Posted on 05/21/2019 8:54:08 PM PDT by EdnaMode
For impatient travelers, the next wave of air transportation could be a game-changer. Aerospace company Hermeus Corporation recently announced that it has obtained funding to pursue development of a plane that could travel five times faster than the speed of sound, getting passengers from New York to London in just 90 minutes. But it won't be a cheap flight, and the idea isn't without some baggage.
The venture, which was founded by former employees of private space travel companies like Elon Musks SpaceX and Jeff Bezoss Blue Origin, is seeking to craft a plane that can travel at Mach 5 and reach a cruising speed of 3300 mph.
That ambition will likely take years to materialize. Hermeus co-founder and CEO AJ Piplica told CNN that development is projected to last a decade. He anticipated one-way tickets will cost in the range of $3000.
It currently takes about seven hours to travel from New York to London. Previously, travelers were able to cut that time down to roughly four hours, traveling at twice the speed of sound in the supersonic Concorde jet. High fuel consumption and expensive tickets led to the retirement of the aircraft in 2003. Whether Hermeus can overcome the environmental concerns of such high-octane travel and gather enough passengers willing to pay a premium for less time spent in the air remains to be seen.
it has obtained funding to pursue development of a plane that could...
Yes, your story is very, very typical.
I’m north of Atlanta by a little bit. ANYTHING within 7-8 hours drive from my house is faster to drive than go by parking + checkin + security + flight wait time + get-in-plane-time + actual flight time + get off plane time + luggage pickup time + rental car wait time + drive-to-site time.
Actual flight time may be only 2 or 3 hours of an 8-11 hour travel day.
Agree!
Plus I do my best thinking while driving.
And I forgot to mention that you are now advised to allow nearly 2 hours to pass through security. So boring...since all TV’s play CNN only, it usually requires less time to pass through security, so more time wasted sitting around.
The boarding procedure on planes makes no sense. The front seating passengers including first class board first. Which means the rear of the plane passengers must pass through an obstacle course people standing in isle trying to shove their carry-on luggage into the overhead bins. Why not load in reverse sequence from rear to front.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.