Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How One Scientist Decoded the Mysterious Sounds of the Northern Lights
Live Science ^ | October 12, 2016 06:48am ET | Tom Metcalfe

Posted on 10/13/2016 5:13:18 AM PDT by BenLurkin

For more than 15 years, a lone scientist in southern Finland has spent countless winter nights among the snowy fields and frozen lakes around his village, in pursuit of one of the most ephemeral mysteries of the heavens: the faint, almost phantasmagorical sounds heard during intense displays of the aurora borealis, or northern lights.

The epic study by acoustician Unto K. Laine includes the first audio recordings of the muffled crackling or popping sometimes heard overhead during spectacular aurora displays.

...

Laine has shown the sounds are real, and he thinks he has found what causes them: sparks of electricity discharging beneath the aurora in an inversion layer of the atmosphere that can form in clear and calm weather conditions.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: aurora; finland; northernlights

1 posted on 10/13/2016 5:13:18 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Here's an explanation as to what causes the various colors of an Aurora.

________________________________________

Auroras result from emissions of photons in the Earth’s upper atmosphere, above 80 km (50 mi), from ionized nitrogen atoms regaining an electron, and oxygen atoms and nitrogen based molecules returning from an excited state to ground state.[33] They are ionized or excited by the collision of particles precipitated into the atmosphere. Both incoming electrons and protons may be involved. Excitation energy is lost within the atmosphere by the emission of a photon, or by collision with another atom or molecule:

oxygen emissions
green or orange-red, depending on the amount of energy absorbed.
nitrogen emissions
blue or red; blue if the atom regains an electron after it has been ionized, red if returning to ground state from an excited state
.

Oxygen is unusual in terms of its return to ground state: it can take three quarters of a second to emit green light and up to two minutes to emit red. Collisions with other atoms or molecules absorb the excitation energy and prevent emission. Because the highest atmosphere has a higher percentage of oxygen and is sparsely distributed such collisions are rare enough to allow time for oxygen to emit red.

Collisions become more frequent progressing down into the atmosphere, so that red emissions do not have time to happen, and eventually even green light emissions are prevented.

This is why there is a color differential with altitude; at high altitudes oxygen red dominates, then oxygen green and nitrogen blue/red, then finally nitrogen blue/red when collisions prevent oxygen from emitting anything. Green is the most common color.

Then comes pink, a mixture of light green and red, followed by pure red, then yellow (a mixture of red and green), and finally, pure blue.

Auroras and the ionosphere

Bright auroras are generally associated with Birkeland currents (Schield et al., 1969;[34] Zmuda and Armstrong, 1973[35]), which flow down into the ionosphere on one side of the pole and out on the other. In between, some of the current connects directly through the ionospheric E layer (125 km); the rest (”region 2”) detours, leaving again through field lines closer to the equator and closing through the “partial ring current” carried by magnetically trapped plasma. The ionosphere is an ohmic conductor, so some consider that such currents require a driving voltage, which an, as yet unspecified, dynamo mechanism can supply. Electric field probes in orbit above the polar cap suggest voltages of the order of 40,000 volts, rising up to more than 200,000 volts during intense magnetic storms. In another interpretation the currents are the direct result of electron acceleration into the atmosphere by wave/particle interactions.

Ionospheric resistance has a complex nature, and leads to a secondary Hall current flow. By a strange twist of physics, the magnetic disturbance on the ground due to the main current almost cancels out, so most of the observed effect of auroras is due to a secondary current, the auroral electrojet. An auroral electrojet index (measured in nanotesla) is regularly derived from ground data and serves as a general measure of auroral activity. Kristian Birkeland[36] deduced that the currents flowed in the east-west directions along the auroral arc, and such currents, flowing from the dayside toward (approximately) midnight were later named “auroral electrojets” (see also Birkeland currents).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora#Causes_of_auroras

2 posted on 10/13/2016 5:26:00 AM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; ETL

Wow, this is awesome!

A welcome break from all that other stuff.

Seeing the Northern Lights is a big goal of mine, but being warm is also a big goal of mine, and I was told the Lights are a winter phenomenon.

So sadly I must live vicariously through articles like these.


3 posted on 10/13/2016 5:31:54 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

"Drink...more...Ovaltine...mitä???"


4 posted on 10/13/2016 5:34:44 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Hillary's screeching voice is like the pipe organs of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
For more than 15 years, a lone scientist in southern Finland has spent countless winter nights among the snowy fields and frozen lakes around his village, in pursuit of one of the most ephemeral mysteries of the heavens: the faint, almost phantasmagorical sounds heard during intense displays of the aurora borealis, or northern lights.

At least HE had something to do.........

5 posted on 10/13/2016 5:38:01 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (If only Hillary had married OJ instead......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan
Believe it or not, the first and only time I've ever seen them was in New York's Central Park. I had been an amateur astronomy for over 10 years previously and heard and read a day or so before that they might be visible as a result of an especially energetic flare (or CME?) from as far down as the New York City area. So I went out to try from a relatively dark area of CP, the path that surrounds the Great Lawn baseball fields, an area where we, I and a few friends, at the time, regulatory held free astronomy viewing sessions for the public.

And there it was, a faint shimmering red curtain of light! You could even make out Earth's magnetic field lines! From Manhattan!! Couldn't detect any other colors, though. Still, I will never forget it.

The photo below is the closest thing I could find to what I saw...

As I was looking at this and others photos of the aurora, I just now realized that the red light seems to always appear at the top. This may explain why I only saw red light from the comparatively low latitude of NYC. The green and other light was probably below the (northern) horizon.

6 posted on 10/13/2016 6:26:14 AM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ETL

I had been an amateur astronomy = I had been an amateur astronomer


7 posted on 10/13/2016 6:27:20 AM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Way cool.


8 posted on 10/13/2016 7:16:17 AM PDT by Ciexyz (After eight years of Obama, I can't afford to buy nothin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

They are a sight to behold. Erie, surreal, Heavenly. God’s color pallet.


9 posted on 10/13/2016 7:32:12 AM PDT by V K Lee (U TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP to TRIUMPH Follow the lead MAKE AMERICA GREAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVsONlc3OUY


10 posted on 10/13/2016 8:01:00 AM PDT by GOPJ ("Actions speak louder than words." Juanita Broaddrick on the current hougTtrump dust-up...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Tesla


11 posted on 10/13/2016 8:03:12 AM PDT by GOPJ ("Actions speak louder than words." Juanita Broaddrick on the current Trump dust-up...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson