Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: We appeal to the court: End gag order in Waco bikers case
The Dallas Morning News ^ | September 1, 2015

Posted on 09/16/2015 12:37:23 PM PDT by don-o

snip

Then came a gag order in late June — approved by a judge who is also the DA’s former law partner. No wonder people are asking questions about what kind of behind-the-scenes cooperation is going on among judges, prosecutors and law enforcement in Central Texas.

We expressed concern in July after word came that longtime Waco police detective James Head would serve as foreman of the grand jury that likely will hear the shootout case. Can the bikers get a fair hearing under those circumstances?

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals could go a long way toward airing out this story by nullifying the gag order; it’s unclear how soon it will rule on that request. With so much suspicion permeating this case, the court would be wise to take the side of much-needed transparency.

snip

Among the information that authorities refuse to release are the results of ballistics test that would identify whose bullets struck the dead and injured. The Waco police chief says officers fired 12 shots after bikers allegedly shot at them. Each time authorities avoid providing that information, the impression grows that many of the victims were killed by law enforcement.

Also illuminating would be the law enforcement dash-cam videos, along with other recordings including those from a camera hidden to document goings-on of the biker event.

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2015 12:37:23 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: don-o
Conflict of interest ?
or just more of the "Good Old Boy" philosophy
without recusal ?
2 posted on 09/16/2015 12:42:49 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (The GOPe and Karl Rove got Obama elected twice. .. How'd that work out for ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Typo on date. Should be September 16


3 posted on 09/16/2015 12:43:27 PM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Is The Dallas Morning News a biker gang apologist blog?


4 posted on 09/16/2015 1:10:26 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

I didn’t refer to them, did I?


5 posted on 09/16/2015 1:11:32 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
I didn’t refer to them, did I?

You sure didn't. I'm calling you out directly.
6 posted on 09/16/2015 1:17:43 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

Have fun with that I guess.


7 posted on 09/16/2015 1:21:08 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: don-o

IBTG :^)


8 posted on 09/16/2015 1:23:15 PM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o; Robert Teesdale; All
Aptly and well stated. Even so, a line that got me was, "No doubt some of the bikers who showed up that Sunday afternoon in May at Twin Peaks had the worst of intentions."

Possible, yes. But probable? Not all by its lonesome. That's the thing -- it is all so far fetched for bikers in the full context, that it's puzzling. It looks fake.

I liked the comments, especially the second one by Mike Smith.

9 posted on 09/16/2015 1:23:45 PM PDT by Finny (Be ready to own what you vote for. Voting "against" is imaginary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

“...No doubt some of the bikers who showed up at Twin Peaks that Sunday afternoon in May had the worst of intentions. This newspaper wants to see justice served....”
******************************************************************************************************
The only thing in the article that is “negative” about the bikers is the first sentence in the above extract from the article. And that is, AT BEST, merely an assumption which may or may not be true. I wonder if the idiotic “authorities” in Waco are getting advice from Mike NiFong and Marilyn Mosby (Baltimore city State’s Attorney)?


10 posted on 09/16/2015 1:29:56 PM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Yep.


11 posted on 09/16/2015 1:43:15 PM PDT by Finny (Be ready to own what you vote for. Voting "against" is imaginary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Have fun with that I guess.

You, TexasGator, Ethan Clive Osgoode and others are delicious as a light snack.
12 posted on 09/16/2015 1:47:30 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

Guess we’re living rent free in your head.


13 posted on 09/16/2015 2:12:10 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: don-o

IBTGBAHA.


14 posted on 09/16/2015 2:16:00 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Section 20.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny

>>> “No doubt some of the bikers who showed up that Sunday afternoon in May at Twin Peaks had the worst of intentions.” <<<

Yeah, that sentence jumped out at me too. Too bad we don’t know the ‘intentions’ of the Waco cops and their ‘confidential informant’.


15 posted on 09/16/2015 2:19:52 PM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman; Robert Teesdale

Wow — that Boogieman is sure original! {^)


16 posted on 09/16/2015 2:41:01 PM PDT by Finny (Be ready to own what you vote for. Voting "against" is imaginary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JJ_Folderol; All
Too bad we don’t know the ‘intentions’ of the Waco cops and their ‘confidential informant’.

Dead men tell no tales -- nine who might have given insight into intentions in either direction, never will now.

And 117 individuals with formerly clean records, now has an arrest record reflecting a very serious charge.

Good luck to them on the next job application.

17 posted on 09/16/2015 2:49:21 PM PDT by Finny (Be ready to own what you vote for. Voting "against" is imaginary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Guess we’re living rent free in your head.

That would only be if I found any of you impressive.


18 posted on 09/16/2015 3:04:06 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: don-o

The court doesn’t have to order anyone to gag. They’re gagging already.


19 posted on 09/16/2015 3:36:26 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Something smells really rotten in Texas.....


20 posted on 09/16/2015 3:43:05 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson