Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Incredible testimony. Hopefully this has been addressed. Why am I not surprised?
1 posted on 02/29/2016 2:51:32 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

Here is the video,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eER3oha8q2U


2 posted on 02/29/2016 2:51:45 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
The timing of this deposition was just after George W Bush being re-elected president of the United States. We are not surprised that this never made it into the main stream media.

Actually, I believe that it would have been the contrary. The long knives were out for Bush because of the USSC Florida decision. So much so in fact there were at least two newspapers that actually got the ballots from the whole state and went over them one by one to prove the case of hanging chads and fraud......you never heard about it because the end results were that Bush won Florida, fairly.

If anything, I'd believe that the 'testimony' was suppressed by Democrats because that would be right up their alley.

3 posted on 02/29/2016 2:55:21 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

How is this a secret? Anything that can be programmed one way can be programmed another way.
You put as many safeguards and checks in place as possible, like anything else done with programs and hope for the best, just like everything else.
People act like there was never any fraud or cheating in elections before this..


5 posted on 02/29/2016 3:07:52 AM PST by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

They really want Snowden for stealing next years election results. ;-)


7 posted on 02/29/2016 3:11:01 AM PST by r_barton (GO TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Paper ballots. God forbid we wait some extra time for actual results.


8 posted on 02/29/2016 3:11:25 AM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Really ? Do you think?/s


12 posted on 02/29/2016 3:46:30 AM PST by ghosthost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Not surprised.


13 posted on 02/29/2016 3:47:14 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

This is what I am afraid of, massive voter fraud.


14 posted on 02/29/2016 3:48:51 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

These electronic voting machines can be programmed any way the Supervisors of Elections want them to be. The Democrat Party used them in 2008. They used them in 2012 and they will use them in 2016 to put Hillary in the White House.


15 posted on 02/29/2016 3:50:05 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

There are so many dirty tricks you can do with electronic devices! The most common I see is the screen calibration trick. If you fail to calibrate it, certain parts of the screen will be off slightly when you touch the screen. So your button press will actually select the candidate above or below your intended selection.

Elections should be a manual process with the ballot box always in view and witnesses allow to stand nearby and watch the vote count at the end of the day. This way everyone can witness the actual count for each precinct. Even if they lie when reporting the precinct numbers to election HQ, it would be caught.


16 posted on 02/29/2016 3:50:36 AM PST by bigtoona (Lose on amnesty, socialism cemented in place forever Trump is the only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

“US ELECTIONS RIGGED”

Well duh. As if this is news today?


17 posted on 02/29/2016 3:55:36 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Gee whiz Wally, who’da thunk it. Can you say Obama? I knew you could.


25 posted on 02/29/2016 4:28:34 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

I’ve known they were rigged for years.
Nothing else would explain how the roll book that I sign every election in order to vote can have my daughter’s signature on the line above mine, since she moved to another state 22 years ago.


26 posted on 02/29/2016 4:35:40 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Slavery will continue to exist and thrive as long a Islam continues to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

obama 2012


32 posted on 02/29/2016 4:54:29 AM PST by ldish (Have had enough...you??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

I tecall reporrts of people saying the system switched their votes at the end.

I think this is how Obama won the swcond time


33 posted on 02/29/2016 4:58:15 AM PST by stockpirate (UNLEASH THE TRUMPIAN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

There is another sinister thing that the socialists use is not getting ballots to our active military in time to vote.

It may be a something Trump could address early on to make sure it doesn’t happen again.


36 posted on 02/29/2016 5:08:52 AM PST by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1
Optically scanned ballots. One scanner per precinct makes it affordable. Inexpensive suitcase tables make it affordably scalable for anticipated voter turnout. Paper ballots make hand recounts both possible and credible.

Touch screen voting was never a good idea because they are the opposite. Expensive machines means too few during anticipated heavy voter turnout periods, and a lack of paper makes a hand recount impossible.

38 posted on 02/29/2016 5:13:24 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Others have said it, it’s conventional wisdom:

If voting mattered, do you think “they” would let us do it?


39 posted on 02/29/2016 5:21:54 AM PST by normbal (normbal. somewhere in socialist occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson