Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Photograph Of RBG New York Times Used About RBG Returning to Supreme Court Taken Last November
Twitter ^ | 02/16/18 | Jordan Sather

Posted on 02/17/2019 4:19:33 PM PST by Enlightened1

The photograph of RBG that the New York Times used in their report yesterday about RBG returning to the Supreme Court was actually taken last November. I've still seen no current photo. Too sick to have a picture taken of her? Where is she, actually?

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: chat; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; lied; mediawingofthednc; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashills; photo; presstitutes; rgb; scotus; smearmachine; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Enlightened1

Yet not one single photo...

Everyone has a camera on the phone these days, and still.... NO PHOTOS???

Why no photos???
*******************************************************

If she is okay then they may be baiting Trump to say something deemed ‘disrespectful’ about her and usable by the media to further attack him. Then she shows live somewhere the next day.


61 posted on 02/17/2019 5:55:43 PM PST by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

pretty much


62 posted on 02/17/2019 6:00:41 PM PST by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
...RBG returning to the Supreme Court...one last trip to say goodbye?......
63 posted on 02/17/2019 6:04:12 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

She probably has returned to the Court but pictures of her with the two big attendants holding her up.


64 posted on 02/17/2019 6:17:05 PM PST by arthurus (o0O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chode

“Where is Kennedy?”
Which one lady?


65 posted on 02/17/2019 6:20:25 PM PST by Farmer Dean (168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Baby Ruth has on more rings than a telephone.


66 posted on 02/17/2019 6:26:12 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
Easier to use an old photo then to use a current doctored photo.

I'm guessing she looks horrible. It would probably be disturbing to liberals to see just how frail and sick she is right now. And that's saying a lot, since she looked pretty frail before the lobectomy (auto correct tried to put lobotomy here, but that was done decades ago). So the press just won't take or publish pictures of her looking so poor.

67 posted on 02/17/2019 6:26:24 PM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
“She was at the USSC last Friday in a private hearing”

Private viewing, did they mean?

At what point do we take Omoeba's advice and just slip ol' Granny a pain pill?


68 posted on 02/17/2019 6:31:14 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
> Mate, that justice wouldn’t VOOM if you put 1000 volts through it.

:).

69 posted on 02/17/2019 6:35:48 PM PST by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LIBERALS RUIN EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I don’t wish her any harm.

But I do not trust the ComDems AT ALL.


70 posted on 02/17/2019 6:39:00 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: montag813
The journalistic standard is to say (File Photo) if the photo is not current. The NYT did NOT do this, but actually captioned the photo "R.B.G. returned to the Supreme Court on Friday"


Then the photo violates good journalistic standards, which NYT has been doing for decades.

Most of their readers would not care. They are fellow progressives.

71 posted on 02/17/2019 6:53:19 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie ("The MSM is the enemy of the American people"...Democrat Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ETCS

You are injecting reality into a conspiracy theory. That takes all the fun out of it.


72 posted on 02/17/2019 6:56:11 PM PST by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
heh heh heh heh...
73 posted on 02/17/2019 7:20:08 PM PST by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

OH? I’ll look at the link.


74 posted on 02/17/2019 7:28:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Of course that rotten POS shall do just that.


75 posted on 02/17/2019 7:30:27 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Even after she’s dead and buried, she won’t be officially dead until it’s almost election time in 2020. Heck, she might already be dead, but we won’t be allowed to learn of her death until the ‘right time’.

The many old photographs of RBG will come in handy for the next 1 1/2 years.


76 posted on 02/17/2019 7:31:59 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Doesn’t court open on Feb 19th?
Let’s see if she shows up.


77 posted on 02/17/2019 7:35:11 PM PST by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This is becoming deception on a grand scale.

Supreme Court justices can be impeached. It might behoove some conservative congressperson to threaten to introduce articles if Weak Bladder Ginsburg doesn’t physically present herself and prove she’s fit to hold the office.


78 posted on 02/17/2019 7:37:15 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I’m going to need proof of life for any case she votes on. This super secret stuff is ridiculous.


79 posted on 02/17/2019 7:40:42 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

As long as John Roberts is Chief Justice, good luck on that.


80 posted on 02/17/2019 7:48:27 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson