Posted on 06/25/2015 9:10:12 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
Sorry it reduced your competence so dramatically. A first-year law student knows that the role of the Supreme Court is to rule on the legality of a law, not to interpret what it might say.
As the Chief Justice of the highest court in the land, you have irreparably damaged the legal system of the United States of America and the separation of powers between branches.
The chaos that will ensue will render our our entire legal system useless, and have the potential to bring about the collapse of our entire way of life.
Benjamin Franklin tells us that a free nation requires men of virtue. You, sir, have abandoned virtue for the cause of politics. You have no business serving in, much less leading the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
Is there a way to depose this traitorous b-atch?
So this is what a ‘soft’ coup looks like...
I wish there was.
This news shocked me although it shouldn’t have.
We are in a downward spiral.
.
Robert and Mier were Bush’s first pick
I don’t know why people still defend Bush. He can’t be trusted. He’s an big government establishment guy
Time for the fourteenth amendment section three
We certainly cannot take another Bush in the White House. Enough harm already from one family.
Take down that statue of Roberts at the Supreme Court, and dig him up and move him.
Oops. He’s not dead? That’s not a statue?
I’ll check in tomorrow am to see what’s left (sorry for misusing ‘left’).
A first-year law student also knows that a law found under the TAX CODE is interpreted under TAX LAW.
This ruling was not about whether Obamacare should be under the tax code. This ruling was based on the fact that Obamacare IS under the tax code. And therefore it had to be interpreted as a tax law is interpreted - a FEDERAL tax law.
So surprise, surprise, the ruling turned out to be that the meaning of "State" in this federal tax law includes the "State" of the "District of Columbia" - just as is stated in Scalia's referenced definition at 42 USC §18024(d).
ping
Bush and his father were failures as president. I think Jeb would be worse than either of them.
Let us not forget that there were five other Coconspirators involved.
Just because we already knew their Political bent does not negate the Fact that they purposely violated their Oath and Judicial Impartiality in this decision.
Traitors, there is no other description of them.
“So this is what a ‘soft’ coup looks like...”
Exactly. We are going the way of Venezuela. These are Chavez tactics. It is hard not to credit that Roberts and Kennedy were pressured with some serious pressure.
In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath grow heavy and are filling, growing heavy for the vintage.
Fk it....
My wife made the point and I agree: someone in the administration has “something” on Roberts. We were only waiting on how he might torture logic to support this garbage.
I’m there. The Court must now interpret intent and rewrite law all because we have an Affirmative Action President.
The Court is also saying that being “born” puts you in hock to the US government.
I can’t fight the law on this matter with paper. So be it.
2 unelected c-suckers decide to use the Constitution as toilet paper and anyone who cares just wrings their hands....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.