Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, the F-35 Can’t Fight at Long Range, Either
War is Boring ^ | July 9, 2015 | Joseph Trevithick

Posted on 07/10/2015 10:26:26 AM PDT by C19fan

The Pentagon’s new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is dead meat in a close battle against even a dated two-seat F-16D fighter jet, according to a scathing test pilot report War Is Boring obtained.

Don’t sweat it, JSF-maker Lockheed Martin responded. “The F-35’s technology is designed to engage, shoot and kill its enemy from long distances,” Lockheed’s F-35 team wrote in a press release on July 1.

(Excerpt) Read more at medium.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; lighting; stealth; warisboring
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
If it not obvious by now the writers at "War is Boring" are not big fans of the F-35.
1 posted on 07/10/2015 10:26:26 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

perhaps ... and even if they’re only exaggerating by only 50 %, then 50 % of their criticisms ARE legitimate ...


2 posted on 07/10/2015 10:35:06 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

The F-35 worries me.


3 posted on 07/10/2015 10:36:10 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Isn’t this a stealth craft? Isn’t it also VTOL? It looks to me like it has a good chance with the right pilot. If there’s an aviator, maybe they can say more.


4 posted on 07/10/2015 10:37:07 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

What do you expect ,The Pentagon is controlled by Obama and his Criminals


5 posted on 07/10/2015 10:37:08 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Did I read someplace that the AF wants to use this plane for ground support missions?

If that is the case how are they going to maintain the stand off distance harped above?


6 posted on 07/10/2015 10:37:46 AM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Not to mention lazy individuals who seem to divert from answering in favor of talking about how wonderful PC America is.


7 posted on 07/10/2015 10:38:44 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Could it be that we’ve reached the point of diminishing returns, technologically speaking, with fighter aircraft, and that, just maybe, this new generation (post F-15, F-16, F/A-18) are just hyper-expensive, hyper high-maintenance white elephants that don’t deliver any more bang for the buck, and maybe quite less, than the current generation?


8 posted on 07/10/2015 10:39:36 AM PDT by Bluewater2015 (There are no coincidences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

And when it’s armed up for close air support, the stealthiness is gone or at least severely degraded.


9 posted on 07/10/2015 10:47:33 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

There are some things you just don’t screw up, some lessons you can’t afford to learn the hard way. Air dominance is probably one of those things.


10 posted on 07/10/2015 10:48:24 AM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Well maybe there can be a bill to stop funding the F-35.

It’s a non-working, over priced and over hyped. .. .

Hmm... yeah not anytime soon I suppose. Guess as long as our AF is pitted against ISIS we’re okay though, as Iran I believe has F14’s. Don’t want to pick a fight with those.


11 posted on 07/10/2015 10:50:36 AM PDT by AmericanCheeseFood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluewater2015

I’m just a dumba$$ retired Soldier, but that is an interesting point.


12 posted on 07/10/2015 10:50:52 AM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The stand off “air to air” kills works great on paper. We did the same thing with the F-4 Phantom. The Navy/Marine and the first Air Force versions did not have guns. No guns necessary because we would get the kills from miles away. Then came the ROE. We had to visually ID the boggy before we could shoot.
13 posted on 07/10/2015 10:57:27 AM PDT by newbolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCheeseFood
as Iran I believe has F14’s. Don’t want to pick a fight with those.

Considering they are in pristine condition (or should be)
as they haven't flown in 30 years.

14 posted on 07/10/2015 10:59:01 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

What worries me is they stopped the F-22 to pay for the stealth flying pig. I would not be so worried about the F-35 if we F-22s than can dog fight and the F-35 would do the strike part.


15 posted on 07/10/2015 11:00:39 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Remember this "multi service fighter."


16 posted on 07/10/2015 11:04:32 AM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

and neither am I. It is an unethical boondoggle sponsored by Lockheed.

Can’t fight long range, can’t fight short range... just burns holes in the sky.

What a miserable POS.


17 posted on 07/10/2015 11:11:20 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

0bama shut down the f-22 and promoted the f-35

Do you need anymore information as to which is better for America?


18 posted on 07/10/2015 11:12:56 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Actually, they used to fly a lot. If they could find parts.


19 posted on 07/10/2015 11:14:03 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

A half-century ago it was said “The F-4’s technology is designed to engage, shoot and kill its enemy from long distances”.

They were wrong then, too.


20 posted on 07/10/2015 11:15:10 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson