Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian heritage sites wiped from UN climate report at government's request
foxnews.com ^

Posted on 05/27/2016 10:03:14 AM PDT by BenLurkin

The “World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing Climate” was released Thursday and lists 31 natural and cultural world heritage sites in 29 countries that are said to be vulnerable to climate change. Risks to iconic tourist sites such as the Statue of Liberty, Venice, Stonehenge and the Galapagos Islands are described in the report.

However, no sites in Australia, such as the famous Great Barrier Reef, are mentioned. News.com.au reports that the initial version of the report included references to the Great Barrier Reef as well as the Kakadu National Park and the Tasmanian Wilderness.

...

The Australian Department of the Environment confirmed to News.com.au that it asked for references to Australia to be removed, citing a negative impact on tourism.

“Recent experience in Australia had shown that negative commentary about the status of world heritage properties impacted on tourism,” it said, in a statement. “The department was concerned that the framing of the report confused two issues — the world heritage status of the sites and risks arising from climate change and tourism.”

...

U.S. sites listed in the U.N. report include the Statue of Liberty and Yellowstone National Park

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Travel
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/27/2016 10:03:14 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The Aussies don't want International designation
as they wish to retain their own soverignty.
Once you let the UN get a foothold into your country ,
they want to tell you what resources you can use , and how to use them. and not looking out for the interests, or soverignty of the host country.
For example : AGENDA 21
2 posted on 05/27/2016 10:19:40 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt ( British historian Arnold Toynbee - Civilisations die from suicide, not by murder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Stonehenge?

What on Earth could possibly ‘endanger’ a bunch of rocks.


3 posted on 05/27/2016 11:02:56 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

All I want is a nice flat spot on one of them to spray paint my name onto.


4 posted on 05/27/2016 11:06:43 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

The Aussies are full on Global Warming wankers. They just don’t want to deter tourism by allowing people to get misunderstood idea that the list of impacted heritage sites are already destroyed, so there’s no reason to go there.


5 posted on 05/27/2016 12:24:56 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
Americans


6 posted on 05/27/2016 6:55:17 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson