Posted on 08/29/2015 10:05:08 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
:D
I like Palin, but she’s a walking lightening rod for the Looney-Left. If he has to pick a women, I’d rather see Carly Fiorina.
"Well, there are so many good potential female running mates out there, and male running mates."
That was Sarah's Quote, so thanks Examiner, when I want a melodramatic headline I will know who to turn to.
At this link are the Youtube Links to the Extra Interview: http://us4palin.com/sarah-palin-donald-trumps-2016-running-mate-see-it/
Well I disagree, Fiorina isn’t the same.
I see Sarah Palin as the real candidate from the year 2008. And she completely connects with a (LOT) of people out here in America.
Big time. Sarah Palin is FR. Donald I like, but I want to go on record as being enthusiastically for Sarah Palin as his running mate.
Just saying.
Personally I think Sarah is well qualified to be VP.
However she has been so heavily bashed by the media that she has been stigmatized and thus would represent a negative factor in the voters eyes to Trump’s campaign.
Regardless of my above thoughts, what trumps this (no pun intended) is I believe Cruz is much better qualified. I would pick Cruz over Sarah any day.
Should the powers that be think a female must run as VP, then I’d take Sarah in heartbeat over Carly. Sarah I trust, Carly is a RINO.
I disagree.
Palin would cement the votes of FReepers, still holding out against Donald.
In my opinion it is the ideal campaign. Perfect.
I want her at the head of the ticket. :)
On the other hand, Lindsey Graham and John Boehner have both bashed Trump.
I'm starting to see a pattern here.
Lindsey Graham needs to go back and ponder how he is going to have a rotating first lady if he becomes president.
I guess an issue is: should we really worry about how Sarah Palin has been bashed and bruised by the media and late night comedians, and should we say she can’t run for national office because of what the media thinks of her?????
In other words, do we want the liberal media to have veto power over who we as conservatives would like to see run for office????
Aside: The EPA is presently in no cabinet department. It needs to be dismantled, with its few positive functions being folded into the Department of the Interior.
Thank you Sir Lion. One or two FReepers are still keeping at least one eye peeled for Mrs. Palin’s public pronouncements.
She still has many many enemies at work (even this week) on FR, soooooo...
Others are watching her too...with a different perspective than you and I.
(Perhaps some in the press really do know they’ve been telling falsehoods about the demise of SP’s viability all along?)
I completely agree.
Palin has been subjected to a larger review than anyone this century. The came through it flawless.
Trump / Palin 2016.
And Trump isn't?
Governor Palin sat on the One America News set for an interview with Renee Bargh of Extra TV.
Of her experience guest hosting ‘On Point’, Palin expressed happiness for the opportunity to be returning to her "journalism roots".
The two talked 2016 presidential politics, with Bargh asking if the former VP nominee would be interested in reassuming that role. Palin brushed off the suggestion, indicating that there were many other qualified candidates.
She was asked about both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, the respective GOP and Democratic frontrunners. Palin gave kudo’s to Trump raising the issues that average Americans want to hear about.
Palin believes the media may be playing a game with Clinton, reporting somewhat aggressively on the email scandal, only so they may later claim down the road that they didn’t give Hillary a pass on the matter.
C4P has two video clips for viewing. First up is the broadcast version aired nationally by Extra TV. Second, a somewhat more in depth clip released online.
• Sarah Palin • Extra TV • 2016 • Donald Trump / Hillary Clinton • 8/27/15 •
FWIW.
Just changed my tagline.
I’d rather see his lawyer run as VP.
Too many perceived negatives.
Cruz or the Doctor would get the nod IMO.
Blow their minds and bring in Dick Cheney. LOL
The problem is your still looking at the next election the way the media wants you to look at it, who can get elected based on yesterdays criteria! This election has just two possibilities, an outsider who tells it like it is, or Bush - Clinton. Stop worrying about who’s electable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.