Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin Potentially Mixed Up Structural Fasteners in Most F-35s
Airforce Magazine ^ | 01/30/20 | John A. Tirpak

Posted on 02/13/2020 7:01:34 AM PST by Enlightened1

Hundreds of F-35s could have the wrong fasteners in “critical areas,” according to the Defense Contract Management Agency. But F-35 builder Lockheed Martin says the problem may not need to be fixed.

“All aircraft produced prior to discovery of this [problem] have titanium fasteners incorrectly installed in locations where the design calls for Inconel,” the F-35 Joint Program Office said in an email in response to a query from Air Force Magazine. “Because of this, the engineering safety analysis of the issue has assumed that each critical F-35 joint was assembled with the incorrect fasteners.”

Inconel is an alloy of nickel and chromium, and is supposed to be used in places where greater strength and corrosion resistance are required, while the titanium bolts are used in areas where its strength and lightness helps reduce weight. Titanium, however, has a lower shear strength than Inconel.

Both fasteners are called “eddie bolts” and are similar in appearance except for a number stamped on them. The titanium bolts cost about $5 apiece, while the Inconel parts cost about $20 each. A Lockheed spokeswoman said the two parts are “very difficult to distinguish, visually.”

The Lockheed spokesman said an initial analysis concluded that “titanium has sufficient strength in locations that called for Inconel eddie bolts.” Another Lockheed official said components are built with “twice the strength specified,” but he did not specify whether this was the case with the titanium eddie bolts.

The JPO said analysis as of Jan. 9 concluded “that no aircraft operating restrictions or inspections are necessary at this time.” It added that “the JPO will release a fleet guidance report” at the conclusion of the Root Cause and Corrective Action (RCCA) analysis, now being performed by Lockheed. The DCMA said

(Excerpt) Read more at airforcemag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; inconel; lockheedmartin; military; structuralfasteners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2020 7:01:34 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Careful! Mixing up fastners IS a big deal.


2 posted on 02/13/2020 7:02:56 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Taxpayers want what we paid a fortune to get.


3 posted on 02/13/2020 7:03:43 AM PST by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Must give the pilots a lot of confidence.


4 posted on 02/13/2020 7:04:56 AM PST by riverrunner ( o the public,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Another Lockheed official said components are built with “twice the strength specified,”

At four times the cost.
Typical... although if there was to be a mistake, better it be stronger fasteners were used rather than weaker.

5 posted on 02/13/2020 7:06:00 AM PST by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Both fasteners are called “eddie bolts” and are similar in appearance except for a number stamped on them.

...

Obviously, it would take an enormous amount of resources to make them look different /s


6 posted on 02/13/2020 7:06:43 AM PST by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

And how much have taxpayers paid Lockheed for this model?


7 posted on 02/13/2020 7:07:19 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

“A Lockheed spokeswoman said the two parts are “very difficult to distinguish, visually.””

And apparently no one thought to put a little paint on one so they could tell the difference


8 posted on 02/13/2020 7:07:29 AM PST by nuconvert ( Warning: Accused of being a radical militarist. Approach with caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Both fasteners are called “eddie bolts” and are similar in appearance except for a number stamped on them. The titanium bolts cost about $5 apiece, while the Inconel parts cost about $20 each.

...

That’s the cost to LM. What did LM charge the taxpayer?


9 posted on 02/13/2020 7:08:21 AM PST by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Duct tape can fix this right up.


10 posted on 02/13/2020 7:09:23 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
The Lockheed spokesman said an initial analysis concluded that “titanium has sufficient strength in locations that called for Inconel eddie bolts.”

Tell me then, Mr Lockheed, why did YOUR design call for a heavier and more expensive bolt?

11 posted on 02/13/2020 7:10:19 AM PST by Arones (When Leftists are in a minority, then they look for other ways to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Curious how they "accidentally" used the cheaper bolts in lieu of the more expensive, stronger bolts, and not the other way 'round.

One thing I've found rather odd in life is the frequency of "mistakes" that work to the benefit of the party making them.

12 posted on 02/13/2020 7:12:46 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Don’t worry, it will only cost a couple billions to fix.


13 posted on 02/13/2020 7:14:48 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

14 posted on 02/13/2020 7:15:16 AM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arones

Probably because the bolts are intended for areas exposed to high temperatures and corrosive gases, as the article indicates...


15 posted on 02/13/2020 7:15:44 AM PST by RitchieAprile (available monkeys looking for the change..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Amen. It’s highly likely the stronger fasteners are needed at critical failure areas such as wing joints. LM should be made to pay for this inexcusable foul up and make inspections & take corrective action on the entire fleet ASAP.


16 posted on 02/13/2020 7:15:59 AM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
"The titanium bolts cost about $5 apiece, while the Inconel parts cost about $20 each."

$15 per bolt profit explains why they both have the same name and extremely similar appearance.

17 posted on 02/13/2020 7:22:11 AM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881
In a just world LM would be given an opportunity to do this. Or else!
18 posted on 02/13/2020 7:34:09 AM PST by null and void (The democrats just can't get over the fact that they lost an election they themselves rigged!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
Seen one or two of those during my career. 🚀😁
19 posted on 02/13/2020 7:34:49 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

There are many different grades of Inconel and Titanium alloys.
Considering the application they most likely spec’d Grade 5 Titanium and Inconel 725.
The properties wrt the various strengths are very similar with one exception being the category of Ultimate Strength where the Inconel has a 20% advantage.


20 posted on 02/13/2020 7:35:03 AM PST by ocrp1982 (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson