Posted on 06/15/2016 5:17:32 AM PDT by xzins
"Remember the October Surprise and remember Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." - Rush in 2003
Let's turn the left's own crap back on them.
Yeah, but the 30.06 isn't SCARY LOOKING!
How many more of my rights do I have to give up to make this country safe for Muslim immigration?
I listened to one law enforcement type the other night say that a rifle in that nightclub setting wouldn’t be nearly as effective as a couple of pistols. I tend to agree.
Not for even a second do I think they want to ban rifles because of mass murders.
They are going after the people’s ability to defend themselves in battle.
All of them.
I listened to him last night, I normally don’t and I had to change the channel when I heard his “logic” based on total lack of Firearms basics and terminology, and I am a freakin’ novice in this arena and I know way more about the subject he did. How many Millions will he influence with his ignorance?
With thousands and thousands of miles of coastland, with drones, with millions of shipping containers, it is not necessary for a terrorist organization to even blink if the USA imposes some kind of weapons ban.
Any foe with half a brain can figure out a way to get weapons into a country.
They managed EASILY in Paris.
O’Really is a legend in his own mind.
His commentary last night was an attack on the 2nd amendment. I assume he knows that, but sometimes I do think he has a huge blind spot in terms of correctness. He wants so much to be liked.
O'Reilly is immune to persuasion. He has his own personal set of facts and conclusions, and they are all immutable.
Which goes a long way towards proving that they EXPECT to engage in battle.
The government is determined to control the public, and it will disarm the public, period. If the targets are not average people, if the targets are celebrities, politicians, any government functionary, the government response to disarm the public will be swift, and it will be violent.
O’Rly has always been an ass. He’s part of the Fux News problem.
If your side is Globalist Elite, sure.
I haven’t watched him since he tried to get an 0bunghole interview. Because when he got that interview he dropped to his knees in front of oturdburgler and slopped it all up.
bill o is a POS.
ya don’t get to be called 0’pinhead fer nuthin’!!!!!!
******************************************
No rifles are much better. If pistols were better don’t you think our Special Forces would use them for entry and room clearing?
Rifles are a much more accurate natural feeling extension allowing the shooter a much better chance of hitting the target.
BOR has one and only side....
Whatever promotes BOR...
Unfortunately, millions of people actually believe he is some sort of populist commentator...
"looking out for the little guy"
If it paid better to be a progressive libtard, BOR would be as progressive as they can get...
I think it was a comment from Bo Dietl (Diedl sp?)
Nothing like a terrorist attack to separate the sheep from the goats. All the anti-American pukes are whining for more “gun control”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.