 |
I'll post this with the transcript tomorrow. Thanks, grey_whiskers!
Posted on 10/17/2016 9:20:16 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
https://twitter.com/youngdems4trump/status/752960915444633601
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
And “this” is a video of “what?”
You do realize it’s impolite to not describe what might wind up being a long video link, right?
I dont mean to be impolite. This bit is from here, about hour and five minute mark or so.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?412315-101/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-part-2
Charles McCullough III CAN YOU PROVIDE THIS COMMITTEE IN A SECURE FORMAT THE CLASSIFIED EMAILS?
>> I CAN TO A CERTAIN EXTENT. I CANNOT PROVIDE A CERTAIN SEGMENT OF THEM BECAUSE THE AGENCY THAT OWNS THE INFORMATION FOR THOSE EMAILS HAS LIMITED THE DISTRIBUTION ON THOSE, SO THEY ARE CHARACTERIZING THEM AS OR ORCON.
>> EXPLAIN THAT.
>> ORIGINATOR CONTROL. I CAN'T GIVE THEM TO YOU WITHOUT AGENCY'S PERMISSION TO PROVIDE YOU.
>> WHICH AGENCY?
>> I CAN'T SAY THAT IN OPEN HEARING, SIR.
>> YOU CAN EVEN TELL ME WHICH AGENCY WON'T ALLOW US AS MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO SEE SOMETHING THAT HILLARY CLINTON ALLOWED SOMEBODY WITHOUT A SECURITY CLEARANCE IN A NONPROTECTIVE FORMAT TO SEE, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> THIS IS THE SEGMENT OF EMAILS -- THIS IS WHY MY LETTER BACK TO RANKING MEMBER CUMMINGS HAD TO BE CLASSIFIED BECAUSE PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS SEGMENT OF EMAILS AND THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE NOT JUST WITH YOU AND YOUR COMMITTEE BUT WITH SEVERAL MEMBERS AT THIS POINT. SO WE HAVE GONE BACK TO THE AGENCY THAT IS INVOLVED SEVERAL TIMES AND WE CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT AGAIN AND ASK PERMISSION.
>> CAN YOU GENERALLY TELL ME -- BECAUSE THEY ARE SO SENSITIVE ABOUT SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE, HUMAN INTELLIGENCE? WHAT?
>> WE SHOULDN'T GET INTO THE CONTENT OF THESE EMAILS IN AN OPEN HEARING.
>> OKAY. I DON'T WANT TO VIOLATE THAT BUT THE CONCERN IS IT HAS ALREADY BEEN VIOLATED AND WAS VIOLATED BY HILLARY CLINTON AND IT WAS HER CHOICE, SHE SET IT UP AND SHE CREATE THIS PROBLEM AND SHE CREATED THIS MESS. WE SHOWN HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS BUT SHE DID THAT.
>> THIS IS THE SEGMENT OF EMAILS THAT I HAD TO HAVE PEOPLE IN MY OFFICE WRITE INTO PARTICULAR PROGRAMS TO SEE THESE EMAILS. WE DIDN'T POSSESS THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES.
>> EVEN THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DIDN'T HAVE THE CLEARANCE?
>> YES.
>> UNBELIEVABLE. WHAT A MESS. I'LL YIELD BACK. JUDGE FROM MARYLAND,
Show Less Text
01:06:45
they should just ask Putin what the emails were all about. I’m sure he knows.
Dear gawd, the rabbit hole of Clinton’s corruption goes so deep it is like the energizer bunny lives there, it keeps going and going...
Oh yes, this is all the Russians’ fault, doncha know!
well, if you leave classified intel on an unsecured server, you can be pretty sure that there are multiple foreign intelligence agencies privy to the classified information just like we would be if the roles were reversed.
|
I'll post this with the transcript tomorrow. Thanks, grey_whiskers!
PFL
bookmark
thanks for the link!
ping to JudyInCanada
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zglYnfDnmBk&spfreload=10
here’s Mr Chaffetz, at the congressional hearing on the emails. He’s flabbergasted at the situation.
Thanks for the ammo.
Ask yourself;
WHAT power can stop legal FOIA requests and stop the agencies that PROVIDE the information that complies with a FOIA request ?
None other than the POSOTUS
Bookmark
If it didn’t disgust me so much, I would say “awesome!”, but this does. Thank you for posting.
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.