Posted on 07/07/2016 6:47:27 AM PDT by DBCJR
Hillary Clinton Can NO longer Hold Any Office.
18 US code 2071 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. Hillary Clinton deleted 30,000 State department emails that were on her personal email server.
So, the FBI let her skate on a), how's she gonna prevail on b)?
The Constitution contains all the qualifications for president. Congress may not add to those qualifications through statute.
Then our Owners start having to explain why those laws don't apply to THEM.
Killary would need to be convicted on the charges before these statutes kick in...
She'll just claim an 'oops - didn't mean to'....
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE......
the law....???
pfffft
for you ..... not MEEEEEEEE
SPECIAL ......SO F**K*NG SPACIAL ....
i cant imaging how anyone could vote for this treasonous criminal reptile
This is exactly what I’ve been wondering about. She may not be going to jail, but she darn well will be losing her ability to get any kind of secret clearance. Let alone holding an office in the US gov’t.
That all goes away if she is elected president.
RUDY Juliani said with what she’s done she couldn’t get a security clearance
The way I understand this is:
Because she was never indicted, she is not guilty of any crime...
Without being indicted, she is as free as you and I and it is up to the House of Representatives to decide if she can have security clearance...
Because she wasn’t indicted, there is not a limit on the ‘crimes’ so therefore, when Trump goes into the Oval Office, he can have his A.G. indict her, bring her before a Grand Jury and from there it will go to trial...
Obama cannot pardon her, she wasn’t charged with anything...
Even the Constitutional requirements are being ignored these days.
Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same,[etc.]
**Except Hitlery
You need to have your eyes checked. Can’t you read? It says, right there in the statute, “Whoever, except Hillary Clinton...”
A country that twice elected an ineligible person to the presidency isn’t going to care that hillary is ineligible.
She would have to be impeached and convicted as Secretary of State (the Congress can do this to a FORMER Secretary of State) in order to be barred from holding the office of the Presidency.
“Obama cannot pardon her, she wasn’t charged with anything...”
False. Ford pardoned Nixon, who had not been criminally charged with anything.
She should not be given any security clearance. Does anybody know who determines whether or not she can continue her security clearance?
CONCLUSION Comey's contradictory statements actually did not let Hillary completely off the hook. Comey pitched out a sharp-edged boomerang that's slicing back to cut Hillary to pieces.
=============================================
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY: After the ’70s, the digital revolution pushed cultural trends in the opposite direction of centralized power with everything becoming more niche-oriented, decentralized and personalized.
This revolutionary change puts “unprecedented power in the hands of every individual,” according to Harvard’s Nicco Mele.
It’s “a radical redistribution of power that our traditional institutions don’t and perhaps can’t understand.” As if that wasn’t enough, he adds, “Radical connectivity is toxic to traditional power structures.”
NOTE: means we, the people, now have the power.
Wasn’t he impeached, and quit before they could do anything?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.