Posted on 12/15/2016 8:00:37 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Greens and technically challenged scribes apparently believe that battery-powered cars and planes are exciting new clean “zero-emissions” vehicles.
There is little new about batteries – battery-powered cars were running on British roads over a century ago. They were pushed out of the market by internal combustion engines.
Batteries just store energy made elsewhere, and all have a finite life. Every battery needs primary energy and resources for production, recharging, replacing, and recycling, and every step produces its own emissions.
Batteries require lots of expensive raw materials – lead, calcium, nickel, cadmium, lithium, hydrogen, plus ancillary copper, steel, zinc, aluminium, and plastic. All need primary energy like coal or gas for mining, manufacture, construction, recharging, and recycling plus coking coal for smelting metals. Even wind and solar are not emissions-free once construction, maintenance, and life-cycle replacement are fully accounted for.
All cars, even green ones, need road maintenance using bitumen, concrete, and diesel-powered machinery, all costing money and producing emissions. Green cars also need recharging stations, demanding more metals.
Batteries have an important place in our lives. But they are not “emissions free.”
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Gee! You mean all the energy put in them doesn’t just come magically from Gaia and Green Nonpolluting Mother Earth? Quelle surprise.
Batteries are not made from unicorn poop? Who knew?
The only clean green battery I know of is based on the potato.
No they come from the energizer bunny don’t you know? ;)
No.
Up in Canada there are mining and smelting companies that have tall smokestacks that take the pollution and spread it far and wide. The land downwind is ravaged from the pollution.
The metals are used among other things are for “clean” batteries.
The metal is taken by train to the west coast then by ship to Japan where it is turned into batteries then shipped back. Your “clean” electric car is then plugged into a wall jack that leads to a power plant. That power plant is either coal, oil, gas, nuclear or “clean” bird chopping windmills or frying birds on the fly solar power plants.
Every car has a battery - as in an energy storage device.
My battery stores potential energy in gasoline. It recharges in minutes, has a 350 mile range, and weighs 150 lb. And it lasts practically forever, without losing capacity to store energy.
Some cars have propane batteries, some natural gas, a few radical concepts store compressed air.
And then some store electrical energy - take hours to charge, weigh 800 lbs, and lose their ability to store energy over time. It is possibly the worst type of battery to power a car.
I use a lot of rechargeable batteries in various forms. but, even with “high end” chargers to pamper the batteries, care in usage (don’t run them all the way down, often), selecting good brand names to use, etc., few last the number of rated recharge cycles.
Of course, reliability CAN be had: The Opportunity rover on Mars is STILL working, over 50 times over its planned lifetime. I don’t think I’d want to have to pay for those batteries for my own use, though!
Pretty good summation, my friend.
It cannot power a pacemaker.... see that at 4:05
Prof Protons Science Show + Potato Clock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIjjGrJHSIo
“Green” is one of the great hoaxes of all time.
Hemp Battery - Almost Unbelieveable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcK9JSxVNUc
Not to say the author doesn't make good points in this piece.
Batteries do provide very useful purposes, per the author even, even in vehicles that require huge amounts of energy...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.