Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Streisand to Obama: Appoint Supreme Court Justice Now
WND ^ | November 15, 2016 | Chelsea Schilling

Posted on 11/16/2016 1:42:32 AM PST by BlessedBeGod

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: Tennessean4Bush

Yes. Marshall law would involve Mr. Dillon.


61 posted on 11/16/2016 4:07:36 AM PST by gogeo (That's my Trumpy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Oh.... ewww... that picture....

Liberal women are so utterly gross, physically. I have no idea how even their weird neutered males can stand to mate with them.


62 posted on 11/16/2016 4:14:33 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

Why on earth did James Brolin marry that?


63 posted on 11/16/2016 4:15:45 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (GO TRUMP! Drain the swamp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
Marshall Law

;)

64 posted on 11/16/2016 4:17:58 AM PST by Salamander (This Is Who We Are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Barbra Streisand, World Renown Constitutional Scholar
and Authority, Provides Advice To Lame Duck President


65 posted on 11/16/2016 4:19:19 AM PST by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
And the voice of another of the botox addled old-bags of the California elite is heard.

Yesterday, Barbara Boxer introduces a Congressional Bill to do away with the Electoral College - as if a provision in the Constitution can be discarded without a Constitutional Amendment.

Today, Streisand urges that a Supreme Court appointment be made without the “advise and consent” of the Senate - as if another provision of the Constitution can also be discarded without a Constitutional Amendment.

There must be some exclusive rehab center to treat such Totalitarian-Liberal dementia.

66 posted on 11/16/2016 4:20:40 AM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“A recess appointment can be made without Senate confirmation.

Its only temporary and expires within two years or whatever the term limit is of the appointment.

A recess appointment doesn’t put a nominee on the Supreme Court for life.”

All true. But given that Mitch McConnell has ensured that there hasn’t been a Senate recess since Justice Scalia died, and will ensure that there isn’t one prior to noon on January 20, President Obama won’t be able to name even a temporary Justice.

I’ve had many differences with Senator McConnell through the year, but I’ve got to admit that he’s proven to have balls of steel in dealing with the Supreme Court vacancy. I never thought that Senate Republicans would stay firm and not only stay in session throughout, but also refuse to hold hearings on Obama’s nominee. Mitch McConnell deserves credit for this, as does Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who stayed firm despite being up for reelection in a state that voted twice for Obama (and twice for Bill Clinton).

May all Senate Republicans show this much spine in the crucial battles coming up over the next few years.


67 posted on 11/16/2016 4:21:11 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Sorry Babs - Scotus getting ready to move to the right for the next 25 years or so because of the timing of Trump’s Presidency.....


68 posted on 11/16/2016 4:26:59 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Not exactly, Venezuela has the launching pad to get her to Jupiter, her Final Destination ...


69 posted on 11/16/2016 4:28:05 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor

My goodness. It’s Ms Choksondik.


70 posted on 11/16/2016 4:34:25 AM PST by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

What do you care Babs? You’re leaving the U.S., right?


71 posted on 11/16/2016 4:35:10 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Bork you, Barbara.


72 posted on 11/16/2016 4:44:33 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

Oh pleeeeeze! Was it really necessary to post a picture of that ugly witch?


73 posted on 11/16/2016 4:45:26 AM PST by redfreedom (The nation has been saved. Thank you Dear Lord. Long live President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Plumberman27

Trumps first move should be to appoint a judge and then immediately after that he should ask that ginsburger be removed since she made a political comment and voiced her opinion during the election. Even though she apologized the damage was done to her and she should be forced out.


Not to mention the POLITICAL comments she’s made SINCE the election.

This bag needs to go!


74 posted on 11/16/2016 4:58:24 AM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

LOL....poor, old Babs probably thinks she played one (World Renowned Constitutional scholar) in a movie.


75 posted on 11/16/2016 4:59:31 AM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
I believe several of the leftist Supremes could be forced off of the court for conflict of interest rulings. Kagan, for example, should have recused herself from ruling on gay marriage, since she is openly gay.
76 posted on 11/16/2016 5:04:31 AM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Hey Streisand, I’ll quote a hero of yours : “Elections have consequences. I won. “


77 posted on 11/16/2016 5:07:26 AM PST by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

Not holding hearings means they rejected him. Get over it Barbara


78 posted on 11/16/2016 5:10:20 AM PST by stockpirate (OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
Babzie never heard of the constitution.

Heard of it, yes. Cares about it, no.

And since when did 0bama care about the Constitution?

79 posted on 11/16/2016 5:13:04 AM PST by wastedyears (Clinton's supporters crying is the best thing ever..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

I must have missed the part of the constitution that said “advice or consent of the senate unless Barbra Streisand thinks otherwise”....


80 posted on 11/16/2016 5:15:03 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson