Let's have a law on the books that says you are not allowed to put more than one clip in at a time (supposing you have an SKS or some such).
Posted on 02/13/2020 2:31:08 PM PST by Steve1999
Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden spoke in Hudson, New Hampshire, this week and told attendees that it is “rational” to prohibit “50 clips in a weapon.” Ryan Saavedra quoted Biden maligning the absence of “a rational policy” that makes it illegal to have “20, 30, 40, 50 clips in a weapon.” Also in Hudson, Biden intimated that gun owners who cling to their AR-15s and AK-47s are no match for the government. He made reference to gun owners who quote Thomas Jefferson’s statement on the tension that exists between free men and the rulers who wish to subjugate them, a statement that includes Jefferson’s observation that “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
“Biden intimated that gun owners who cling to their AR-15s and AK-47s are no match for the government.”
He’s quite correct about that.
Dog-faced! You forgot dog-faced!
Let's have a law on the books that says you are not allowed to put more than one clip in at a time (supposing you have an SKS or some such).
The only reason to disarm a peaceful people is to
enslave them against their will.
About as rational as limiting a stapler refill to 50 staples.
Is that a threat? Sounds like a threat to me. Is the government going to kill us all, Joe? With F-15s and Hellfire missiles? Hmmm. And you think we don't need guns?
This A$$hat needs a lobotomy.
The only reason to disarm a peaceful people is to
enslave them against their will.
Always remember, the socialist state does not consider
the criminal element a threat as long as they only steal
from the people.
That darned “people” word pops up everywhere in the Constitution.
Biden is finished. Democrats see what we see....an old, establishment grifter who is beyond his Use By date.
I’ve got clips
That jingle jangle jingle...
The fact they don’t understand what they are talking about and can’t figure out correct terminology disqualifies them from writing any laws on the subject.
I think it’s rational to ban firearms that have 50 of the “things that go up.”
Where’s the asian guy with the swiss-army assault rifle?
But he thinks nothing of havering 50 clips of young girls with summer dresses on mounting boys bicycles
You say 50, and I say 1,000. Now let’s compromise.
I think on the campaign trail...Joe has a box of WW II and cowboy western movies that he watches to chill out. Probably a lot of stuff before 1945.
I also oppose putting 50 clips into a weapon. It would simply be too heavy to use effectively.
To quote the great philosopher, Bugs Bunny: “What a maroon!”
The writer of the article and its headline does not understand the subject he or she is trying to write about.
The left just uses that to point out that only gun nuts know how technically wrong his statements are regarding guns.
“We know what he means, the fact that you know the knitty-gritty details and technical gun mumbo jumbo means you are the dangerous gun owner Joe is talking about!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.