Actually, I believe that it would have been the contrary. The long knives were out for Bush because of the USSC Florida decision. So much so in fact there were at least two newspapers that actually got the ballots from the whole state and went over them one by one to prove the case of hanging chads and fraud......you never heard about it because the end results were that Bush won Florida, fairly.
If anything, I'd believe that the 'testimony' was suppressed by Democrats because that would be right up their alley.
Yep and they probably used it in 2012.
I think it’s good to always keep both a paper trail and a computer tally. That way they can avoid people trying to steal elections.
Reminds me of an old quote,
“The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” -Joseph Stalin
Right. Even if the vote rigging had favored Republicans in this instance, it is far more prevalent and systematized in use by Democrats who would not care to jeopardize their operations. I do not expect the Republicans to win the vote count. To do so they would have to have a majority of the popular vote so massive(70% of the legitimate vote or better) that the Democrats would not dare to alter that lest they be all hanged from lamp posts. Anything less will pass because the Republicans WILL NOT protest the rigging formally as they have agreed in court to never question Democrat vote fraud.