Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilley Pushes Assault Weapons Ban
Opinion ^ | 15 Jun 16 | Xzins

Posted on 06/15/2016 5:17:32 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 06/15/2016 5:17:32 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

O’Reilly told Trump the other night there’s no evidence that refugees are infiltrated by terrorists.

Ooops....Paris attackers.


2 posted on 06/15/2016 5:17:48 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
O'Blowhard agrees.


3 posted on 06/15/2016 5:19:16 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I get really tired of this pompous preening assclown and his not so pithy BS. He has never been on the defending side of the 2nd amendment. Which shouldn’t need defending but because of assclowns like this, we must defend it.


4 posted on 06/15/2016 5:20:36 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

As long as the terrorists are only hitting the average hoi-polloi, this will be the typical governmental respsone.


5 posted on 06/15/2016 5:21:29 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Falafel Boy is unwatchable. Ignorant, arrogant bloviator.


6 posted on 06/15/2016 5:21:29 AM PDT by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Just another idiot who doesn’t use them or know the difference between an automatic and a semiautomatic who’s grandstanding for attention because his ratings are low.


7 posted on 06/15/2016 5:22:11 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bill O’Reilly is a draft-dodging weakling blowhard. He not only doesn’t know squat about weapons, he doesn’t care at all about anything further than three feet around him. He has his millions, he has bodyguards - why should he care?


8 posted on 06/15/2016 5:22:25 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Good thing we don’t listen to mewling quim/GOPe traitors.


9 posted on 06/15/2016 5:23:25 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yeah - and Gretchen Carlson put up a live tweet poll on her show and seemed a bit taken aback when over 80% of respondents disagreed with re-instituting the “assault weapon” ban.....


10 posted on 06/15/2016 5:23:54 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Channeling one of my favorites, Ted Nugent:

“Suck it, Bill!”

What a moron.


11 posted on 06/15/2016 5:24:04 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Trump '16! Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Just another in a long line of deep thinkers...


12 posted on 06/15/2016 5:24:54 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack

I could not believe my ears what bill was saying the other night.

I am not a regular watcher and will never be.

And this guy is on our side?

Not. Seems like the only thing we do have is that our Founders, indwelt by God, knew to write that spectacular document(s) which, 240 years later, is the only thing we have to protect us from tyranny.


13 posted on 06/15/2016 5:26:24 AM PDT by Uversabound (Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins

All this discussion about purpose, characteristics and capability aside, I don’t give a damn. It is no one’s right to question what I need a damn gun for. I don’t have to justify it for varmints, target practice, turkeys, boars or anything! I have a right to own what I want and to carry it. The Second Amendment affirms this right and if it is taken away, then they will indeed have a purpose and use.


14 posted on 06/15/2016 5:26:59 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No need for any of the gun control crowd to worry. Pretty soon the new open relations with Cuba will make illegal automatic weapons more available and cheaper, especially in Florida.


15 posted on 06/15/2016 5:27:26 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Bill isn’t smart enough to figure out what the liberal code is.

Assault Weapon: Any firearm.

Sensible gun laws: There will be no guns.

Remember when all the federal agencies were buying up rounds of ammunition by the trainload? Ammo shortages at retail stores?


16 posted on 06/15/2016 5:29:31 AM PDT by Texas resident (Democrats=Enemy of The United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Who is going to stand for us? Only us. It is rapidly approaching the point, and passing it, that Sir Winston Churchill alluded to when he said, If we won’t fight when we can win, we will surely have to fight when there is no chance of winning. Our only purpose of fighting will be to die as free men, rather than slaves. I did not put quotation marks around the former because it is not Churchill’s quote. It was my paraphrase of it.


17 posted on 06/15/2016 5:32:23 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins

O’Reilly showed his ignorance on several fronts. He said we should declare war on Islamic Terrorism because it would allow the military to get more involved in fighting terrorism, the military would have more freedom to detain and interrogate suspects like Mateen.

Since Mateen was operating in the US, clearly O’Reilly was referring to using the military within the United States. Obviously, O’Reilly isn’t aware of Posse Comitatus which precludes using the military in law enforcement. And, yes, unless the military declared martial law, that would be a violation. BTW, you can’t declare martial law if the courts are in session. So, essentially, O’Reilly is saying we should close the civilian courts for the duration.


18 posted on 06/15/2016 5:38:12 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack

I haven’t watched that liberal moron in years. Haven’t watched Faux for a long time either. It is clear their Saudi owners are telling them what to say.


19 posted on 06/15/2016 5:38:30 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sport

If Trump goes ahead of Hillary in the polls after each terror attack, don’t expect elections to be held. The Rats will go for broke, and there will be an “emergency” that does not permit elections.


20 posted on 06/15/2016 5:39:06 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson