Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Star Trek Beyond’ Wraps Filming
Star Trek News | TrekNews.net ^ | October 16, 2015 | TrekNews.net

Posted on 10/16/2015 11:10:23 AM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: discostu; Perdogg; Impy; BillyBoy

You’re breaking my heart, Stu. I don’t care if numbnut reviewer/JJ Abrams fanbois galore luv it and if it makes a billion bucks, it will never be Star Trek. It’s a Faux Trek abortion with moronic scripts that destroy 5 decades of canon at will, teeny-bopper actors that insults our intelligence, and vomit-inducing lens flare. Faux Trek I was insulting enough, Faux Trek II: Into Dorkness with pasty-face missing Walton cousin Benedict Cucumberpatch as Khan was the coup de grace.

This franchise is nothing but a Star Wars fan doing everything he can to piss all over Star Trek like a bad SNL skit. I’d sure love to see what a vicious Trekker could do to the Star Wars franchise if given hundreds of millions to do it (if George Lucas hadn’t beaten them to the punch by ruining it himself with the prequels).


41 posted on 10/16/2015 1:22:45 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Before my son, a former Marine, went to Afghanistan I took him to Philly to see the Liberty Bell, Independence Hall and the Franklin Institute. They just happened to have the Next Generation bridge and other parts of the set on display. As an infant he fell asleep during the re-runs and probably still watches when he can. Picard is who he liked the most. I liked Warf.


42 posted on 10/16/2015 1:23:02 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

You think it’s Faux Trek. Many other love it. And you don’t get to decide what is and isn’t Trek.

What’s funny is that you apparently saw the second one. You knew you’d hate it, but you saw it anyway. And we both know you’ll see the next. The constant complainer section of fandom is always the same. They see things just to bitch about them. It’s like dropping a hammer on your foot just to complain about gravity. Since everybody knows you won’t like it DON’T WATCH IT. That’s what normal sane people do. I knew I wouldn’t like the Man from UNCLE movie, so I didn’t watch it.

Complainers are the most idiotic and annoying of fans. They give fen a bad name. Really the cure is simple:
just
don’t
watch
it.

And don’t post about it. People who come onto threads just to tell people how much they hate the subject are just twits.

You’ll find your life a lot more enjoyable if you stop spending so much time on things you hate.


43 posted on 10/16/2015 1:28:03 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I don’t THINK it’s Faux Trek, it IS Faux Trek. It’s a farce and bears no resemblance to the show I grew up with whatsoever. Teenage children pretending to be adult MILITARY officers ? WTF ?!? Wesley Crusher on TNG was bad enough (and sent off before long), but a shipload of Wesleys ?

I watched “Into Dorkness” to see how bad it would be (since how could I review it if I didn’t see it ?). It was not only awful, it was epic ridiculousness across the board. That was not Khan. This movie was so horrible that I had a dream that the late Ricardo Montalban showed up in my kitchen and told me how angry and offended he was at what they had done with his signature character. It reminded me of when they had some blonde actor playing a blonde Ming the Merciless in a recent “Flash Gordon” production. It’s appalling and a slap in the face to fans.

You can slap a name on anything, you can call the resident of the White House “President”, but it doesn’t make it so.


44 posted on 10/16/2015 1:48:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Again, you don’t get to make that call.

You watched #2 because the complainer crowd feels the desperate need to watch what they know they won’t like so they can complain.

The only people getting slapped in the face are the people who WANT to. You could have not watched it. But you did.


45 posted on 10/16/2015 1:51:56 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Well, Stu, I made the call. Just because you love a steaming, non-canon, turd and abortion of the Star Trek franchise doesn’t mean the rest of us do and will remain silent about it.

You remind me of the leftist moonbats that tell Conservatives if they don’t love and worship Zero, they have no right to criticize or complain. Get over yourself, Stu ! (BTW, are you JJ Abrams mother or something ?)


46 posted on 10/16/2015 1:57:06 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

bkmk


47 posted on 10/16/2015 1:59:23 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Chris Pine is the same age Shatner was when the original series began.


48 posted on 10/16/2015 2:00:32 PM PDT by LexRex in TN ("A republic, if you can keep it.......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

It is canon. Once again showing how very much it is not your call to make.

I don’t give a damn what you love and worship. I’m just making fun of you for seeking reasons to complain and making stupid complaints. Paramount OWNS Trek, THEY decide what is and isn’t Trek. The fan base at best suggests whether or not they made a mistake. And the revenue picture on the last movies shows the fan base is totally cool with Paramount calling them Trek, REAL Trek, CANON Trek.

I’m not the one that needs to get over myself. You’re the one making declarative statements you have not the authority to back.


49 posted on 10/16/2015 2:06:34 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Is Alice “Bewbs” Eve in it?


50 posted on 10/16/2015 2:16:36 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Complaining is fun.


51 posted on 10/16/2015 2:24:19 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: discostu
It's not canon, it's crap. It's garbage, detritus, rubbish. Faux Trek. From the moment that canon-shredding vomitus hit the screen with all the subtlety of explosive diarrhea, there was nothing Star Trek about it. Not the stories (or rather, non stories, since it was so convoluted there was nothing that resembled a coherency or sense of logic), not the characters (children or teens play acting as grown military officers), not the settings (they managed to even f up the ships).

That you act so utterly hysterical defending this abortion really takes the cake, Stu. We get it, you love garbage. Faux Trek I: Booger Knights, Faux Trek II: Into Dorkness and the upcoming Faux Trek the Turd: Beyond the Pale. Well, you can revel in it like a pig in slop, but I won't be silenced by the current Star Wars fanboi losers pissing all over the premier science fiction creation. Thank you and have a nice day, Stu. You can go pound your head into the keyboard now.


52 posted on 10/16/2015 2:28:23 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Is Alice “Bewbs” Eve in it?

Apparently not, but you never know. :)

Wikipedia

IMDb

Memory Alpha

53 posted on 10/16/2015 2:29:26 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Impy

It has its place. As a QA engineer I’m a well paid professional complainer. But there’s that breed of complainer in fen that are just silly about it. They’ll watch years of a TV show just so they can tell everybody how bad the show sucks. They’re probably Yelp reviewers too (#southpark).


54 posted on 10/16/2015 2:29:36 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

No it is canon. You don’t own the series bible. Paramount decides what’s canon.

The hysterics are all you. You’re that animation. I’m just poking the dancing bear because it’s funny.


55 posted on 10/16/2015 2:31:04 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Boogers and ***!

Have you seen “Moonbeam City”? It’s weird, I like it.


56 posted on 10/16/2015 2:34:17 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I’ve seen the commercials. Kind of looks very Archer. Haven’t gotten around to the show.


57 posted on 10/16/2015 2:35:30 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: discostu
"IT'S CANON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Stu, to quote Shatner, "Get a life !"

58 posted on 10/16/2015 2:45:31 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Man you just get funnier every time. You of all people throwing out the Shatner quote.

BHAHAHAHAHAHA

Follow your own advice. Get a life. And Paramount says it’s canon. Again, not your call to make.


59 posted on 10/16/2015 2:46:47 PM PDT by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

And DS9 is by far my favorite series. And it did make it to reruns, Spike showed it for a long time.


60 posted on 10/16/2015 5:03:35 PM PDT by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson