Skip to comments.
Once Robots Are Self-Aware, We Should Full-On Merge With Them, Says Michio Kaku
Curosity ^
| 03/19/18
| Cody Gough
Posted on 03/20/2018 3:56:24 PM PDT by Enlightened1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Bratch
With his chin in the air like that Dr. Frankenstein reminds me of Barak Obama!
41
posted on
03/20/2018 4:43:54 PM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
To: Enlightened1
“self-aware”...
I don’t think that means what you think it means.
42
posted on
03/20/2018 4:46:59 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: Scrambler Bob
They will have to join AIAI I love it!
To: ctdonath2
He's talking about a century or so from now.
A lot can happen in a century.
44
posted on
03/20/2018 4:50:33 PM PDT
by
x
To: Scrambler Bob
You are forgetting Evolution.
No I'm not!
The discussion is about "humans" creating robots or computers with intelligence higher than ours.
So, can you tell me how "evolution" created humans and/or any species with intelligence? Progressively larger or progressively more complex brains. And, what makes for "awareness" of self or other beings or things?
Is intelligence about "emotions" too?
45
posted on
03/20/2018 4:54:05 PM PDT
by
adorno
To: Ciaphas Cain
My thoughts exactly. Hopefully, resistance isn’t futile.
46
posted on
03/20/2018 4:54:52 PM PDT
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Enlightened1
Just another reason Silicon Valley is a hard place to work
47
posted on
03/20/2018 4:58:05 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: x
I’ve watched half a century go by.
I’ve watched AI go from “Game of NIM” to Watson, Siri & Alexa take IQ tests.
I’ve studied AI as a bright-eyed software engineer.
AI, as we do & will know it, is nothing more than searching data graphs for an objective criteria - a mechanical process.
That’s. It.
“Self-aware robots” aren’t happening with the technology we have, nor will have in the next 100 years.
They may become staggeringly efficient in searching vast data for complex criteria.
They will NOT be “self aware”.
48
posted on
03/20/2018 5:02:45 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
To: Enlightened1
49
posted on
03/20/2018 5:14:21 PM PDT
by
samtheman
(LetÂ’s elect as many Republicans as possible in 2018)
To: Enlightened1
Isaac Asimov wrote the series “Foundation” which depicted the rise of and rejection of androids in Earth’s future.
Even with his belief the end would be utopian, I rejected it because a wise and benevolent droid saves humanity by turning us into a symbiotic universe without individuality. Daneel the droid of note and another, Gaskin changed the laws of robotics on there own to better the good of their humans. Oh yeah, Daneel perfect himself by merging with a human child.
50
posted on
03/20/2018 5:17:21 PM PDT
by
WePledge
( Semper Fideli)
To: Enlightened1
I don't believe a software program will ever become "self-aware."
I believe there is a quantum-mechanical element of consciousness/self-awareness that can never be recreated on a computer.
Just as quantum phenomena require a conscious observer, a conscious observer requires quantum phenomena.
51
posted on
03/20/2018 5:19:16 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
To: ctdonath2
Indeed.
Lots of foolish talk on the subject of late.
52
posted on
03/20/2018 5:19:27 PM PDT
by
KEVLAR
(Liberty or Death)
To: TADSLOS
53
posted on
03/20/2018 5:28:00 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: samtheman
54
posted on
03/20/2018 5:35:05 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: WePledge
I thought it was Giskard that rejected the “Zeroth” law?
55
posted on
03/20/2018 5:35:45 PM PDT
by
Don W
(When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
To: Enlightened1
56
posted on
03/20/2018 5:37:31 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
To: Enlightened1
Let me guess. This Kaku is an atheist - or at best, not a God-fearing person.
To: neverevergiveup
Or, as a product of the mind of Man, learn his most basic skill: deception.
58
posted on
03/20/2018 5:54:29 PM PDT
by
Aevery_Freeman
(Truth comes in few words; lies require more.)
To: OrangeHoof
So conversation with a sex robot would be like a perpetual “who’s on first?” routine?
59
posted on
03/20/2018 6:03:32 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(13 Russian Facebook trolls ... and a Siberian partridge in a Russian Olive tree.)
To: Enlightened1
Japanese scientists are hard at work helping humans “merge” with robots.
60
posted on
03/20/2018 6:03:59 PM PDT
by
Dr.Deth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson