Posted on 11/12/2015 9:36:28 AM PST by don-o
I doubt this is typical of Texas legal procedure. --
Typical or not (and I submit that mass indictment of 100+ people for the same crime is not typical, anywhere), the Texas courts are agreeing with and supporting the DA. 100% of the times the complaint was challenged, the courts found that it contained probable cause specific enough to the accused. I predict that the Texas courts will find the indictment sufficient, too.
In other words, Texas courts endorse leveling of charges with less than necessary specificity, and intimidation of innocent people to cop a plea in order to extract themselves from Texas legal process.
The ATF self-described “official” Twitter account (@batf) stated they were present.
I Rted that statement several times to friends of mine. The account is gone. It has been replaced by a bogus account by same name. Old activation date, no tweets, 6 bogus followers.
And I tweeted this article to @WacoPolice (Sgt Swanton’s account) soon after the shootings took place:
Militarization Is More Than Tanks and Rifles: It’s a Cultural Disease, Acclimating the Citizenry to Life in a Police State
Less than an hour after I did, the author’s website link disappeared. Got a 404 error message (it was still on a number of other sites in total) It later re-appeared on the author’s website with a different link (the above link).
I have a copy of the Google Cache version of the original article link showing it did exist and was removed.
Next day, @WacoPolice blocked me from their account. Along with that, my tweets concerning them disappeared. (that is normal when account is blocked)
This was not a local run operation.
No, never was a Pinelander
I agree.
Did you follow the Wisconsin abuse of the John Doe prosecution of the staff of governor Walker?
It finally was ended after years of weaponization of the legal system there against political opponents.
I see similarities here.
Here is the best coverage on the mess in WI.
They did an excellent job of covering the subject from several years.
http://watchdog.org/series/wisconsins-secret-war/
Not closely, but did from time to time.
-- It finally was ended after years of weaponization of the legal system there against political opponents. --
Most of the abuse there was search and seizure of evidence.
-- I see similarities here. --
To the extent that DA and courts perpetrate and facilitate corrupt practices, yes. The courts in Wisconsin were part of the problem.
Here is a motion in an unrelated Texas case, arguing that defendant's indictment was deficient. It cites numerous precedents. Few accused will have the resources, expertise and desire to poke holes in corrupt legal practices perpetrated by prosecutors with the help and endorsement of courts, and courts/judges give prosecutors total leeway in fixing deficient charges. The longer the falsely accused is in the legal system, the better. The worst that comes to the prosecutor and judge is an admonishment. Absolute immunity.
You are not the only one that has noticed and cataloging shift stories.
That is very unfortunate. Aren't judges "elected"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.