Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WashPost Fixes Multiple Errors in Story on Pelosi and Human Baby Question But Notes Only One…
Cybercast News Service ^ | October 2, 2015 | 3:38 PM EDT | Michael W. Chapman

Posted on 10/03/2015 3:22:00 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Several hours after posting a news story with several errors, including in the headline—about a CNSNews.com reporter asking Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) a question about human life—The Washington Post fixed the errors in the story by reporter Kelsey Snell but only noted one “correction” at the story’s end in the changed copy.

On Thursday, Oct. 1, CNSNews.com reporter Sam Dorman attended Pelosi’s weekly press conference at the U.S. Capitol and asked her, “In reference to funding for Planned Parenthood, is an unborn baby with a human heart and a human liver a human being?” […]

In Kelsey Snell’s story posted at 12:14PM at The Washington Post’s PowerPost, the headline incorrectly read, “Nancy Pelosi shut down an abortion protestor’s question in a press conference.” There was no “abortion protestor” at the press conference; the question was asked by a CNSNews.com reporter, who is credentialed with the U.S. Capitol. […]

Given the errors in the story, The Washington Post fixed them. In a repaired version on Thursday, the new headline read, “Nancy Pelosi shut down a reporter’s abortion question in a press conference.” […] However, even the new lead (and headline) is misleading because the question was not about Pelosi’s “views on abortion.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abortion; babykillers; california; carlyfiorina; demagogicparty; districtofcolumbia; election2016; memebuilding; nancypelosi; partisanshill; partisanshills; pelosi; samdorman; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Full title: WashPost Fixes Multiple Errors in Story on Pelosi and Human Baby Question But Notes Only One ‘Correction’
1 posted on 10/03/2015 3:22:01 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Pelosi and the democrats say that the video’s were edited, does that mean that if they weren’t edited they would be horrible?


2 posted on 10/03/2015 4:46:52 AM PDT by Ouch (No B-HO in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouch

The fact is they are highly edited. The full unedited version is also available. So far, nobody who has seen both can say the highly edited version is inconsistent with the unedited version.


3 posted on 10/03/2015 5:07:57 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson