast. Evolutionists know that.
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
You’d think...
Clone it up!
There's always someone ready to tip over the apple cart and always a scientist who loves to play god.
Monster bird!!!!!!!!
Yes. The Chinese will try to make weaponized dinosaurs...
Just take blood samples from the candidates at the next Democrat debate.
worse one that sells car insurance!
Interesting.
Tyrannosaurs were more bird than reptile... that’s one hell of a big fearsome chicken, brother... :^)
Wicked, nasty critters, either way. Especially crocs.
Limu Emu!
Brave woman, Mary Schweitzer.
She did exactly what a scientist is supposed to do. Follow the data.
She and Jan Smit are heroes of mine. Her for reporting her findings, him for stepping aside and giving full credit to Luis and Walter Alvarez. He had done all the work, and had all the data, only a case of mono prevented him from reviewing the data and publishing first.
I hope that this doesn’t sound too dumb, but here goes...
I was watching a show the other day where anthropologists were tracing down mankind’s roots. They were showing that there is proof that one of mankind’s ancestors hunted buffalo because they had fossils of buffalo bones from a million years ago that showed tool marks. Buffalo identical to today’s. My thinking is, if mankind has supposedly evolved so much during this million year period, why didn’t the buffalo? Why would one organism be identical, or nearly so, after millions of years and another one supposedly change so drastically?
So what will they implant it in, a lizard or a bird?
“These animals, including dinosaurs, perished in the Flood only a few thousand years ago. “
What happened to the dinos on the ark?
LOL!
Wow....37 post and in before the Helen Thomas pic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.