Posted on 05/28/2019 11:37:21 AM PDT by Swordmaker
Monitoring software used by The Washington Post on an ordinary iPhone found that no fewer than 5,400 app trackers were sending data from the phone in some cases including sensitive data like location and phone number.
Its 3 a.m. Do you know what your iPhone is doing?
Mine has been alarmingly busy. Even though the screen is off and Im snoring, apps are beaming out lots of information about me to companies Ive never heard of. Your iPhone probably is doing the same and Apple could be doing more to stop it.
On a recent Monday night, a dozen marketing companies, research firms and other personal data guzzlers got reports from my iPhone. At 11:43 p.m., a company called Amplitude learned my phone number, email and exact location. At 3:58 a.m., another called Appboy got a digital fingerprint of my phone. At 6:25 a.m., a tracker called Demdex received a way to identify my phone and sent back a list of other trackers to pair up with [ ]
In a single week, I encountered over 5,400 trackers, mostly in apps, not including the incessant Yelp traffic. According to privacy firm Disconnect, which helped test my iPhone, those unwanted trackers would have spewed out 1.5 gigabytes of data over the span of a month. Thats half of an entire basic wireless service plan from AT&T.
The report does need to be viewed in context, however.
App trackers in context
First, while there is much breathless reporting of data being sent to companies like Google and Facebook, the vast majority of it is innocuous. Its simply developers using app analytics services provided by these companies, and they are learning things like which app features people do and dont use.
Second, the Privacy Pro app that The Washington Post was using to monitor the tracker traffic was provided by a company that would like to sell you in-app purchases to block this traffic, so the company concerned has a vested interest in making the situation sound scarier than it is.
This is your data. Why should it even leave your phone? Why should it be collected by someone when you dont know what theyre going to do with it? says Patrick Jackson, a former National Security Agency researcher who is chief technology officer for Disconnect [ ] I know the value of data, and I dont want mine in any hands where it doesnt need to be, he told me.
There are several answers to that first question.
Most app tracking is legitimate
Necessity: some apps need to be sending tracking data in order to function. That Uber or Lyft car can only collect you if it knows where you are, for example.
Immediate user benefit: Many ecommerce and credit card apps use a variety of signals to detect fraudulent transactions, for example, and its in all our interests to block misuse of our cards.
Indirect user benefit: The more an app developer can learn about the way that real users interact with their app in the real world, the better they can make the app. Features that are used frequently can be prioritized for enhancement over ones that arent, and there are in-app behaviors that can identify problems with the functionality or user interface. App trackers play a key role in software quality.
Ad-serving: Yep, no-one likes ads (well, maybe some), but whatever we think of them, they make it possible to enjoy everything from free apps to free websites. If we want those things to continue to be free, its in our interests to at least have the ads we see be relevant ones.
But Jackson does make two good points about app trackers. First, transparency.
[His] biggest concern is transparency: If we dont know where our data is going, how can we ever hope to keep it private?
With literally thousands of trackers transmitting data, its simply not practical for anyone to monitor that traffic and figure out which uses are legitimate and which arent.
Second, clear consumer protection policies.
To him, any third party that collects and retains our data is suspect unless it also has pro-consumer privacy policies like limiting data retention time and anonymizing data [ ]
The problem is, the more places personal data flies, the harder it becomes to hold companies accountable for bad behavior including inevitable breaches.
Jackson may be angling for an Apple acquisition.
Jackson suggests Apple could also add controls into iOS like the ones built into Privacy Pro to give everyone more visibility.
But the point is a fair one. Apple does more than anyone else to protect user privacy, but this is an area where its impossible for users to get any kind of steer on whats really going on under the hood. We either need Apple to do more, or for the law to do so
If I put my Galaxy 5 down on my desk at, say, 85% battery and leave it there all day it barely loses any batt life. If I start a walk down Broadway in NY at 85% in an hour it’s almost dead.
I noticed significant drain last week. I stopped all the apps, especially messenger. Battery now lasts 100x as long.
Ten years ago I was watching a group of 20 or so yutes on the sidewalk at the beach all walking together. Every one of them had a cell phone pasted to the side of his face. I wondered if they were talking to each other like maybe they had forgotten how to talk without electronics.
Your smartphone is never off, even after you turn it off. From the article:
The SCREEN is off.
Like a computer, even in sleep mode, its still on and running background tasks.
Powering off the phone will stop all activity.
You done good 👍
I have to mail a check every so often.
Android apps do the same things with sending out data only a lot worse. Apple has severe locks on user privacy that Android does not enforce.
Watch a couple of kid setting in a booth texting each other using speech to text.
Also makes you wonder if the “journalist” in question allowed all permissions. For example, apps now are required to give the option of whether an app can have access to your location (location services). They are required to ask for permission when you first launch the app. Further, you can turn off data to individual apps, as well as change the location services permissions at any time.
Oh yeah... Shep Shep... I take his word.
Im an actual engineer pal but please continue wearing your tinfoil hat.
On an iPhone powering it off, powers it off. Multiple studies have proved no radio signals in or out. Its off, Jim.
I have been in high tech for a long time - Microsoft, Apple, US Gov, Cyber Crime organizations protecting major financial companies around the globe.
If you give people control of admin access and something they can take power over other people with out you knowing about they will abuse it massively. People are very sneaky and will stab you in the back if they get power and or money.
There is more going on with your super computers in your pocket, purses and night stands than you realize.
That’s why I don’t have one....................
How can we load our I-Phones with false data to mess with them?
If you don't ever NEED prompt communication and never expect to be in any emergency situation, you don't need one. Until you do.
There have been a couple of times, but they are so ubiquitous, all I had to do was ask someone..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.